moli
Well-known member
The info is all over on this thread, anybody can see it.Well, it sounded a bit like you meant that the lack of documentation offers some sort of protection against spammers, but maybe I'm just over-interpreting
The info is all over on this thread, anybody can see it.Well, it sounded a bit like you meant that the lack of documentation offers some sort of protection against spammers, but maybe I'm just over-interpreting
Oh, sorry. Maybe it's >15. I don't quite rememberYes.. that's why I thought it odd I had to wait for 16
Oh, sorry. Maybe it's >15. I don't quite remember
The info is all over on this thread, anybody can see it.
You know I've been working as a volunteer, pay me and i'll summarize for you.Yeah, but that's 116 pages long by now. And the info will have to be distilled into some easily-comprehensible format eventually. The rollout is pretty close, so now would be as good a time as any to summarize the current state of things
Here are the commands that you can put on a console to submit a proposal, but it takes a MN wallet to vote for it:I'm not a spammer, so if you could at least PM me the instructions, I would appreciate it...
I'm not a spammer, so if you could at least PM me the instructions, I would appreciate it...
I think you're right, we will have to have an easy to follow tutorial. But I think we're going to only have development funded and marketing funded at first. The interface with the rest of the population, though being worked on, is not ready yet, so really - only the things that are obviously going to need approval ASAP should go on the proposal list at this time. Soon, we will have a public interface that should run smoothly to weed out the good projects from the bad. So yah, we'll probably be spending a lot of time as MN owners, voting down spam to get rid of it, and anyone with a good idea may need someone's help setting up the proposal, but that'd take all of 2 minutes. So maybe I'll start a tutorial (it will be very brief) on how to do a proposal, but it will become much more complex when eventually, you need to manage your proposal and garner votesWell, it sounded a bit like you meant that the lack of documentation offers some sort of protection against spammers, but maybe I'm just over-interpreting
This is my entire point. To me there is less then probably 5-10 ppl that actually know whats going on...Everyone else is staring at pages and pages of info that is almost impossible to sort through. "Just go back and read it", "We don't want to make it easy for spammers" How are these even answers?It would be helpful, when all of this is finalized, to have a "Decentralized Governance by Blockchain" for dummies, with easy-to-follow instructions on how to prepare a proposal, view a proposal, and vote on a proposal, for all of the people who are currently lost such as me!
If someone sends me the info ELI5, I could create this guide, and buster and tungfa could create the vids...
Hi coingun, where have you been? Nice to have you back. There's not much to this, so take some time to do some testing on testnet and you can see it's not a big bluff that can confuse anyone.This is my entire point. To me there is less then probably 5-10 ppl that actually know whats going on...Everyone else is staring at pages and pages of info that is almost impossible to sort through. "Just go back and read it", "We don't want to make it easy for spammers" How are these even answers?
If people have no idea what we are doing or how to do it why would we think anything other then the 5-10 people would be able to even submit a proposal? When we first started this only masternode's could submit proposal's, now unless it's changed again every wallet can submit a proposal? People are confused.
If you are confused please say EYYYYYYYE!
Hi coingun, where have you been? Nice to have you back. There's not much to this, so take some time to do some testing on testnet and you can see it's not a big bluff that can confuse anyone.
Yes, me too. If i was away and come back i would have some respect for people who have been doing the work, coding, testing, whatever, and just would have some respect for them before saying this is confusing .. BLAH BLAH BLAH....I like that... I found participating has been a great way to learn, and when I get confused I need only ask in this thread and I get help
to all : when this update is released to mainnet there will ofcourse be official documentation describing in detail each step
towards putting up a budget proposal. A preview of that documentation can be found on github already :
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/commit/71c73c12c6a2ff67a443d95b07801ec99d19dbc5
@echo off
for /f "tokens=1-4 delims=.:/- " %%a in ("%time%") do (set curtime=%%a;%%b;%%c)
"C:\PATH\dash-cli" -datadir="C:\PATH" masternodelist full > "C:\PATH\out.%curtime%.txt"
pause
I
oaxaca, I thought the website had to be a json page? Does any html page work?
FYI, Current hard fork scheduled on mainnet is around September 6th, 2015 at #328008 as commented in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/0d625c888d3b3fa51768ea92a2d0118eb5ea1bad/src/main.cpp#L1572So do we still go mainnet tomorrow?