[dashninja.pl] Dash Masternode Ninja - Free Masternode Monitoring

tx man
that's what I am talking about !!!
well well done and everybody happy ...>>
 
I'm using elberethzone's fantastic API to display at-a-glance masternode balance information at http://drk.monitor.mn/

You can monitor multiple masternodes by adding the full ipaddress(s) into the big Filter By input box.

I'll be adding more features this week, and I'm open to suggestions from the community.

If you find the site useful, please consider tipping elberethzone. I have a link to his DRK address at the bottom of my site.
 
elbereth Not sure if you noticed but https://drk.mn/blocks.html#blocksdetail shows "Unpaid" for blocks that were actually paid.


0hUNqqS.png
 
UdjinM6 said:
elbereth Not sure if you noticed but https://drk.mn/blocks.html#blocksdetail shows "Unpaid" for blocks that were actually paid.


0hUNqqS.png
Click to expand...
Those payees aren't on the MN list. I emailed Evan about this last night.

Edit: Block 175829 paid to this address:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9.htm
and it doesn't have a balance, though it looks like it's the first vin and the 1k DRK was moved. I don't understand it.
And I did show this to elbereth and discuss with him, he asked me to email evan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
UdjinM6, last night (US time zone) this was on drk.mn:

upload_2014-11-26_15-39-38.png


Block 175692 paid to address: XmaySiFee7LKzsVNDmPJSD1YgYgFuuD5ks, but this address wasn't on the MN list.

I sent email to Evan, and he explained that, "I looked at the reference node and I don't have it either. The only reason for this would be that specific node went offline right after the payment happened. So it shouldn't get paid again."

(Sorry I posted this a few min ago and had to repost because the image didn't show up and I couldn't edit it, had to delete that post.)
 
Updated the blocks page:
HTML v2.0.4 / JS v2.0.8 (20141202)
  • Added link to masternode monitoring page in blocks detail on masternode pubkeys.
HTML v2.0.4 / JS v2.0.7 (20141126)
  • Added column in blocks details with expected and actual masternode payment ratio.

Also updated the back-end to fall back to 30% vout detection if the pubkey used for mn payments is not on the masternodelist.

Additionnally I think the IRC bot is now fixed regarding the mn payment ratio (it was sometimes announcing 25% and sometimes 30%).
 
moli said:
Those payees aren't on the MN list. I emailed Evan about this last night.

Edit: Block 175829 paid to this address:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9.htm
and it doesn't have a balance, though it looks like it's the first vin and the 1k DRK was moved. I don't understand it.
And I did show this to elbereth and discuss with him, he asked me to email evan.
Click to expand...
elbereth, remember we discussed this address (Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9) that does not have a balance, yet got MN payment. I just checked my email, Evan replied a few days ago, said:
[http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b#o0

This is an undocumented feature, explained here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9651948#msg9651948/QUOTE]
Click to expand...
 
moli said:
elbereth, remember we discussed this address (Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9) that does not have a balance, yet got MN payment. I just checked my email, Evan replied a few days ago, said:
Click to expand...

So that means the guy funded 2 masternodes then discarded the first one but is still getting paid for the second one, that's it?
 
elbereth said:
So that means the guy funded 2 masternodes then discarded the first one but is still getting paid for the second one, that's it?
Click to expand...
I guess so. It looks like his second address is XhWdVGfSZoGYcBAv6dCUqJ9wpFkWdbBjBS

I'm looking at: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XhWdVGfSZoGYcBAv6dCUqJ9wpFkWdbBjBS.htm

This MN has been up since Nov. 2 (?) and no MN payment has gone to it. So I guess his MN payment went to the first address which has 0 balance. Confusing to me but that's how it is, I guess.
 
Interesting to know, thanks moli for investigating and thanks evan and flare for the solution.
 
Same problem as before, it was payed but to a masternode that was not on the masternode list.
Added a workaround to consider as correct if there is a 35% vout.
 
elbereth said:
Updated masternode page.

HTML v2.0.3 / JS v2.0.9 (20150106)
  • Added support to detect version number of new 0.11 "Core".
Click to expand...

Recently your site was showing 1740 mn, now it shows 1667 mn, wondering what made it change? (fyi other sites displayed 1660's while yours was displaying 1740. Does it have to do with MN running previous versions that the site doesn't check for?

Also noticing that some people are running v 10.17.25, like .3% of all MN, not a large amount by any measure but I'm wondering if anyone can elaborate on that?
 
elberth fixed something on the page yesterday
now the MN count is correct (and the same as darkchild pages)
 
Updated masternode page.

HTML v2.0.4 / JS v2.0.10 (20150117)
  • Backend: Added support for duplicate IPs with several valid pubkeys (you should see a bump of around 250 MNs in the count).
  • Displays both masternode count accurately and the unique IP count.
  • Should not alert/popup when the backend is unresponsive.
 
Feature request: Additional stats by protocol version (70052, 70053, ...) - currently there is only a chart with "clientversion", which is not accurate being "only latest protocol"

upload_2015-1-20_17-40-31.png
 
Well actually is all compatible protocols. Afaik they are all compatibles since the one in v10.
I would need to keep old nodes running to get masternodes list from them. Not sure it is a good idea as those versions are not new enough to have a complete blockchain and sync running.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top