v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

[crowning]

Omg.. cool. But it didn't show on my tx screen as IX.

InstantX®....works even when you don't use it!

 

[moli]

OK, we just switched to DGW. Make sure you're on the correct chain:

getblockhash 2021
00000013d22a64083c48775e007f19482d02a7f69b82fd2c6d2b3914049dc60a

I'm on the right chain!

13:31:10
getblockhash 2021
13:31:10
00000013d22a64083c48775e007f19482d02a7f69b82fd2c6d2b3914049dc60a

 

[qwizzie]

InstantX®....works even when you don't use it!

View attachment 968

to be honest i dont think InstantX worked in that transaction (0 of 20 signatures), i think it was POW confirmed.

 

[moli]

to be honest i dont think InstantX worked in that transaction (0 of 20 signatures), i think it was POW confirmed.

Because it still had 0 signature?

 

[qwizzie]

Because it still had 0 signature?

yeah.. the blocks go so fast now that it get very fast POW confirmed .. eventhough the amount will have been instantly added to the receiver total, its the MN confirmations thats still bugged

 

[eduffield]

Can anyone running a masternode on 1.16 get me their debug.log?

 

[moli]

yeah.. the blocks go so fast now that it get very fast POW confirmed .. eventhough the amount will have been instantly added to the receiver total. Its the MN confirmations thats still bugged

I think the next message could say if IX failed or not.

 

[qwizzie]

I think the next message could say if IX failed or not.

yep .. or it just mentions number of confirmations (in this case POW confirmations)
That happened to me once.. InstantX failed but msg just showed number of POW confirmations

 

[crowning]

to be honest i dont think InstantX worked in that transaction (0 of 20 signatures), i think it was POW confirmed.

Not in those 60 seconds I've waited before I sent it to another wallet. I guess the display is wrong.

 

[qwizzie]

Not in those 60 seconds I've waited before I sent it to another wallet. I guess the display is wrong.

what works :

amount added to receiver total Instantly

what doesnt work :

InstantX confirmed by reaching a set number of MN signatures (20 of 20), if this isnt reached then InstantX shows a failure msg.

 

[moli]

I guess it's still pretty much based on what Evan said in his video?
qwizzie must have watched that video a thousand times.
We need to watch it again then! :grin:

 

[BrainShutdown]

Can anyone running a masternode on 1.16 get me their debug.log?

Sent.

 

[Lukas_Jackson]

send me please 1000 to y4zTP4qHrEHkgoVFgEFvshAFpsXBRmJ3N7
and few here xwXXHupAEAnKABCG4BUdwmFRCYNgXuuZQW

Thanks

 

[qwizzie]

send me please 1000 to y4zTP4qHrEHkgoVFgEFvshAFpsXBRmJ3N7
and few here xwXXHupAEAnKABCG4BUdwmFRCYNgXuuZQW

Thanks

done..

 

[moli]

send me please 1000 to y4zTP4qHrEHkgoVFgEFvshAFpsXBRmJ3N7
and few here xwXXHupAEAnKABCG4BUdwmFRCYNgXuuZQW

Thanks

100 tdrk sent.

Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 10 node(s)Date: 2/8/2015 14:20To: Lukas xwXXHupAEAnKABCG4BUdwmFRCYNgXuuZQWDebit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -100.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 6a61a994aaec32503ec78d4579ed333b56fac4a772181f68ea46cb435108d596-000

 

[whocares]

Send some here .

y8TfKjwyk9F4XfHFR8DuHSQn8PQnjvqfUm
yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx

Thanks!

 

[droptable]

yCcUrKbFYvtLwTL3JseCHSof2axceZyaUZ

 

[moli]

Send some here .

y8TfKjwyk9F4XfHFR8DuHSQn8PQnjvqfUm
yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx

Thanks!

100 tdrk sent to each address.

Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 10 node(s)Date: 2/8/2015 14:22To: whocares yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7NdxDebit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -100.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 2fe3d083be7f5be126ea4a97555bb7b527aeb67c8129c6ac719c6606baf06958-000

 

[moli]

yCcUrKbFYvtLwTL3JseCHSof2axceZyaUZ

100 sent!
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 10 node(s)Date: 2/8/2015 14:23To: droptable yCcUrKbFYvtLwTL3JseCHSof2axceZyaUZDebit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -100.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 07d4e5a7f549c45a143787922da723d75eec6f5f0961eaa57f75926831329c5e-000

 

[droptable]

thx