Fees are calculated based on tx size, not amount sent.just tried sending +/- 20 DRK with the 9.12.26, but didn't get a dialog to pay a transaction fee. Checking the block explorer it is sent with 0.00 fee. Is this correct or a small bug?
Small transactions dont require fees.just tried sending +/- 20 DRK with the 9.12.26, but didn't get a dialog to pay a transaction fee. Checking the block explorer it is sent with 0.00 fee. Is this correct or a small bug?
It's generating transactions. Just leave the wallet alone a bit, it will settle down soon.Am I really the only person experiencing massive CPU load and 30 second lag in the linux qt client? I'm using Xubuntu 14.04 and never had this issue before either on main-net or recently in test-net.
1-5% for me, nothing unusual, no lags at allAm I really the only person experiencing massive CPU load and 30 second lag in the linux qt client? I'm using Xubuntu 14.04 and never had this issue before either on main-net or recently in test-net.
No, but the operator is on IRC.Are you behind suchpool?
23:38:34 CryptoSiD | im updating suchpool right now
23:38:35 CryptoSiD | to RC4
23:38:41 vertoe | ok
23:38:46 vertoe | that's what I want to hear!
23:38:52 CryptoSiD | once we kick our next block
23:38:56 CryptoSiD | since we'Re at 350%
23:39:00 CryptoSiD | ha
23:39:01 CryptoSiD | we just did
23:39:12 CryptoSiD | but
23:39:13 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:10 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (0 -> 1)
23:39:13 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:10 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:39:13 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (1 -> 2)
23:39:13 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 ProcessMessage(dsee, 249 bytes) FAILED
23:39:13 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (2 -> 3)
23:39:14 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 ProcessMessage(dsee, 249 bytes) FAILED
23:39:14 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (3 -> 4)
23:39:14 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:39:14 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (4 -> 5)
23:39:15 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 ProcessMessage(dsee, 249 bytes) FAILED
23:39:15 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 Misbehaving: 68.109.196.204:9999 (5 -> 6)
23:39:16 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:38:11 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:39:20 vertoe | at least one major pool updating is enough for me.
23:39:39 CryptoSiD | im not sure i trust this
23:39:42 CryptoSiD | to update the pool with it
23:39:49 CryptoSiD | why the fuck are we getting all those error
23:39:52 CryptoSiD | in debug.log
23:40:01 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:39:08 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:40:01 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:39:08 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:40:01 CryptoSiD | 2014-08-13 21:39:10 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:40:06 CryptoSiD | this is flooding the debug.log
23:40:21 CryptoSiD | im not updating till its fixed
23:41:16 elberethzone | CryptoSiD: probably an old node
23:42:11 CryptoSiD | ive been saying this here everyday
23:42:16 CryptoSiD | since thr rc4 beta is out
23:42:24 CryptoSiD | it need to be fixed
23:42:45 CryptoSiD | i won't update suchpool cause i dont trust this error flooding debug.log
23:43:35 CryptoSiD | can seomeone report this on DCT
23:43:37 CryptoSiD | ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED
23:43:58 CryptoSiD | the debug.log is getting this line from 3 to 10 time every second.
Hmmm, been an hour now and this is on an i5 @ 2.6GHz, no rocketship but it's not exactly slow normally either. Just thought, would having an encrypted HDD slow things up? As I say though, never experienced this on testnet with <=v25.It's generating transactions. Just leave the wallet alone a bit, it will settle down soon.
Hmmm, been an hour now and this is on an i5 @ 2.6GHz, no rocketship but it's not exactly slow normally either. Just thought, would having an encrypted HDD slow things up? As I say though, never experienced this on testnet with <=v25.
It's generating transactions. Just leave the wallet alone a bit, it will settle down soon.
Nope. I spoke with Evan about it briefly. He is going to implement some optimizations to try and mitigate this moving forward. It should stop once the wallet is finished denominating.Am I really the only person experiencing massive CPU load and 30 second lag in the linux qt client? I'm using Xubuntu 14.04 and never had this issue before either on main-net or recently in test-net.
Thanks eltito! And thanks Vertoe too, debug log shows it slowly but steadily generating keys, (among other things) - currently only up to about 350.Nope. I spoke with Evan about it briefly. He is going to implement some optimizations to try and mitigate this moving forward. It should stop once the wallet is finished denominating.
I'm a bit late, but I got my masternodes up and running, thank you everyone!
P.S. I'm wondering how this works regarding masternodes. If you upgrade, and the block is found by a pool that hasn't upgraded yet, will you still receive the funds? Also, does the miner get to keep the 20% if he upgraded and the designated MN wasn't? (this would be excellent as it would encourage miners to update before the masternodes :tongue: - a nice trap :wink: )
RC4 pools pay RC4 MNs, RC3 pools pay RC3 MNs... I've already had an RC3 pool not pay me because my MNs are RC4, hopefully the major pools will update reasonably quickly... by the look of chaeplins page some RC3 MN got the payment instead.I'm a bit late, but I got my masternodes up and running, thank you everyone!
P.S. I'm wondering how this works regarding masternodes. If you upgrade, and the block is found by a pool that hasn't upgraded yet, will you still receive the funds? Also, does the miner get to keep the 20% if he upgraded and the designated MN wasn't? (this would be excellent as it would encourage miners to update before the masternodes :tongue: - a nice trap :wink: )