TroyDASH
Well-known member
Is this still the plan with Evo?
I think a total number of transactions might not be a good determining factor, because it would hurt microtransactions perhaps. Maybe it should instead assess it by total value of transactions, or maybe a certain threshold of whichever is greater (if X transactions are reached, OR when Y value in transactions over Z period is reached, whichever is greater)? I just don't see any advantage to locking out microtransactions.
The actual cost to the network is dependent on the number/size of transactions, and is not at all dependent on the value of the transactions, which is one reason to limit the free-transaction subsidy via the former way and not the latter.