v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
- Status
Both getting confirmed, but they stuck on 5/6 for some time.
I saw this in the debug.log..
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:rocessConsensusVote - Masternode not in the top 10
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:07 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX::CConsensusVote::SignatureValid() - Verify message failed
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:08 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:48:11 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:03 DoAutomaticDenominating : No funds detected in need of denominating
2015-02-02 10:49:19 InstantX:
2015-02-02 10:49:19 InstantX:
Статус: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx)
Дата: 2.2.2015 г. 12:43От: неизвестен
За: y9dezSgHxG94GQbxiAGxDTzx4k1Y55bahc (собствен адрес)
Кредит: 14.00 tDRK
Нетна сума: +14.00 tDRKID: 091ac0744f706795e701878bd9761118f4ded75e6235ba1a57a49479119e3759-000
Sub-Ether
Well-known member
Mixed 800 tdrk in 1.5 hours and sent some to lonecrouton that appeared to work fine, but who cares did not broadcast,
''Status: 5/offline (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 02/02/2015 10:53''
I restarted the wallet, and it broadcast the transaction, but the previous transaction of 9.2 to lonecrouton that was instantX confirmed has now dissappeared and gone back to a normal sent type transaction and is still confirming, is this to be expected as the instantX transaction places itself in the regular blockchain via the masternodes.
''Status: 5/offline (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 02/02/2015 10:53''
I restarted the wallet, and it broadcast the transaction, but the previous transaction of 9.2 to lonecrouton that was instantX confirmed has now dissappeared and gone back to a normal sent type transaction and is still confirming, is this to be expected as the instantX transaction places itself in the regular blockchain via the masternodes.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sent some DS 2R+IX to Sub-Ether
Status: 5/offline (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 2.2.2015 г. 13:11
To: sub-ether yKHYvSD2owwgEhgucYGcDAvWwCdd2yZS5k
Debit: -100.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.001 tDRK
Net amount: -100.001 tDRK
Transaction ID: f2e3e73fe444b4402487c46c12ecea66514c01dc1eb4922e98c80ca7edd73f90-000
Status: 5/offline (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 2.2.2015 г. 13:11
To: sub-ether yKHYvSD2owwgEhgucYGcDAvWwCdd2yZS5k
Debit: -100.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.001 tDRK
Net amount: -100.001 tDRK
Transaction ID: f2e3e73fe444b4402487c46c12ecea66514c01dc1eb4922e98c80ca7edd73f90-000
Sub-Ether
Well-known member
Possibility nodes are not broadcasting properly due to small testnet environment? But I Got it anyway :grin:
Status: 8 confirmations (verified via instantx)Date: 02/02/2015 11:11From: unknownTo: yKHYvSD2owwgEhgucYGcDAvWwCdd2yZS5k (own address, label: instant X test address)Credit: 100.00 tDRKNet amount: +100.00 tDRKTransaction ID: f2e3e73fe444b4402487c46c12ecea66514c01dc1eb4922e98c80ca7edd73f90-000
Confirmed on my side also :smile:.
Maybe I'm stucking from time to time because of high bandwidth load caused by both ds/ix.
I'm not sure.
EDIT:
Very high bandwidth load occurred during the denom process (1000/16).
Last edited by a moderator:
eduffield
Core Developer
Yep, that's fine. The InstantX data is not persistent (yet anyway).
eduffield
Core Developer
Neither of those should cause extremely high bandwidth. Can you send me the debug.log? [email protected]
Another weekend working where I miss all the fun !! aarg!!
Finishing setting up a tMN and almost ready to rock.
Dont really want to go through the first 8 pages if I dont have to ... anything I need to know?
Here is my addy, no need to send tMN funding, just IX
y9fejP7BWPjjoQoSvVmoSiK5G4jw2WxYyx
.
Finishing setting up a tMN and almost ready to rock.
Dont really want to go through the first 8 pages if I dont have to ... anything I need to know?
Here is my addy, no need to send tMN funding, just IX
y9fejP7BWPjjoQoSvVmoSiK5G4jw2WxYyx
.
Done.
It's happening when I receive denom tx and starts confirming it/broadcasting/.
Windows x64.
I'm having a problem with my tMN... can't start it for some reason. Its a hot tMN, so I'm using externalip:xx.xx.xx.xx
get this, with or without :19999
With masternodeaddr, I get this
Tried without :19999 in the config, but give same error but says
ports are open
ideas?
get this, with or without :19999
With masternodeaddr, I get this
Tried without :19999 in the config, but give same error but says
ports are open
ideas?
Seeing a similar problem, mine are remote but getting same "can't start check the port" message. They were working last night dropped off the list today and now can't start them. Gonna try to bring up a fresh one after blockchain sync
Lukas_Jackson
Active member
Hi yidakee. You don't need any extarnal IP in config for hot one.
I have this in my config:
Code:
testnet=1
listen=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=wwwwwwww
rpcpassword=qqqqqqqq
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
logtimestamps=1
masternode=1
maxconnections=256
masternodeprivkey=1111111111111
I'd like join the party and set up a 11.1.x test MN. I have the remote daemon setup. Now I'd like to find a mac wallet, but the link on page 1 directs to a Page not found. Is there an updated link buried somewhere?
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DR...n-osx-darkcoin-dist/darkcoin-0.11.1.0-osx.dmg
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DR...n-osx-darkcoin-dist/darkcoin-0.11.1.0-osx.dmg
Really? Is that "new" ... 'cos we did before the cold/hot setup was created ... I think... it was so long ago I cant remember
EDIT: without it I get this
EDIT2: Found the issue. I had listen=0 in the config, changed to =1 with masternodeaadr=xx.xx.xx.xx:19999. All is good.
Going to try and "break" testnet. Quick question, the enabledarksend=0 flag is redundant if masternode=1 right?
EDiT: Found a "bug" in the InstantX implementation. Maybe there is a cap I'm un-aware of? In any case, all I have to say is this. LOL
I set instantxdepth=256, but it seems that the max is 60. In the following quote, 60 + 2 mined blocks.
Also, I tested and this is valid both for sending and receiving funds.
EDiT: Found a "bug" in the InstantX implementation. Maybe there is a cap I'm un-aware of? In any case, all I have to say is this. LOL
I set instantxdepth=256, but it seems that the max is 60. In the following quote, 60 + 2 mined blocks.
Also, I tested and this is valid both for sending and receiving funds.
Last edited by a moderator:
Better read of this thread answered my question. In case anyone else is looking, here is the mac link.
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DR...n-osx-darkcoin-dist/darkcoin-0.11.1.1-osx.dmg
- Status