People can think that. They would be thinking wrong.
v0.10.17 - Onyx v3
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
People can think that. They would be thinking wrong.
B
buster
Guest
Some of the MN on drk.mn show 0.10.17.20 - Majority show 0.10.17.19 - I don't see another download or udpate posts for .20?
.20 certainly doesn't look like it will be a necessary update so we can sit tight at .19. Appears to be mostly related to debug output.
https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commit/25a07f105462500f6da93a5344c66b3499b50da5
B
buster
Guest
Okay great thank you. I updated last night went to bed, woke up saw that, on my way to work and I was like whhaaaa!! haha. Anyways good job on all the updates guys, and thanks for the info orangecycle.
Trying to denominate on V3 but keep getting dseep msgs.
Is this normal?
Is this normal?
Code:
2014-12-05 15:59:51 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-12-05 15:59:51 AcceptToMemoryPool (tx): 176.126.247.191:9999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.19/ : accepted 9b62cd34d743043073d3f1e1026d8b545f427dfeec4e1c45300eaf3518a564e2 (poolsz 9)
2014-12-05 15:59:51 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(2408f5405306ec5e57853d32c2853ccf72849ef781ebe85bdb7d38e2297278fd, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:51 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(cf32d891a3b8122e1bafc65bc841594d2e89d65893b8c27456a97bb83d603bb4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:51 dseep - Asking source node for missing entry CTxIn(COutPoint(cf32d891a3b8122e1bafc65bc841594d2e89d65893b8c27456a97bb83d603bb4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:51 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(cf32d891a3b8122e1bafc65bc841594d2e89d65893b8c27456a97bb83d603bb4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:51 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(cf32d891a3b8122e1bafc65bc841594d2e89d65893b8c27456a97bb83d603bb4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(cf32d891a3b8122e1bafc65bc841594d2e89d65893b8c27456a97bb83d603bb4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(bd8c364673a8d7acbd8320ccc9598c6fd6b4036461b567e6203f1c6827dd5ee8, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Asking source node for missing entry CTxIn(COutPoint(bd8c364673a8d7acbd8320ccc9598c6fd6b4036461b567e6203f1c6827dd5ee8, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(bd8c364673a8d7acbd8320ccc9598c6fd6b4036461b567e6203f1c6827dd5ee8, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(e1580a60dcaa038cc1fe6b8a8528a146ba7c66e5592ebeb1cdee047caa71aaf7, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Asking source node for missing entry CTxIn(COutPoint(e1580a60dcaa038cc1fe6b8a8528a146ba7c66e5592ebeb1cdee047caa71aaf7, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(bd8c364673a8d7acbd8320ccc9598c6fd6b4036461b567e6203f1c6827dd5ee8, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(bd8c364673a8d7acbd8320ccc9598c6fd6b4036461b567e6203f1c6827dd5ee8, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(e1580a60dcaa038cc1fe6b8a8528a146ba7c66e5592ebeb1cdee047caa71aaf7, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(f87abb479826b9d6b4dd3046e6c4f85983fae510234d6b2d52a23b06880cab50, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Asking source node for missing entry CTxIn(COutPoint(f87abb479826b9d6b4dd3046e6c4f85983fae510234d6b2d52a23b06880cab50, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-12-05 15:59:52 dseep - Couldn't find masternode entry CTxIn(COutPoint(f87abb479826b9d6b4dd3046e6c4f85983fae510234d6b2d52a23b06880cab50, 0), scriptSig=)
oblox
Well-known member
Network is still fragmented between versions. v10.17.20 might fix log spam.
oblox
Well-known member
Probably have to compile yourself, similar to how there was a fix for the ballooning debug logs before but you needed to compile it yourself.
Anyone has their p2pool working with 10.17.19?
SMUT = simple masternode update tool for all of you who think he's a sick fuck.
Nope my testnet p2pool is offline probably cause of the protocol bump waiting for p2pool patch unless you want to manually update version inside networks.py i think.
Edit: ~/p2pool-drk/p2pool/bitcoin/p2p.py:22
version=70049 to version=70051
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't think start-many was being suggested for use on mainnet? I have seen multiple places stating this code isn't production ready and shouldn't be used on mainnet. Am I crazy?
Thanks to moocowmoo for this one:
20:08 <@moocowmoo> p2pool/bitcoin/p2p.py:22
20:08 <@moocowmoo> thats it
Edit that line to read:
Code:
def connectionMade(self):
self.send_version(
version=70051,
services=1,
Code:
def connectionMade(self):
self.send_version(
version=70049,
services=1,
Last edited by a moderator:
drkhouse
Member
How do I get the 10.17.20? don't know where to start to compile...
15.3% are already on the .20
83.4% are on this version .19
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html
15.3% are already on the .20
83.4% are on this version .19
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html
great! thanks!
camosoul
Well-known member
Most people are wrong about pretty much everything. That's why life is so hard for them... When they make the choice not to adopt DRK because they are wrong, they inflict that hurt on themselves and DRK.
Pain may be an excellent teacher, but ignoring the stupid means you suffer their oblivious wrath just the same...
Last edited by a moderator:
camosoul
Well-known member
It's not idiot-proof, but it's not a complicated bit of code... It works fine if you know it's limitations. It's not rocket surgery and all this hyperbole against using it is baseless. In same-session, it actually does check for in-use VINs already assigned... So far, that's 2 people trying to come out in troll mode who haven't even looked at the code...
It's tie-in to announcement was simply neglected. The feature is still there, it just uses a call for announcement that doesn't exist anymore, so it never broadcasts even though it's output suggests everything is fine. It's really a very small detail... I'd fix this little tidbit myself, but it ain't my place. In fact, if I get the time, I may edit the source and compile my own. It's like one freakin' word, not even a whole line of code... There has never been a lower-hanging fruit. It's hanging so low, even my dumb ass can do it...
Last edited by a moderator:
deusstultus
Member
github @ darkcoin/darkcoin
Definitely wasn't attempting to trollmode start on you camo. I was pointing out that both Flare and Evan have said this code isn't robust so only use it at your own risk. I can't seem to find Flare's post but he had an experience where all the vin's got muddled up and had to rebuild manually.
I just don't want to see you have an experience where something goes wrong with an un-supported piece of code and that turns into Darkcoin is totally broken thread.