Well, if moli is mining 500 coins at a time, the payments are obviously messed up as mined blocks on testnet were paying out only 9 coins or so, LOL. The way I see it, this payment by blockchain has a list of must-have abilities:
1. The payouts can't be more than the withheld 10% of previous blocks (there should be a way to check this via an explorer or in our wallets).
2. The non-paid portion of the blocks should be visible somewhere. This must not be obfuscated.
3. The successful proposals need to have at least 51% or more of the masternode vote.
4. Once a proposal is successful, it's payments must be locked so no other proposal can usurp them with a higher % vote count (otherwise projects will arbitrarily lose funding after approval). This would be extremely inefficient and cause projects not to be completed, possibly dropped for good.
5. Only a nay vote after approval, that dips the approval below 51% should be able to stop funding. Or some kind of mechanism to cut funding for non compliance / no progress.
Because of #4, there may need to be a mandatory waiting time for the first projects voted in to be able to rank them properly. Perhaps all projects must wait 30 days before they can start getting paid just so proposals can be ranked via vote count.
So, are all these conditions being met? Or was anything forgotten? I know it may not be working, but how is this supposed to work?
1. The payouts can't be more than the withheld 10% of previous blocks (there should be a way to check this via an explorer or in our wallets).
2. The non-paid portion of the blocks should be visible somewhere. This must not be obfuscated.
3. The successful proposals need to have at least 51% or more of the masternode vote.
4. Once a proposal is successful, it's payments must be locked so no other proposal can usurp them with a higher % vote count (otherwise projects will arbitrarily lose funding after approval). This would be extremely inefficient and cause projects not to be completed, possibly dropped for good.
5. Only a nay vote after approval, that dips the approval below 51% should be able to stop funding. Or some kind of mechanism to cut funding for non compliance / no progress.
Because of #4, there may need to be a mandatory waiting time for the first projects voted in to be able to rank them properly. Perhaps all projects must wait 30 days before they can start getting paid just so proposals can be ranked via vote count.
So, are all these conditions being met? Or was anything forgotten? I know it may not be working, but how is this supposed to work?
Last edited by a moderator: