v0.10.17.x Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
thelonecrouton said:
Propulsion sent 1DRK from the QT started with --instantxdepth=6 to mtuET9MwFsL5jMWXwiN3Rdo1WyND7uG99q
Click to expand...
Right back at you. One with darksend the other without.


{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mhdwmP5F7mpmkMY2xW46SVPxZVUFtW14yJ",
"category" : "darksent",
"amount" : -10.83400000,
"fee" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 0,
"txid" : "38158ad647aefbdc04bd4eb282894e25db0f2ccc045c707b022f0000f72a652f",
"time" : 1417115414,
"timereceived" : 1417115414
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mhdwmP5F7mpmkMY2xW46SVPxZVUFtW14yJ",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.00000000,
"fee" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 0,
"txid" : "facb76cf0e42be0bfc958a3e05abb2afd11d959514e09da291566b8681bef915",
"time" : 1417115431,
"timereceived" : 1417115431
}
]
 
Any of you fine gents or gals mind sending this poor fool some tDRKs for a tMN ?
And/or some extra for some instantX ping-pong ?

myy68698XcBQsnZjCV9Wh6Ax3vvfPzHafw
 
thelonecrouton said:
Incoming ... in 50 dribbles, just for fun.
Click to expand...

Crouton, no 50 in my tx history... ??

Woooaaah... I was just finishing downloading the chain...

539Y1gC.png


ONQQ71J.png


Moli, yes... that one worked! Thanks! The 1155.1958 was the faucet

damn... I seem to be getting dust non-stop!

u2LxijO.png
 
Testing my new spam-tx script yidakee, I am calling it 'spew' :cool:

Is it showing as confirmed in your overviewpage?

edit: how does one get confirmed balance via the CLI?
 
Propulsion said:
Right back at you. One with darksend the other without.


{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mhdwmP5F7mpmkMY2xW46SVPxZVUFtW14yJ",
"category" : "darksent",
"amount" : -10.83400000,
"fee" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 0,
"txid" : "38158ad647aefbdc04bd4eb282894e25db0f2ccc045c707b022f0000f72a652f",
"time" : 1417115414,
"timereceived" : 1417115414
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mhdwmP5F7mpmkMY2xW46SVPxZVUFtW14yJ",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.00000000,
"fee" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 0,
"txid" : "facb76cf0e42be0bfc958a3e05abb2afd11d959514e09da291566b8681bef915",
"time" : 1417115431,
"timereceived" : 1417115431
}
]
Click to expand...

InstantX requires 10 masternodes, we only have 5 atm.
 
Actually it was 1DRK split into 50 random chunks. Will now send you 100 split into 27...

When there are a few more MNs up I am going to see what it takes to cook them.


Seeing lots of this on stdout:
ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Already Have Transaction Lock Request: 23.23.186.131:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17/ : accepted 0373fa352e2fd5b11e8708b673045031595b30ba221105a016e750deb635bb7e
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thelonecrouton said:
Incoming ... in 50 dribbles, just for fun.
Click to expand...

I think there may be a bug in your script. Dribble spew do not stop rolling in. I exported the csv, and more came after it, but the forum engine does not allow to attatch csv or zip files. If you want it PM me your email !

EDIT... Ok didnt see your recent post. Maybe that was it
EDIT2 : confirmations seem to have stopped a while ago.

Anyone have the testnet explorer handy ?

.
 
Ok, I think I have a problem. blockchain is sync'ing, but tx are not confirming.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 11/27/14 11:21
From: unknown
To: myy68698XcBQsnZjCV9Wh6Ax3vvfPzHafw (own address, label: Testenet 1)
Credit: 0.03221965 DRK
Net amount: +0.03221965 DRK
Transaction ID: fbb563adbe5e8ede543c22957d9243660e156c2b20dd89643160f90faee3c72c
Click to expand...

Stuck on the selected one. Closed and started the QT twice now. Blocks are up to height. Never seen this happen before. Ideas?

pZeEQUm.png
 
current block = 70632 .. i think we need more hashpower to get to the next block so the transactions get confirmed.

edit 1: or more patience..
edit 2: okay more of my transactions from faucet are getting confirmed now...
edit 3 : i'm doing some mixing to start things off, someone pls give a shout when we reach 10 MN's
 
No no... a few blocks have passed since I got the tx.

2 more, still zero confirmations... look at the timestamps

vq0pgXX.png
 
Should I -rescan ? Doesnt really make sense as they're sitting right there. Crouton, what does it show your end?

qwizzie said:
lets give it a bit more time .. some of my clients are slowly confirming by now (only 1 client to go and they are all 5 confirmed).
Click to expand...

yeah, but I've got zero confirms from that tx onwards for several blocks. Explorer does not recognise the hash. Either the network forked with zero hash power or I find no logical explanation.

Awaiting instructions!

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top