V12 Testing Thread
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
Does this help to denom not confirm problem?
Are you saying if all miners go to update their wallets, problem solved?
No, I'm saying that miners/pools see some transactions and choosing which one to include. By default they just include everything valid because actually it doesn't matter which txes to include while they are valid. BUT nothing stops them from generating empty blocks all the time for example. In a healthy network however this means that such a pool actually do damage to network (because who needs a network with no transactions enabled?) and miners who care about network health should probably leave such pool. But you can't easily say "hey, all of you (who?), you have to include this tx in the block" without facing many issues.
Not sure why we have so many unconfirmed on testnet though...
I wonder this also, because this problem is not so old and it is appeared only about last 7 days.
Earlier this was not a problem, i am quite sure its about code changes, just my 2 duffs.
Yep, zap and reindex helps, but its not right if you have to do this every time you start wallet.
Sure i was, now its 82713 and denominations are now conflicted. Restarted wallet, no mixing.
M
MangledBlue
Guest
How cool is that - lol
create a txt document
input all your employees DASH addy with payment amt for payroll etc
Copy and paste to start iX-HYPER (or whatever we're calling it)
and BOOM - everybody gets paid in 1 swoop !!
I SO LUV IT !!!
create a txt document
input all your employees DASH addy with payment amt for payroll etc
Copy and paste to start iX-HYPER (or whatever we're calling it)
and BOOM - everybody gets paid in 1 swoop !!
I SO LUV IT !!!
Ok, here is the testing video, which demos 3 problems.
Video resolution: 1255 x 695
Duration: 21 minutes
Index (min:sec):
1: DS settings does not update 0:11
2: DS start mixing delay 0:47
3: First unconfirmed denom 2:37
4: Third unconfirmed denom 5:00
5: More unconfirmed denom 12:54
6: 5 unconfirmed denom 18:28
7: DS stop mixing delay 18:53
8: Wallet restart and conflicted 19:40
http://ajm-inc.net/tDASH_Testing/tDASH-Testing1-11-08-2015-2016.html
Video resolution: 1255 x 695
Duration: 21 minutes
Index (min:sec):
1: DS settings does not update 0:11
2: DS start mixing delay 0:47
3: First unconfirmed denom 2:37
4: Third unconfirmed denom 5:00
5: More unconfirmed denom 12:54
6: 5 unconfirmed denom 18:28
7: DS stop mixing delay 18:53
8: Wallet restart and conflicted 19:40
http://ajm-inc.net/tDASH_Testing/tDASH-Testing1-11-08-2015-2016.html
moli
Well-known member
Awesome video, love it. I also had many unconfirmed, conflicted transactions on my two wallets but this was due to the fork we were having, some of the transactions went off on a different chain. Even the two explorers weren't at the same block height earlier if you noticed. The devs are trying to figure out what's causing the forks.