Just download the RC4 Banaries:
the darkcoind is ok and the MN has been updated.
but the darkcoin-qt seems the version is still 10.12.12?
v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
- Status
Just download the RC4 Banaries:
the darkcoind is ok and the MN has been updated.
but the darkcoin-qt seems the version is still 10.12.12?
flare
Well-known member
Version 0.10.7.2 is rather ancient ^^is it just me? or this happens to everybody the first time.
moli
Well-known member
Hi,
Is there an updated windows wallet with Darksend for testnet? I've noticed flare's newest windows wallets do not have the Darksend feature, which is needed for this testing. I am sure there are many windows users are waiting to know if they can send more than 9.99 drk through Darksend.
Thank you.
Is there an updated windows wallet with Darksend for testnet? I've noticed flare's newest windows wallets do not have the Darksend feature, which is needed for this testing. I am sure there are many windows users are waiting to know if they can send more than 9.99 drk through Darksend.
Thank you.
JGCMiner
Active member
Yes with RC4 you will be able to Darksend any amount. However, currently Darksend enabled wallets are linux only on testnet. So you can try to get linux set up or wait for RC4 on mainnet. It is not expected to be a long wait.
clayop
Member
I cannot send anonymous funds, nevertheless I have enough anonymized balance. Is this only for me?
http://imgur.com/Cufj1NX
ADDITION: When I use darksend command on console, it works. However, GUI still does not work.
ADDITION: When I use darksend command on console, it works. However, GUI still does not work.
Last edited by a moderator:
flare
Well-known member
Here are the CI-builds for v0.9.12.13
Windows 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DWD-DRK/QTL/build-85/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/darkcoin-qt.exe
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...tian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/daemon/darkcoind.exe
Mac OS X:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DOD-DRK-68/artifact/QTL/gitian-osx-darkcoin/DarkCoin-Qt.dmg
Linux 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-61/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-61/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoind
Linux 64bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-61/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-61/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoind
flare
Well-known member
Will update my fours nodes now - and yes: All mainnet nodes will be kicked and need to update to RC4 when rolled out.
flare
Well-known member
On a sidenote: Had a play with bitcore API on Darkcoin, this is the result 
If you ever wondered how Darkcoin transactions sound and look like --> http://flow.darkcoin.qa
Credits go to raze for the background artworks!
If you ever wondered how Darkcoin transactions sound and look like --> http://flow.darkcoin.qa
Credits go to raze for the background artworks!
flare
Well-known member
While you are at it: Please also replace "DarkCoin" with "Darkcoin" labels
M
MangledBlue
Guest
If the MN's are going to be kicked when RC4 rolls, should we not allow 1-3 days for people to update the nodes and then release to the public?
1 it will build up a sort of climax - lol - and 2 it will allow for a smoother transition? (or I would think)
Maybe I'm wrong......?
flare
Well-known member
In the past mainnet rollouts leveled out after ~24hrs in masternode network. The masternode protocol ('dsee' and 'dseep') is pretty stable right now.
So yes, we could have a 'two wave rollout' to mainnet, but i don't see the benefit - yet
I think we will see a rollout without annoncement as we all were surprised as the last time.In the past mainnet rollouts leveled out after ~24hrs in masternode network. The masternode protocol ('dsee' and 'dseep') is pretty stable right now.
So yes, we could have a 'two wave rollout' to mainnet, but i don't see the benefit - yet
So maybe we see a announcement - Please Update to new version.
All other will bring much speculation to the market.
Ok, but do you think that word BITCOIN is rigth when we are testing DARKCOIN wallet?
JGCMiner
Active member
In the past mainnet rollouts leveled out after ~24hrs in masternode network. The masternode protocol ('dsee' and 'dseep') is pretty stable right now.
So yes, we could have a 'two wave rollout' to mainnet, but i don't see the benefit - yet
If masternodes are going to get kicked then I think a date for RC4's release should be announced in advance and the binaries available at least a couple days before said date. Otherwise people are going to claim their nodes got ninja banned and accuse insiders of scooping up tons of payments while the MN count is low. Basically it would be like a instamine for MN payments.
Obviously this is not the dev teams intention, but in this space the appearance of impropriety often is just as bad as a proven scam.
So I ask:
Is there any reason not to announce a date then give people a few days to update? Plus if RC4 is released MN payment enforcement "on" then isn't it a hardfork anyway? (Feel free to ignore the last part if the intention is to release RC4 enforcement off.)
vertoe
Three of Nine
In my opinon, do not give these speculators that only wait on a announcement a chance for short term profits on a pump & pump.
If it is technical possible to announce a update without a warning with all wallets available - do it.
All really in DRK interested people will update within 24hours and all will be fine.
We know darksend is working, so let us find the real price of DRK and release RC4 like a bomb - without a speculating pump like - is it working or not, let us pump and dump ???
BelStar
Member
Can we get back on topic? This is the RC4 testing thread, not the speculation thread.
This said, I do not feel comfortable with only testing Linux builds of the masternode/darksend client on testnet. I believe we should finalize testing with windows and mac clients as well before releasing to mainnet.
flare : Are there any plans to provide windows/mac builds for use on testnet? I assume they will all be available at the same time for mainnet use anyways?
This said, I do not feel comfortable with only testing Linux builds of the masternode/darksend client on testnet. I believe we should finalize testing with windows and mac clients as well before releasing to mainnet.
flare : Are there any plans to provide windows/mac builds for use on testnet? I assume they will all be available at the same time for mainnet use anyways?
- Status