v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
GNULinuxGuy said:
Same error here testing v0.10.12.8-2-g8e282f2-beta. Mine is attempting to denominate 563400000 coins, but my testing address (mfuNdNYZeHytU3mBbu3eUaA1FrYNan1ubK) only has 999.63400000 remaining.
Click to expand...
The log message removes the decimal separation. :p
 
OK denomination is working. What next, should we play darksend-pingpong again?

Someone do a DS+ transaction to this address msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB and share another address to reply with a DS+ tx.
 
flare said:
Yes, it's darkoshi :p
Click to expand...
On closer inspection this version of DoAutomaticDenominating() has attempted to denominate 563400000 and 50563400000 coins. All my other errors with previous versions were much smaller numbers, so it was a bit surprising/confusing. :smile:
 
vertoe said:
OK denomination is working. What next, should we play darksend-pingpong again?

Someone do a DS+ transaction to this address msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB and share another address to reply with a DS+ tx.
Click to expand...
I envy you - my denominations still down work. Want to start flooding the blockchain with darksend-tx :)
 
My denominations finished, so I want to summarize.
I have public input address: http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/mvFokwqXwNsA3SqdrqqwR93MfhFuPxFiv2.
There were 3 transactions for 1000 DRK every.
After denominations I have 3 new addresses.
Two of them have non-zero balances, 0.3 DRK and 0.4 DRK. In logs I see "Too little to denominate (must have 1.1DRK)". These addresses inherit from public address and there is a direct relationship between public address and these two.
The last transaction http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/tx/39d69edfef80ab5ea95bf488914675c5df7e5a84a5449f578f6d20bc349e5541 is very interesting, because blockchain shows us only 2 addresses and one of them is my third address http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/n3JEHNGv2tjE4RokGxwASHgfW6Gr3zCEtT which has 2999.256 DRK (3000 DRK input). Another address http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/mfuNdNYZeHytU3mBbu3eUaA1FrYNan1ubK I can't view, because there is an error: I'm sorry, this address has too many records to display.

So, as for me, in exactly my situation it's very easy to track money. How do you think? Maybe, I wasn't considered something?

My debug log suspicious records:

2014-07-28 17:42:52 DoAutomaticDenominating : Running darksend denominate for 1000000000 coins. Return 'Insufficient funds 2'
2014-07-28 17:42:52 DoAutomaticDenominating: Split up large input:

2014-07-28 18:52:12 DoAutomaticDenominating : Too little to denominate (must have 1.1DRK)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CODERsp said:
My denominations finished, so I want to summarize.
I have public input address: http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/mvFokwqXwNsA3SqdrqqwR93MfhFuPxFiv2.
There were 3 transactions for 1000 DRK every.
After denominations I have 3 new addresses.
Two of them have non-zero balances, 0.3 DRK and 0.4 DRK. In logs I see "Too little to denominate (must have 1.1DRK)". These addresses inherit from public address and there is a direct relationship between public address and these two.
The last transaction http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/tx/39d69edfef80ab5ea95bf488914675c5df7e5a84a5449f578f6d20bc349e5541 is very interesting, because blockchain shows us only 2 addresses and one of them is my third address http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/n3JEHNGv2tjE4RokGxwASHgfW6Gr3zCEtT which has 2999.256 DRK (3000 DRK input). Another address http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/address/mfuNdNYZeHytU3mBbu3eUaA1FrYNan1ubK I can't view, because there is an error: I'm sorry, this address has too many records to display.

So, as for me, in exactly my situation it's very easy to track money. How do you think? Maybe, I wasn't considered something?
Click to expand...
Well its only denominated, did you do a Darksend transaction yet? If not, please do so: msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
 
vertoe said:
Well its only denominated, did you do a Darksend transaction yet? If not, please do so: msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
Click to expand...
Done! I didn't see "use DarkSend+" checkbox, such in RC2. Do I need additional actions to use DarkSend or it's by default now? Seems, I did common transaction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
darksend msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB 450
Error: Error parsing JSON:msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
 
vertoe said:
Well its only denominated, did you do a Darksend transaction yet? If not, please do so: msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
Click to expand...
I just sent you 69 tDRK with DS+ inputs; feel free to send some back to n4mJmycicjbcRbETpiSdGXCBzjDEMNzsHU
 
Date: 7/28/14 14:19
To: vertoes D+ msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
Debit: -111.11 DRK
Net amount: -111.11 DRK
Transaction ID: 519971115ecf65bd8645d39ad6a78b7f01c560a114f32748b80a519cb0c7b041

I think I sent D+. There is no D+ tick like before, but below the drop down menu says "Only DS+ Inputs" so I guess thats it !



Debug information

Debit: -100.00 DRK
Debit: -10.00 DRK
Debit: -1.00 DRK
Debit: -1.00 DRK
Credit: 0.89 DRK

Transaction:
CTransaction(hash=519971115ecf65bd8645d39ad6a78b7f01c560a114f32748b80a519cb0c7b041, ver=1, vin.size=4, vout.size=2, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(6fffd6afe44fdd37b03a69adec70ef757d7cde5eba18ce64628d7cfbaea6280a, 1), scriptSig=304402206d67b7143ceaf98a)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 11), scriptSig=3045022100f2ddcec72c8c3d)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 16), scriptSig=3045022100d8669e85c4a3aa)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 19), scriptSig=3044022049051c2836e692d3)
CTxOut(nValue=111.11000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 82946b9b861a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.89000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 977591709bbc)

Inputs:
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=100.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=10.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=1.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=1.00 DRK IsMine=true


Here is my address : mw7rxNhr5y8SThquDtSt8H2WKuKopWdZEk
 
CODERsp said:
darksend msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB 450
Error: Error parsing JSON:msRPwRCoF2DkVMdUTtR9sNyUPEZLWA99iB
Click to expand...
Same for me, seems Evan changed the parameter format to JSON, but i was not able to figure out the correct format.

Code: 
./darkcoind darksend '{"mmQuoVyRHF595ZZPk4gDzWYNY9cGhZJ9bZ":1}'
error: value is type obj, expected real
 
BelStar said:
I just sent you 69 tDRK with DS+ inputs; feel free to send some back to n4mJmycicjbcRbETpiSdGXCBzjDEMNzsHU
Click to expand...

Date: 7/28/14 14:26
To: Belstar D+ n4mJmycicjbcRbETpiSdGXCBzjDEMNzsHU
Debit: -321.123 DRK
Net amount: -321.123 DRK
Transaction ID: 0af18f4b72ec49a4dd9d3f161072475dab11ac32f59fa96831047c2351ab243f



Debug information

Debit: -100.00 DRK
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Debit: -1.00 DRK
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Debit: -10.00 DRK
Debit: -10.00 DRK
Debit: -1.00 DRK
Credit: 0.877 DRK

Transaction:
CTransaction(hash=0af18f4b72ec49a4dd9d3f161072475dab11ac32f59fa96831047c2351ab243f, ver=1, vin.size=7, vout.size=2, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(6fffd6afe44fdd37b03a69adec70ef757d7cde5eba18ce64628d7cfbaea6280a, 2), scriptSig=30450221008d4f5c29690089)
CTxIn(COutPoint(6fffd6afe44fdd37b03a69adec70ef757d7cde5eba18ce64628d7cfbaea6280a, 3), scriptSig=3046022100ce56d68f51b80d)
CTxIn(COutPoint(6fffd6afe44fdd37b03a69adec70ef757d7cde5eba18ce64628d7cfbaea6280a, 14), scriptSig=304502202998ada4c70205fc)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 3), scriptSig=3046022100a17fe0aed3c731)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 7), scriptSig=30460221008d38517ccf36c8)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 9), scriptSig=304402205c0c18f8484d5952)
CTxIn(COutPoint(4ac60f935a997408de3fc599510ee6f3f4b1adb981adc5fbe8eb987162997a45, 18), scriptSig=3045022100de6a70a8763c6b)
CTxOut(nValue=321.12300000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 ff01d0436862)
CTxOut(nValue=0.87700000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 57663220f47a)

Inputs:
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=100.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=100.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=1.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=100.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=10.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=10.00 DRK IsMine=true
muKoAoB5Ad88SBrSgKpzkSRsxYdJT8vss5 Amount=1.00 DRK IsMine=true
 
flare said:
Same for me, seems Evan changed the parameter format to JSON, but i was not able to figure out the correct format.

Code: 
./darkcoind darksend '{"mmQuoVyRHF595ZZPk4gDzWYNY9cGhZJ9bZ":1}'
error: value is type obj, expected real
Click to expand...
Had a chat with Evan, and
Code: 
"darksend <darkcoinaddress> <amount>
is not used to send DRK anymore. darksend command is only used to denominate, after that you just use "sendtoaddress".

Evan will deprecate the "darksend" command in the next interation and introduce

"denominate" and "sendtoaddressanon" commands instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top