v0.11.0.x Core Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
a lot of masternodes on 70051

16:11:00

masternode list protocol

{
"108.61.166.232:19999" : 70051,
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 70051,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 70052,
"211.99.224.174:19999" : 70051,
"211.99.224.162:19999" : 70051,
"108.61.199.31:19999" : 70051,
"188.40.57.201:19999" : 70052,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 70051,
"108.61.198.220:19999" : 70051,
"54.67.108.201:19999" : 70052,
"92.222.19.36:19999" : 70052,
"107.191.48.59:19999" : 70051,
"54.67.108.206:19999" : 70052,
"108.61.164.106:19999" : 70051,
"54.67.109.227:19999" : 70052,
"107.191.48.59:19999" : 70051,
"211.99.224.172:19999" : 70051,
"104.33.210.231:19999" : 70051,
"211.99.224.173:19999" : 70051,
"85.214.22.190:19999" : 70052,
"127.0.0.4:19999" : 70051,
"104.156.253.63:19999" : 70052,
"198.50.148.87:19999" : 70052,
"176.126.241.100:19999" : 70052,
"92.222.10.179:19999" : 70052,
"188.226.223.5:19999" : 70052
}

gives problems with mixing, a lot of ''no compatible masternode found'' msg's
 
qwizzie said:
few observations :

- when Darksending or sending out transactions using any available funds a lot of information is given about the valua of that transaction (Tdrk, mtDRK, utDark,Tduffs),
perhaps a bit too much info for my taste..

- making new receiving addresses is now in bitcoin style (through file, selecting receiving addresses) instead of adding it directly in the receive tab, to be honest i liked the
previous method more.. maybe i just need to get used to it.
Click to expand...

It took us weeks to get this features integrated :)
If you prefer the old wallet, just use it.
 
cli has issues with balance:

Code: 
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet getbalance
2374.32571972
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 2374
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 2373
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 2370
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 2300
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 2000
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet sendtoaddress yC9asqmY2d4x4MDV9dpgSRVrrM7NxdFNxu 1000
22763e2fe0f318a3e595a5739346c3315c9d5d9cc4bfbc7a8a4a0eff7ae05c3d
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet getunconfirmedbalance
0.00000000
vertoe@euclid:~$ darkcoin-cli --testnet getbalance
1374.32451972
 
vertoe said:
It took us weeks to get this features integrated :)
If you prefer the old wallet, just use it.
Click to expand...

Its just some observations, some feedback sort to speak. A lot of hard work has been put into this new update,
i saw it on github and i'm noticing it while i'm testing it .. i didnt mean to offend anyone with my post.
 
qwizzie said:
Its just some observations, some feedback sort to speak. A lot of hard work has been put into this new update,
i saw it on github and i'm noticing it while i'm testing it .. i didnt mean to offend anyone with my post.
Click to expand...
offense taken!

j/k :wink:

we are porting all the cool features from the bitcoin code base. more to come :)
 
Are we supposed to have these? Payments to yourself -0.1

JnTM8ph.jpg
 
jpr said:
Are we supposed to have these? Payments to yourself -0.1

JnTM8ph.jpg
Click to expand...
As I remember yes (don`t know if this version too) but it could happen randomly to very different users during denominations. I have 16 already but all are 0.00
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpr
jpr said:
Are we supposed to have these? Payments to yourself -0.1
Click to expand...

Thats a rare fee that happens even at Mainnet right now, just keep an eye out to see if you get more of those rare 0.1 fees (you shouldnt get them often)
 
Submitted Denom for 6 wallets running at the same time with roughly the same total balance / amount to mix : 100+10+1+0.1+ND

2x : Submitted to masternode, waiting for more entries (1/2)
4x : Darksend is idle / No compatible masternode found
 
vertoe said:
offense taken!

j/k :wink:

we are porting all the cool features from the bitcoin code base. more to come :)
Click to expand...
Loving what I am seeing so far.

What does the Try Mix and Reset do? Maybe I missed where it was answered.
 
qwizzie said:
Thats a rare fee that happens even at Mainnet right now, just keep an eye out to see if you get more of those rare 0.1 fees (you shouldnt get them often)
Click to expand...

Instead of charging fees for every darksend transaction, the fees are charged randomly (1 in 40 transactions). This means you can't tie the fees to specific users, but the system still has a cost associated with it, so it can't be abused. So you should see these fees, but they'll be rare.
 
eduffield said:
Instead of charging fees for every darksend transaction, the fees are charged randomly (1 in 40 transactions). This means you can't tie the fees to specific users, but the system still has a cost associated with it, so it can't be abused. So you should see these fees, but they'll be rare.
Click to expand...
indeed i`ve received one as well for 0,0002 tdrk - funny amount.
 
eduffield said:
Instead of charging fees for every darksend transaction, the fees are charged randomly (1 in 40 transactions). This means you can't tie the fees to specific users, but the system still has a cost associated with it, so it can't be abused. So you should see these fees, but they'll be rare.
Click to expand...
I know we discussed this during the coin expo, but with the new precision matching system, DS seems to be flying. Granted, I'm not completely through 8 rounds yet but I only started about 17 minutes ago and already in round 5. Assuming DS takes less than an hour, what are your thoughts on making 8 rounds the default in order to keep the pathway of odds up for following coins through the blockchain?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top