v0.10.15 - Onyx Release

TaoOfSatoshi · Oct 30, 2014

Light said:
Yes, that was me well, thank YOU for doing a great job with Darkcoin PR.

You are quite welcome! The snowball is rolling nicely...

italx · Oct 30, 2014

I have not been able to get Darksend Mixing to work these last few days using 10.15.16. I thought maybe it was just that no one else was available, but does't seem to be the problem.
Currently on v10.15.17 Mac. After I updated I sent all coins to a new address to see if that would help get things going.
Here's a sample of what I'm seeing in my logs, restated over and over for the last 16 hrs since i started. Set to 1200 coins and 4 rounds in preferences. Only has one .01 collateral charge since I started. Any advice?

2014-10-30 19:37:22 dssu - state: 3 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:37:22 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: 1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 2
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::StatusUpdate - set sessionID to 0
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 249 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9968 new
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 263 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9972 new
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 46 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9966 new
2014-10-30 19:37:27 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ..
2014-10-30 19:37:30 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ...
2014-10-30 19:37:33 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:37:36 ResendWalletTransactions()
2014-10-30 19:37:50 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ..
2014-10-30 19:37:52 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:52 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 2
2014-10-30 19:37:53 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ...
2014-10-30 19:37:56 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:38:03 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:38:03 Darksend is idle
2014-10-30 19:38:16 dssu - state: 3 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:16 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 3
2014-10-30 19:38:22 Submiting Darksend for 614.000000 DRK
2014-10-30 19:38:22 DoAutomaticDenominating --- connected (from queue), sending dsa for 61414814748 - denom 15
2014-10-30 19:38:22 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: 1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 2
2014-10-30 19:38:22 CDarkSendPool::StatusUpdate - set sessionID to 0
2014-10-30 19:38:22 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:38:53 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:53 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 2
2014-10-30 19:39:03 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:39:13 Darksend is idle

tungfa · Oct 30, 2014

Payments are back and all happy ...>

patrolman · Oct 30, 2014

If anyone else has made their way here from BitcoinTalk or Twitter looking for the huge news for Darkcoin, it's been moved to a new thread:

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/bank-secrecy-act-abolished.2788/

TaoOfSatoshi · Oct 30, 2014

Thanks, I had to resend the link to all my "Influencers" on Twitter...

tungfa · Oct 31, 2014

Posted ...>

patrolman · Oct 31, 2014

TaoOfSatoshi said:
Thanks, I had to resend the link to all my "Influencers" on Twitter...

I read the first three posts on the page twice, thinking there must have been something blatantly obvious I was missing

UdjinM6 · Oct 31, 2014

Is there any ETA on next enforcement? Halloween night would be perfect time for this :grin:

moli · Oct 31, 2014

italx said:
I have not been able to get Darksend Mixing to work these last few days using 10.15.16. I thought maybe it was just that no one else was available, but does't seem to be the problem.
Currently on v10.15.17 Mac. After I updated I sent all coins to a new address to see if that would help get things going.
Here's a sample of what I'm seeing in my logs, restated over and over for the last 16 hrs since i started. Set to 1200 coins and 4 rounds in preferences. Only has one .01 collateral charge since I started. Any advice?

2014-10-30 19:37:22 dssu - state: 3 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:37:22 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: 1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 2
2014-10-30 19:37:22 CDarkSendPool::StatusUpdate - set sessionID to 0
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 249 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9968 new
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 263 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9972 new
2014-10-30 19:37:25 Added 46 addresses from 104.131.138.77: 278 tried, 9966 new
2014-10-30 19:37:27 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ..
2014-10-30 19:37:30 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ...
2014-10-30 19:37:33 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:37:36 ResendWalletTransactions()
2014-10-30 19:37:50 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ..
2014-10-30 19:37:52 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:37:52 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 2
2014-10-30 19:37:53 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue ...
2014-10-30 19:37:56 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:38:03 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:38:03 Darksend is idle
2014-10-30 19:38:16 dssu - state: 3 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:16 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 3
2014-10-30 19:38:22 Submiting Darksend for 614.000000 DRK
2014-10-30 19:38:22 DoAutomaticDenominating --- connected (from queue), sending dsa for 61414814748 - denom 15
2014-10-30 19:38:22 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: 1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 2
2014-10-30 19:38:22 CDarkSendPool::StatusUpdate - set sessionID to 0
2014-10-30 19:38:22 Submitted to masternode, waiting in queue .
2014-10-30 19:38:53 dssu - state: 2 entriesCount: 0 accepted: -1 error:
2014-10-30 19:38:53 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 2
2014-10-30 19:39:03 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 3
2014-10-30 19:39:13 Darksend is idle

You can create an issue on JIRA and send your debug log there for Evan and flare:
http://jira.darkcoin.qa/secure/Dashboard.jspa

kryptofoo · Oct 31, 2014

I forgot, how many blocks before a new masternode becomes eligible for selection & payment?

moocowmoo · Oct 31, 2014

kryptofoo said:
I forgot, how many blocks before a new masternode becomes eligible for selection & payment?

Looks like one day. 576 blocks.

Code:

darksend.cpp

1300 bool CMasternodePayments::AddWinningMasternode(CMasternodePaymentWinner& winnerIn)
1301 {
1302     uint256 blockHash = 0;
1303     if(!darkSendPool.GetBlockHash(blockHash, winnerIn.nBlockHeight-576)) {
1304         return false;
1305     }
...

introduced in commit:

Code:

commit 84c90f3c49cd3957b77d5d4567a9a39b2c5f8abe
Author: Evan Duffield <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Oct 13 08:16:14 2014 -0700

    v7, reference block further in the past

and merged into onyx here:

Code:

commit fda2f6ba2b4ba00bf7f901d1e032746ba5042115
Merge: 6c2c1e4 f9c05d3
Author: Evan Duffield <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Oct 16 06:41:45 2014 -0700

    merged onyx

affecting versions v0.10.15.14 and up. (and the v0.10.16.* line)

crowning · Oct 31, 2014

According to elbereth's site all pools which were ready for enforcement with v0.10.15.16 (those who pay 25%) are ready again for v0.10.15.17 enforcement.

Enforcement please :grin:

UdjinM6 · Oct 31, 2014

crowning said:
According to elbereth's site all pools which were ready for enforcement with v0.10.15.16 (those who pay 25%) are ready again for v0.10.15.17 enforcement.

Enforcement please :grin:

How do you know this? :what: I'm not sure if protocol version was bumped for v0.10.15.17 ....

EDIT: getinfo gives me "protocolversion" : 70043

Light · Oct 31, 2014

We need a permanent solution to the 'nicehash' problem. They are now the second biggest pool with 13.7% share. Any suggestions?

Now that 82% of masternodes are on new version, perhaps it is time for the enforcement?

crowning · Oct 31, 2014

Light said:
We need a permanent solution to the 'nicehash' problem. They are now the second biggest pool with 13.7% share. Any suggestions?

Light · Oct 31, 2014

Hypothetically, would it work to DDos the crap out of all the un-collaborating pools and during this window of opportunity, Evan switches enforcement? :tongue:

Edit: Again hypothetically, using a VPN connection and a very simple DDos-ing techniques (like the one shown in the below video) a couple of members of Darkcoin community simultaneously could do that?

Disclamer: I am not proposing or calling for any illegal activity. Just taking advantage of my freedom of speech and trying to have an academic debate on the issue :grin: I am not responsible, so use your own brain.

crowning · Oct 31, 2014

Light said:
Hypothetically, would it work to DDos the crap out of all the un-collaborating pools and during this window of opportunity, Evan switches enforcement? :tongue:

Fighting wrong by doing wrong is wrong.

With enforcement they will be forced to collaborate, that's the better and cleaner solution.

UdjinM6 · Oct 31, 2014

Light said:
Hypothetically, would it work to DDos the crap out of all the un-collaborating pools and during this window of opportunity, Evan switches enforcement? :tongue:

Edit: Again hypothetically, using a VPN connection, a very simple DDos-ing techniques like the one shown in the below video could be used?

Disclamer: I am not proposing or calling for any illegal activity. Just taking advantage of my freedom of speech and trying to have an academic debate on the issue :grin:

'Like' it for some kind of nostalgia :wink:

Light · Oct 31, 2014

crowning said:
Fighting wrong by doing wrong is wrong.

With enforcement they will be forced to collaborate, that's the better and cleaner solution.

Well, I respect your opinion but nicehash refused to pay 80 times during the last 24 hours:)

UdjinM6 · Oct 31, 2014

I guess we need a word from Evan eduffield - what are exact conditions for the next enforcement or is there something needed to be done/fixed before we are ready?

v0.10.15 - Onyx Release

Well-known member

Member

Well-known member

Active member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Active member

Official Dash Dev

Well-known member

Active member

Bovine Bit-flipper

Well-known member

Official Dash Dev

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Official Dash Dev

Well-known member

Official Dash Dev