v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been sending out 10 dark at a time (mostly) with DarkSend enabled. I still had 109 + DS balance, but I think I ran out of 1+ DS denominated funds to use. I'm pretty sure each time, I was using nothing but 1.001 denominations and I'm wondering why I didn't have enough 10.001 denominations to do this more often. I guess in real life people wouldn't constantly send 10, and also, if they did, they'd probably have their wallets break things down more as time went on, whereas I stopped DS 'cause I turned on my MN.

But just in case there is a logic problem, I thought I'd mention I ran out ;)
 
moli said:
I think the devs just want us to test the transactions and report, while they're trying to work out the internal issues with InstantX such as security. And we not only have regular type of coins, we also have anonymized coins, so I would just test and see if there's any difference between sending a non-DS/IX transaction and a DS/IX transaction, and if there's any difference in InstantXing a small amount vs. a large amount. I'm not sure if the cosmetic part is important right now.
Click to expand...
I understand that moli, but Evan is also talking about releasing this right away, and I'm saying it should have this before it's released 'cause you're just gonna get very a confused mass of people ;)

So if an interface is too hard to do, ok, but if it's easy enough, it ought to be done before release, that's all :)
 
Talon, yes I did.

Status: 55 confirmations
Date: 2/6/15 13:07
From: unknown
To: y9fejP7BWPjjoQoSvVmoSiK5G4jw2WxYyx (own address, label: Ping Pong IX)
Credit: 0.10 tDRK
Net amount: +0.10 tDRK
Transaction ID: eb5adff4849f81365bf997575e910111d308d98e4e562920a912b8f793062294-000
Click to expand...
 
************************************** 11.1.12 ***************************************

Add this to your config, "addnode=128.127.106.235" if you have any trouble finding peers. IX should work nearly 100% of the time with this version, if so I'll release a 11.1.13 with a better fix for the underlying issue, after that we should be pretty solid.

- Version / Protocol bump / min protocol version
- Extra debugging for IX
- Removed IX vote propagation rules

Compiling: If you get a 404 please try again in a bit

Source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/tree/v0.11.1.x

Windows 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...11/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/darkcoin-qt.exe

Mac OS X:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DR...-osx-darkcoin-dist/darkcoin-0.11.1.10-osx.dmg

Linux 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/.../gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...15/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoind

Linux 64bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/.../gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...15/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoind
 
moli said:
Another larger IX (no DS) transaction:
In what case does it get 0/confirmed?

View attachment 924
Click to expand...

"InstantX verification in process" means the network is looking at the transaction and waiting for signatures in order to lock the inputs. These transactions will always say 0/unconfirmed until the threshold of signatures is met, which is 15 currently.

"Verified via InstantX" means it gathered at least 15 signatures and has locked the transaction. It means it's safe and block-level/transaction-level locks are in place to protect the money from being double spent.

After five minutes if enough signatures aren't collected you'll see "InstantX verification failed", which means the transaction will fall back on proof-of-work validation.
 
Only showing 4 masternodes, must be why instantX not going..
{
"128.127.106.235:20005" : 1,
"128.127.106.235:20002" : 1,
"128.127.106.235:20001" : 1,
"188.226.223.5:19999" : 1
}

and why not all on 19999 port?
 
29 masternodes listed.

eduffield said:
Is everyone confused by how instantX is described on the transaction screen? What would make it better?
Click to expand...

Yeah Evan. For example, I just set depth=18, and sent some coins only with IX

Status: 18 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 20 node(s)
Date: 2/6/15 17:09
To: splawik21 yKM7cfYhL3qe4gJLs8ki6xDW1igXa82MJc
Debit: -1.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -1.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: cfaddcb22bb80c1ea8d384c0532142e2cdb0370834c9026904454fcf1c6f6c37-000
Click to expand...

I'm not sure in this case, but before hen I had (lol) 256, it would cap out at 60. But thats not the case. When I sent, I had 60 confirms, but the recipients I ping-pong'ed with receive IX with 6 confirms. The inverse also happened, people had the default 6, but I would get 60. So how does this go?

In this case I sent Splawik 1 tDRK with 18 IX confirms, should he receive 18 at his end too?
 
eduffield said:
Is everyone confused by how instantX is described on the transaction screen? What would make it better?
Click to expand...
I don't know how hard this would be to implement, but I think that another column on the transaction screen dealing with InstantX specifically next to the POW timeclock wold be beneficial with a red yellow green to indicate whether or not InstantX was successful. If no InstantX transaction, it could show N/A.

So it would be InstantX column, POW column, and then the rest.

Is that doable? Would make it a lot clearer whether InstantX was successful to the Dummies like me...

InstantX verification in progress- YELLOW
verified by InstantX - GREEN CHECK
InstantX failed - RED
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yidakee said:
Not really as we're still bound by static IP. Having said that, those MN's are all under the same IP!! I'm not networking guy
Click to expand...

Code: 
    "128.127.106.235:20005" : 1,
    "104.238.133.211:19999" : 1,
    "128.127.106.235:20004" : 1,
    "128.127.106.235:20002" : 1,
    "128.127.106.235:20001" : 1,

4 active masternodes with the same IP :wink:
 
eduffield, where can I get the information on how to configure multiple masternodes on the same IP?
I would like to try to run them on an Rpi 2 and see how many can I stuff in there :smile:
 
BrainShutdown said:
eduffield, where can I get the information on how to configure multiple masternodes on the same IP?
I would like to try to run them on an Rpi 2 and see how many can I stuff in there :smile:
Click to expand...
I'm sure it all comes down to setting the port and configuring forwarding however, pretty sure this ability is getting removed as it really centralizes masternodes. At least I thought I remember reading that somewhere recently (within the past month or so).
 
BrainShutdown said:
eduffield, where can I get the information on how to configure multiple masternodes on the same IP?
I would like to try to run them on an Rpi 2 and see how many can I stuff in there :smile:
Click to expand...
This is valid for mainnet too?
So from one vps with better cpu+ram we can run multiples MNs with only one static IP?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top