This will be the talk of town for some time now and will probably become a direct competitor to DASH. http://www.wired.com/2016/01/zcash-an-untraceable-bitcoin-alternative-launches-in-alpha/
Z.Cash has some important names in the industry behind it but I think DASH is much better for several reasons.
Z.Cash is structured as a real company, a fixed % of all the mining profits will go to the company. It has some known names like Berry Silbert and Roger Ver as investors to name a few.
The model they've picked, though, is not as good as the one DASH uses, the decentralized autonomous corporation which is structured bottom up, more inclusive, allowing decision making to happen organically.
Z.Cash is 6 months away from launch based on this article.
The lead developer Ian infamously stated a while back that a backdoor could be integrated into their protocol to assist governments in tracking where coins are sent, which lead to some nasty reactions at the time. He tried to downplay that statement later on.
Criticism
One criticism of zerocoin is the added computation time required by the process, which would need to have been performed primarily by bitcoin miners. If the proofs were posted to the block chain, this would also dramatically increase the size of the block chain. Nevertheless, as stated by the original author, the proofs could be stored outside of the blockchain.[4] To counter criticisms that the anonymity offered by zerocoin would facilitate illegal activity, it has been suggested that a backdoor, or other features, could be added to the zerocoin protocol to allow police to track money laundering, but this was not advocated in the original paper.[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin
Z.Cash has some important names in the industry behind it but I think DASH is much better for several reasons.
Z.Cash is structured as a real company, a fixed % of all the mining profits will go to the company. It has some known names like Berry Silbert and Roger Ver as investors to name a few.
The model they've picked, though, is not as good as the one DASH uses, the decentralized autonomous corporation which is structured bottom up, more inclusive, allowing decision making to happen organically.
Z.Cash is 6 months away from launch based on this article.
The lead developer Ian infamously stated a while back that a backdoor could be integrated into their protocol to assist governments in tracking where coins are sent, which lead to some nasty reactions at the time. He tried to downplay that statement later on.
Criticism
One criticism of zerocoin is the added computation time required by the process, which would need to have been performed primarily by bitcoin miners. If the proofs were posted to the block chain, this would also dramatically increase the size of the block chain. Nevertheless, as stated by the original author, the proofs could be stored outside of the blockchain.[4] To counter criticisms that the anonymity offered by zerocoin would facilitate illegal activity, it has been suggested that a backdoor, or other features, could be added to the zerocoin protocol to allow police to track money laundering, but this was not advocated in the original paper.[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin
Last edited by a moderator: