ScioMind
Active member
Speak for yourself. I am none of the above. And whereas I might trust a "slave" to at least be honest, I could not say the same of a narcissist, psychopath or sadist.
Stupids and Spies bought masternodes in order to stop governance.
- Thread starter demo
- Start date
- Status
noobtrader
Active member
i dont really understand how would proof individuality be implemented, pls demo make an example about yourself, tell us all who you are and where you live etc, enlighten us all in this thread.
thanks
thanks
demo
Well-known member
No, you are much more in danger when slaves surround you.
Because they obey to the sadist.
A sadist is harmless, in case no slaves obey him.
There is no honest slave.
Honest people prefer to die than being enslaved.
Last edited:
demo
Well-known member
You dont expect me to reveal my identity or break my anonymity, do you?
The proof of individuality I propose is simple.
We have to gather all together in a closed enviroment (room, hall, stadium), and then every individual puts an (empty) cryptowallet address (a public-key paper-printed into QR code) into a physical ballot box.
After they all put their public-key into the ballot box, the ballot box is unsealed, and a committee counts the public keys found into the ballot box and finds them to be equal to the number of attendees. A list of all the attendees' public keys (that were found into the ballot box) is created, then everyone confirms that his key is inside the list. And if there is no objection by anyone, then the (final) valid list of public-keys(cryptowallet_adresses) is given/broadcasted to all the attendees. Then the doors of the room/hall/stadium open, and the procedure ends. From now on, whenever you see a public key from the list into the internet, you can be sure that this originates from an individual.
More than one meetings can occur in separated closed spaces, as long as they occur concurrently (or almost concurrently in case the one is located in Japan and the other in US), and a web of trust among these meetings can be established.
For more information, questions, bugs/issues of the procedure, read here:
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/...ndividuality-to-be-implemented-in-dash.15946/
Last edited:
ScioMind
Active member
demo
Well-known member
Of course I am dishonest. Everybody is. God is the only truly honest one. Everyone else is partially honest and partially dishonest, but the percentages do matter when you want to characterize someone.
In any case, the farther you are from freedom, the more dishonest you are. If you serve freedom, then you can be named as slave of freedom, but in that case you are much more free than those who do not serve freedom.
"No one can serve two masters.
Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.
You cannot serve both God and money."
Last edited:
Please, don't feed the troll. Thanks.
demo
Well-known member
Pietro Speroni
Active member
who is your master?
demo
Well-known member
My master is the same as your master. Dont you know who your master is?
Pietro Speroni
Active member
I have no master. I come here with my name, my cv, my research published. And I represent only myself.
But who are you?
Who is behind you?
Are you actually paid to come to this forum?
You speak about spies,and your behaviour is all but transparent.
demo
Well-known member
Of course you have a master. The one who decides that you should have one head, two hands, two legs, one mouth and two pair of ears used to listen only one voice at a time, this is your master.
I am demo. Nobody is behind me. I represent only myself, too. No I am not paid to come to this forum. My behavior is transparent. I am talking in public, I am not talking in secret/private channels like most of the other forum members are doing. You can read almost everything I said, my messages are all visible (except the ones deleted by the admins, but this is not my fault). And, against the will of the local majority, I am always asking this:
<vote history>
Would you like a proof of individuality for the Dash community?
*yes 6 vote(s) 19.4%
no 20 vote(s) 64.5%
other 2 vote(s) 6.5%
Proof of potato(e). 3 vote(s) 9.7%
</vote history>
I have also created mnowatch , in order to preserve the vote history which is deleted in the dash network. Some masternodes owners want the vote history, and the crimes they did with their vote, to be forgotten.
So if you want to blame someone for lack of transparency, better search among those who voted against the proof of individuality, or among those who abstain from this poll, or among those who do not keep or delete the vote history.
Last edited:
demo
Well-known member
Hey @camosoul! Here is the proof of potato(e) you were asking for....
<vote history>
Would you like a proof of individuality for the Dash community?
*yes 6 vote(s) 18.8%
no 20 vote(s) 62.5%
other 2 vote(s) 6.3%
Proof of potato(e). 4 vote(s) 12.5%
</vote history>
Last edited:
- Status