Dummy question #461
My transactions are all gone ?
no idea what happened.
When i click (top left) 'today', shouldn't that switch to all ?
It does not ? Bug ? (Mac)
I just tried this on my Mac, no problem at all, the normal select options show up there and I'm able to select "All".
Does "Reset Options" help?
Hello crowning !
For Repair Wallet Options, is it possible to have another button with both -zapwallettxes and -reindex? (So we don't have to do this in command-line or shortcut.)
And btw, what's the difference between "-zapwallettxes=1" and "-zapwallettxes=2" ? I've tried both buttons but I don't see any difference.
Thank you!
Well, I've used both in one restart but I don't know if other people do the same. If it's too much trouble, don't worry, I can always put them together in the shortcut and run the wallet. Thanks, crowning.It's possible of course, but do you think this combination is used by enough people (and often enough) to justify another button? After all you can first do one and after the restart do the other one.
-zapwallettxes 1 tries to read the meta-data from the transaction (value, from, timestamp, account name, etc.), -zapwallettxes 2 not.
But it can only read what's already there, and right now that seems to be not very much. Maybe that'll change in the future...
You mean they contradict each other?moli I think -zapwallettxes and -reindex are kind of... perpendicular so to say.
-zapwallettxes - clean any txes known by your wallet and rediscover them by rescanning blockchain (either filling back old data from a copy or not)
i.e. blockchain was ok, it's smth wrong with txes in your wallet
-reindex - recreate blockchain index
i.e. wallet is kind of ok but blockchain is broken
No, they don't contradict, it's completely fine to use them together and this should fix both issues but I mean it's quite a rare situation, no? I think in most cases it's a wallet issue (conflicted txes etc) and that requires zapping, in rare cases it's a fork or a major upgrade and that requires reindex. Both issues together... hmmm I don't really know...You mean they contradict each other?
I thought if we have a wallet that has conflicted tx's and a broken chain file... Then the command '-reindex -zapwallettxes' would fix both problems in one shot. No?
Yeh, and cars should be intelligent and automatic enough to drive user where he wants without user being involved in pushing some mystical pedals. That already started to happen but it took some time :wink:Wallet should be intelligent and automatic enough so user does not need get involved and press
some mystical buttons if there is some problems :wink:
Yep, i do not mind push the buttons, i love it, but newbie user do not.Yeh, and cars should be intelligent and automatic enough to drive user where he wants without user being involved in pushing some mystical pedals. That already started to happen but it took some time :wink:
I've done this many times... Did a lot during testing... Just did it again with a few leftover testnet wallets last weekend so i was just wondering if there was a button for it... lol..No, they don't contradict, it's completely fine to use them together and this should fix both issues but I mean it's quite a rare situation, no? I think in most cases it's a wallet issue (conflicted txes etc) and that requires zapping, in rare cases it's a fork or a major upgrade and that requires reindex. Both issues together... hmmm I don't really know...
To add more: reindex is a computationally/IO heavy operation while zapwallettxes (and rescan that happens automatically during zapping) uses way less resources i.e. take way less time to complete. So if I would have some problem and I had no idea what was broken (wallet or blockchain) I would start with rescan/zapping first and would use reindex only in cases when rescan didn't work.
But if we imagine someone who is "I don't care about time, just do whatever is possible to make it work" then this "combined" option could be ok too I guess :wink:
NYC taxi drivers will be replaced by these: http://inhabitat.com/nyc-will-replace-taxis-with-new-driverless-google-cabs/Yeh, and cars should be intelligent and automatic enough to drive user where he wants without user being involved in pushing some mystical pedals. That already started to happen but it took some time :wink:
Japan already has driverless taxis
Hahaha....That's nothing, over here in Germany we have phoneless wires!