Hard to really say anymore... with the masternode donations, one could "donate" all their earnings to any address they want, including their own.Please check out this address : Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt , all blocks from 249165 till now (249185) are paying out as master node... I guess something is wrong... Also the address is not having 1000 DASH...
In console type: masternode list donation Xo4R, and you'll see:Please check out this address : Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt , all blocks from 249165 till now (249185) are paying out as master node... I guess something is wrong... Also the address is not having 1000 DASH...
In console type: masternode list donation Xo4R, and you'll see:
{
"5.9.240.130:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.131:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.132:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.133:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.134:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.135:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.128:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100",
"5.9.240.129:9999" : "Xo4RRE5rU7HK4t3Lum8fzF63P4QTrV5nVt:100"
}
Look up the first IP 5.9.240.130 and you'll see the MNs that author these payments:
View attachment 1320
My sneaky method: I've followed Udjin's posts... I even made a bookmark for some of his posts because of all the devs he likes to explain things the most. I bookmarked some of flare's posts also. How I could find this donation stuff is from Udjin's post here:Thanks for this moli.
Btw, does anyone else think that it is about time (maybe after MN blinding hits mainnet) that Evan and the other devs step back from coding for a few weeks and carefully document the current state of the features of the coin? Right now, if you don't follow the development religiously (or enjoy reading line after line of code) you have next to no idea how things currently work. Take the white paper on Darksend or the KA security audit for example. Things have drastically improved since then, but since this hasn't been documented those who are not hardcore supporters don't realize that fact. The confusion over the donations is just another example of the effect of a lack of documentation.
In short, I think it is time to take documentation more seriously so that the general level of confusion related to the current feature set is reduced.
Thoughts?
yes, indeed. The current release is really a pain for continuous integration systems :smile:Bad name directory dash-v0.11.2.22-linux in tar.gz. Without 'v' in prewiev version.
yes, indeed. The current release is really a pain for continuous integration systems :smile:
A bad name for the directory dash-v0.11.2.22-linux in tar.gz. In previous versions it was without the char 'v'.
It's a problem for the automatic update.
Is this a new naming convention or is it a fluke (i.e. lack of convention)?
eduffield , the checksum file for the linux download https://www.dashpay.io/binaries/dash-0.11.2.22-linux.tar.gz.DIGESTS.txt is coming up empty. Please fix.*********** Please Update To 11.2.22! ****************
- DS Speed Improvements : Darksend should be lightning fast now on mainnet. We're going to delay the implementation of masternode blinding because there's two separate mobile wallets that are in the process of implementing Darksend and the reference implementation needs to be super stable during this period of time. Once we have the mobile wallets done (which should have Darksend and InstantX support) we can move back to improving Darksend.
- DS Max Rounds is now 8, which is more than enough for anyone. If someone wants more security, they can use the parameter which goes up to 16.
- Fixed Chinese Translations
- Masternode voting should now work properly. Masternode operators can copy their masternode.conf to another computer and vote without having their wallets online now.
https://www.dashpay.io/downloads/
yes with protocol bump the colt/hot wallets of new ver have to be started both.Is this a protocol update? Require a cold start? My MNs fell off the list...I only updated remote side though. Would be nice if it was a standard to state whether or not the updates require a cold start instead of having to guess...
Yes, protocol update so need to start from local.Is this a protocol update? Require a cold start? My MNs fell off the list...I only updated remote side though. Would be nice if it was a standard to state whether or not the updates require a cold start instead of having to guess...
Found something as well
no address visible....
edit: strange as I`ve opened the wallet again and it is OK now....