v0.10.15.x Testing

illodin · Oct 9, 2014

I'm still getting "masternode input must have at least 200 confirmations" with version 101503 windows wallet.

thelonecrouton · Oct 9, 2014

illodin said:
I'm still getting "masternode input must have at least 200 confirmations" with version 101503 windows wallet.

You do need 200 confirmations.

illodin · Oct 9, 2014

thelonecrouton said:
You do need 200 confirmations.

Ok, it was a misunderstanding on my part. Maybe on testnet the requirement could be slightly lower though?

UdjinM6 · Oct 9, 2014

4 tMNs updated. One thing is strange - masternode list result is different on all of them

Code:

{

    "198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.84.193:19999" : 1,
    "176.126.247.191:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.88.75:19999" : 1,
    "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.13:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.14:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.81.45:19999" : 1,
    "92.222.10.179:19999" : 1
}

Code:

{
    "188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
    "92.222.10.179:19999" : 1,
    "198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.84.193:19999" : 1,
    "176.126.247.191:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.88.75:19999" : 1,
    "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.13:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.14:19999" : 1
}

Code:

{
    "107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
    "92.222.10.179:19999" : 1,
    "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
    "198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.13:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.14:19999" : 1
}

Code:

{
    "107.170.157.216:19999" : 1,
    "198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.84.193:19999" : 1,
    "176.126.247.191:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.88.75:19999" : 1,
    "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
    "54.68.81.45:19999" : 1,
    "92.222.10.179:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.13:19999" : 1,
    "202.171.65.14:19999" : 1
}

EDIT: I waited 10+ minutes
EIDT2: I don't know when exactly but after few hours they all seems to be synced

eduffield · Oct 9, 2014

Can someone make me a screen showing "masternode winners" for the last few hundred blocks on a few different nodes? (hint hint elbereth or chap)

BrainShutdown · Oct 9, 2014

3 nodes

Code:

   "44962" : "",
   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

Code:

   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

Code:

   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

EDIT: Missed the word "hundred"

eduffield · Oct 9, 2014

BrainShutdown said:

3 nodes

Code:

   "44962" : "",
   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

Code:

   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

Code:

   "44963" : "",
   "44964" : "",
   "44965" : "",
   "44966" : "",
   "44967" : "",
   "44968" : "",
   "44969" : "",
   "44970" : "",
   "44971" : "",
   "44972" : "",
   "44973" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44974" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
   "44975" : "",
   "44976" : "",
   "44977" : "",
   "44978" : "",
   "44979" : "",
   "44980" : "",
   "44981" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n"

EDIT: Missed the word "hundred"

Hoping for something like this awesome tool: https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

TaoOfSatoshi · Oct 10, 2014

eduffield said:
Hoping for something like this awesome tool: https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

eduffield Liking the subtle wallet changes, I guess I was heard!

I'm helping test a bit on top of getting people into the Dark and bugging the CEO of Pheeva today...

thelonecrouton · Oct 10, 2014

Not much anonymisation going on - could a few more people grab some tDRK and hit the big rectangular button?

TaoOfSatoshi · Oct 10, 2014

What are you trying to denominate? I will set mine up for it..

Miner237 · Oct 10, 2014

TaoOfSatoshi said:
What are you trying to denominate? I will set mine up for it..

My wallet is configured for 5 drk / 3 round completed after about 10 min waiting

If anyone has new wallets address please post I will darksend some test coins mine is

mk3M8JSgCKe6zNJ1GnssNpddVkUHWB3sLe

g8F98FF3gjafogj4 · Oct 10, 2014

Just succesfuly started my two amazon instances as tMNs, but am still receiving payments for them on mainnet! Bug explained here!! http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-99

Miner237 · Oct 10, 2014

g8F98FF3gjafogj4 said:
Just succesfuly started my two amazon instances as tMNs, but am still receiving payments for them on mainnet! Bug explained here!! http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-99

Wouldn't the PrivKey from MAINNET not work if testnet=1 .... different address spaces?

g8F98FF3gjafogj4 · Oct 10, 2014

Miner237 said:
Wouldn't the PrivKey from MAINNET not work if testnet=1 .... different address spaces?

To be honest, I think for one of the MNs, I generated a new genkey and put it in the conf, and for the other I left the conf key the same as maiinnet. Both started fine on testnet. Can cross check if it matters.

Edit: A friend said using the same key for both main and test net led to a rejection, which leads me to doubt that I left one same as main net.

g8F98FF3gjafogj4 · Oct 10, 2014

Though the way I keep my records is not very good at all, it appears that I generated 2 unique keys on testnet to use.

*The keys in the current conf config seem to conflict with what I have on record as being the mainnet keys, but I can be sloppy and this is not a guarantee.

**IF Evan would like identifying information, I would *be happy too research PGP and email it to him.

**not me but looks like a less greedy version of tq http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html?srch&nmstr=XhBLSR1HhoaWrdGgrjCHxJkCWWiFFhveHs

Miner237 · Oct 10, 2014

"45130" : "mpMVevHGJCuBpqxFqbah1dgkSDnyi58nTb",
"45131" : "mvK4V9LsPZvjgCaEPGq5d9b8xfKf3LiETt",
"45132" : "myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu",
"45133" : "n43UCKkMybVQ7bFBfyZ2wJciHTetheyuc1"

EDIT
my other wallet only has these two
"45140" : "mpV2d8vgC7LQNNzXzS3E84TMdykQQvHvkX",
"45141" : "n15eS391XV1KMooJSX6GcWAwMDP43ojXtL"

illodin · Oct 10, 2014

I just woke up and went to start my tMN's because they would've had 200 confirms by now. One of the tMN's had an incoming transaction for 15.015 tDRK with type "Mined". I'm not mining with the node, and the masternode wasn't started because it didn't have the 200 confirms previously.

Debug.log: https://cdn.anonfiles.com/1412921837131.zip

Transaction details:

Status: 10 confirmations
Date: 10/10/2014 06:08
Source: Generated
Credit: 15.015 DRK (matures in 110 more blocks)
Net amount: 0.00 DRK
Transaction ID: d24206726e86ec83cf0bc1f24e2700c34d5d031d190eba56d44b9ff5adbf30f6

Generated coins must mature 120 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.

Miner237 · Oct 10, 2014

{
"45269" : "mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6",
"45270" : "mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6",
"45271" : "moTGqJBcDTtUpr2a7fSRYLUVNnMtcCME6Z",
"45272" : "n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n",
"45273" : "mg7j7YAhqUbLrN1btxZcnhW18ydCk7wACh",
"45274" : "mpCjmn7rKUs6TcXeXxTKoBK1wtkC1Qsune",
"45275" : "miq9MsJvrdypV1ovpGSYvShBpMX7A5FaqU",
"45276" : "mtBF5aK8sUP8NADWmnq7gC775TePFx42ro",
"45277" : "moTGqJBcDTtUpr2a7fSRYLUVNnMtcCME6Z",
"45278" : "msYvxx52hVZjwDrgi1AHgmNUpxrTg1ctxT",
"45279" : "myKtKKwAnQWXR78QndMu5sjGoovPbu4jkC",
"45280" : "mybEwGJB98ZHEJkNs5Xa2Pps4DxUNMT2Yf",
"45281" : "mtBF5aK8sUP8NADWmnq7gC775TePFx42ro",
"45282" : "mpCjmn7rKUs6TcXeXxTKoBK1wtkC1Qsune",
"45283" : "n15eS391XV1KMooJSX6GcWAwMDP43ojXtL",
"45284" : "mvK4V9LsPZvjgCaEPGq5d9b8xfKf3LiETt",
"45285" : "msYvxx52hVZjwDrgi1AHgmNUpxrTg1ctxT",
"45286" : "mpMVevHGJCuBpqxFqbah1dgkSDnyi58nTb",
"45287" : "mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6",
"45288" : "mg7j7YAhqUbLrN1btxZcnhW18ydCk7wACh",
"45289" : "my55Qww9sToastiaQPrs5cvwm2M8MbDEuf",
"45290" : "moTGqJBcDTtUpr2a7fSRYLUVNnMtcCME6Z",
"45291" : "msYvxx52hVZjwDrgi1AHgmNUpxrTg1ctxT",
"45292" : "msYvxx52hVZjwDrgi1AHgmNUpxrTg1ctxT",
"45293" : "mtBF5aK8sUP8NADWmnq7gC775TePFx42ro",
"45294" : "mrtY9qopFHzyqcXju13xFSE2Py6gVUWL6S",
"45295" : "mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6",
"45296" : "mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6",
"45297" : "mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF",
"45298" : "my55Qww9sToastiaQPrs5cvwm2M8MbDEuf"

eduffield · Oct 10, 2014

illodin said:
I just woke up and went to start my tMN's because they would've had 200 confirms by now. One of the tMN's had an incoming transaction for 15.015 tDRK with type "Mined". I'm not mining with the node, and the masternode wasn't started because it didn't have the 200 confirms previously.

Debug.log: https://cdn.anonfiles.com/1412921837131.zip

Transaction details:

Status: 10 confirmations
Date: 10/10/2014 06:08
Source: Generated
Credit: 15.015 DRK (matures in 110 more blocks)
Net amount: 0.00 DRK
Transaction ID: d24206726e86ec83cf0bc1f24e2700c34d5d031d190eba56d44b9ff5adbf30f6

Generated coins must mature 120 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.

Masternodes actually will start by themselves when they're ready. I guess we'll see alot more of this with the 200 confirmation requirement

thelonecrouton · Oct 10, 2014

eduffield said:
Masternodes actually will start by themselves when they're ready. I guess we'll see alot more of this with the 200 confirmation requirement

Wait, what? I thought flare was joking about the AI thing...

:grin:

So: no need at all any more to do the remote start thing? As long as the MN has the 1000DRK vin and a valid masternodeprivkey etc. in the conf file, it'll just get on with it?

v0.10.15.x Testing

Active member

Well-known member

Active member

Official Dash Dev

Core Developer

Active member

Core Developer

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Core Developer

Well-known member