Can we go back to this one now? (ducks)
@ JOL Isn't that just a on/off button?
The video that Triptolemoose posted helped me in my acceptance process of the T&C logo.
But.... both have been rejected, so what happens now?
Back to the drawing board? Or just continue using what we have?
Degratulations for getting paid when the no votes for both proposals were ignored.
No votes were not ignored. They helped make up the 20% minimum participation requirement.
The O&M logo says "Hi, we're a company, and we've got a little icon next to our name to prove it." The T&P logo says "There's a new way to pay, and it's called Dash."
Dash is not a company. What's more, the T&P logo has a potential Unicode "D" symbol baked right in, which both preserves the spirit of the current logo and gives a handy currency symbol.
So I vote for T&P's design.
We risk having an unnecessary hate it or love it logo change and divide/split in community or we could keep on trucking with what we already have and keep everyone happy. Everyone was happy up until now. Nothing has changed in my eyes. I believe MNO's were most interested and eager for a major advertising & marketing strategy campaign push in preparation for Evolution over rebranding.
Vote #Remain
You guys are making a complete mess of this. This proposal is not about currency symbols or "iconic D"s. Go ahead and show me where it says that?
Mercedes Benz, a three point star, originally represented their ambition to rule over "air, land and sea". How many of you knew that? - none? - why not? So who do you think is going to look at that finger in a hole and think "dash"?? The general public doesn't care for your "heritage" and the people putting genomic registration on the dash blockchain aren't thinking about "cash". How small your minds to think that the height of dash's success is to be cash, or stuck with a bland icon that has outstayed it's welcome. All that pent-up nostalgia has gone to your head.
Additionally, if either of these icons are implemented without passing super majority, then kiss goodbye to your "DAO"; the start of a very slippery slope. It would, I suppose, be a governance fork, choosing to abuse the tool you live and die by.
Say it whatever way you want, I'm not using the new logo.
Yeah, you can fuck off as well.
1) - The fact that a logo is also adopting passing Dash code rules, can be a point that needs to be taken seriously.
2) - We have no studies validating T&C's statements. And what says T&C and those who introduced this company can only be taken as a biased opinion.
The old logo is not voted, so IMHO T&C is legitimated to substitute it.Yeah, you can fuck off as well.
Say it whatever way you want, I'm not using the new logo.
@TanteStefana Oh... we can do everything we want
But I think as soon as we are going back to that one, mainstream adoption is going bye bye
To be clear. If the network vote to fund payment to Tharp & Clark in order to use the new branding (I.E. Our chosen branding gets supermajority in the follow-up proposal next month), will you agree to the result of that vote, and switch to using the new T&C logo moving forward - therefore respecting the decision of the Dash DAO (MNOs and Core) regardless of your strongly held personal opinions?
Yes, totally, I have always done this. It's not possible for the outcome to always be in our favor, we all make the same compromises. I have always respected the outcome.
The old logo is not voted, so IMHO T&C is legitimated to substitute it.
Instead of complaining, you' ve better demand for this case to become the rule.
A voted decision that has more "yes" than "no", substitutes whatever status quo is not voted.
Will you fund this governance question?
Demo says that because the old logo was not voted in, in his opinion, the new T&C logo also doesn't need to be voted in. I'd considering agreeing with this to some degree if it wasn't a budget decision, however, because we will be paying for the rights to use the T&C logo, it really needs to hit the 10% supermajority to receive funding, as that's how the funding works in Dash.
However, if the T&C funding proposal doesn't receive supermajority and community members choose to donate funds to buy the rights (or core choose to draw from their existing budget to cover it, as is their prerogative), then Demo might have a point, and the YES voting community (or core) might not need a supermajority win to roll out the new T&C logo and replace the current logo within their marketing. What are your thoughts on this?
The payment was agreed in Euros direct with core, so not sure how that affects things.