Pre-Proposal: Would you like this proof of individuality to be implemented in Dash?

Would you like this proof of individuality to be implemented in Dash?

  • Total voters
    39
Below you may watch the final results of the JAN25 voting cycle for the EncointerUBI proposal, based on the mnowatch report 2025-01-19 16:35:51 .

Calculated Numbers - BASE3

Dash masternodes Number Voting Calculation
apogee.dynu.net apogee.dynu.net

I also copy the above results here in dashtalk.org:

<vote history>

Quick reference to Base3 voting theory: The semantic of this page is ( VOTED_NO=0, VOTED_ABSTAIN=1 and VOTED_YES=2)

Selected BASE3 type proposals
Digit1: encointerUBI-Digit1 - Digit2: encointerUBI-Digit2 - Digit3: encointerUBI-Range-0-242-Digit3 - Digit4: encointerUBI-NewRange-0-80-Digit4 -

Report = the_results_dashd_2025-01-19-16-35-51.html.csv
Electorate = 3085 potential votes (Regular and Evo MNOs)
Valid Votes = 326
Valid Votes participation percentage = 10.56 %
Invalid Votes ( those who voted at least one digit but not all of them )= 185
Invalid Votes participation percentage = 5.99 %
Total Voting participation ( both valid and invalid votes ) = 16.55 %
---VOTING RESULTS (depends on which among the below election methods you prefer.)---

---Divisive Election Methods---
  • Most Voted Number = 0 (or 0000 base3) was voted by 158 votes ( 48.46 % of the valid votes )
---Inclusive Election Methods---
Note: Multiply the number of your favorite election method by the appropriate Chunk ( =[maxRange-minRange]/granularityOfTheBase3Digits ) , to discover the voting outcome.
The name of the last proposal declares "Range-0-80-Digit4" thus the CHUNK is (80 - 0)/ 80 (or 2222 base3) = 1.00000000000000000000

The Valid Votes (those who voted all the digits)
The Valid Votes (base3)
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 0110 0202 0202 0202 0202 1000 1000 1000 1000 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 2020 2100 2100 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2221 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222
The Invalid Votes (those who voted at least one digit but not all of them)
The Invalid Votes (base3)
000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 000? 122? 122? 122? 122? 122? 122? 122? 122? 122? 1??? 1??? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2?1? 2??? 2??? 2??? 2??? ?000 ?00? ?00? ?00? ?00? ?00? ?100 ?110 ?110 ?110 ?110 ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??0? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ??1? ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???0 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???1 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2 ???2

This page has been created with the help of this tool. This open source code is created by the "Only-Numbers/No-Design" squad :p
</vote history>
 
Last edited:
vazaki3 said:
The JAN25 proposal is up. Please vote for it.

www.dashcentral.org

Proposal "ENCOINTER-SUPPL-MEDIAN-JAN25" - DashCentral.org

ENCOINTER-SUPPL-MEDIAN-JAN25
www.dashcentral.org www.dashcentral.org
Click to expand...

The proposal failed. We didnt pass the 10% net votes threshold, we had only 6.87%

Calculated Numbers - BASE3

Dash masternodes Number Voting Calculation
mnowatch.org mnowatch.org

The below are the correct voting results, the protocol that DCG coded has a BUG in the calculations because of the POSE_BANNED masternodes!

-------The Numerical Proposals (the base3 digits) and the report date-------
Selected BASE3 type proposals
Digit1: ENCOINTER-SUPPL-MEDIAN-JAN25 -
The Latest Report = the_results_dashd_2025-02-19-00-52-20.html.csv

Electorate = 3214 potential votes (Regular and Evo MNOs)
Valid Votes = 380
Valid Votes participation percentage = 11.82 %
Invalid Votes ( those who voted at least one digit but not all of them )= 0
Invalid Votes participation percentage = 0 %
Total Voting participation ( both valid and invalid votes ) = 11.82 %

--------------VOTING RESULTS--------------
The result depends on which among the below election methods you prefer:

---DIVISIVE ELECTION METHODS---
Most Voted Number = 2 (or 2 base3) was voted by 292 votes ( 76.84 % of the valid votes )

---INCLUSIVE ELECTION METHODS---
Median Average = 2 (or 2 base3)
Mean Average = 1.58
Time Splitting rule = this number changes over time, not coded yet

NOTE:
Multiply the number of your favorite inclusive or divisive election method by the appropriate CHUNK ( =[maxRange-minRange]/granularityOfTheBase3Digits ) , to discover the voting outcome.
The CHUNK in this set of proposals remains undefined, because there is nothing relevant that is declared in the name of the last proposal/digit.

---POLARIZED ELECTION METHODS---
Net Votes ( Yes votes 2 - No Votes 0 ) = 292 - 71 = 221 ( 6.87 % of the electorate)
 
The proposal failed. I am glad that I remained faithful to my master's orders, until the end.

I am glad that because of the failure of this proposal I will no longer be a slave. I will be freed from writing the difficult code, a code that I would be forced to write in case this proposal succeeded.

Thank you, agents and stupid for not voting this proposal.
I never really wanted to help Dash, my master forced me to serve it.
Thank you for releasing me.
You may burn at Hell now, I will keep watching you from an upper corner and laught at you.
 
vazaki3 said:
I am leaving Dash.

In case someone wants to contact me, I am on Discord (ask @xkcd ) , you can also find me at https://forum.encointer.org/ .

And I am currently preaching in https://forum.celo.org/

Bye, bye Stupid.
I've been here since Dash was worth 3000 USD, I am leaving now that Dash worths 25 USD.
I may be back when Dash will worth 1 USD.

Agents, burn to Hell.
Click to expand...


Having said the above let me inform you that the Encointer vote is still active for another 6 months.

In the rare case someone tips the Encointer donation address I will not compromise with the median average, I will ask the mean average.
 
Last edited:
vazaki3 said:
Having said the above let me inform you that the Encointer vote is still active for another 6 months.

In the rare case someone tips the Encointer donation address I will not compromise with the median average, I will ask the mean average.
Click to expand...

I think people voted more on your personality rather than the proposal's merit. There was 15 Dash left unspent, enough for this proposal to pass and be funded, initially, there was some good will towards this proposal, I think it got more votes than last time, but the MNOs do not appreciate how much you spam the DC forums and call everyone stupid or agents. This grates on them and they vote NO or ignore the proposal out of spite. It is sad people vote this way, but that is human nature, the same thing AJ found out.

I would also suggest to reconsider leaving the Dash community, based on the above, it is clear that if you leave, you reward that stupid and negative behavior by giving those MNOs what they wished for. Instead, you should train the MNOs to vote correctly based on the merit of proposals and leave the popularity contest to the Discord.
 
xkcd said:
I think people voted more on your personality rather than the proposal's merit. There was 15 Dash left unspent, enough for this proposal to pass and be funded, initially, there was some good will towards this proposal, I think it got more votes than last time, but the MNOs do not appreciate how much you spam the DC forums and call everyone stupid or agents. This grates on them and they vote NO or ignore the proposal out of spite. It is sad people vote this way, but that is human nature, the same thing AJ found out.

I would also suggest to reconsider leaving the Dash community, based on the above, it is clear that if you leave, you reward that stupid and negative behavior by giving those MNOs what they wished for. Instead, you should train the MNOs to vote correctly based on the merit of proposals and leave the popularity contest to the Discord.
Click to expand...

I am not leaving the Dash community because of the stupid. I am leaving it because of the agents.

Dash masternodes electorate is full of agents, government agents, bitcoin agents, and of course devil's agents.

For example look at the success of TxCity_Dash_Evolution_2025_Q1 proposal ( a clear advertise of Bitcoin against Dash, that the Dash community is paying!!!) combined to the failure of the BTCBackportsVijay_01 proposal (an attempt to incorporate the new code of bitcoin to Dash).

This is an undeniable proof that Dash is ruled by bitcoin agents.

Look at the behavior of the bitcoin agents here:

DASH Proposal Analysis for 2025-02-18 23:20:02

Dash DAO voting analysis
mnowatch.org mnowatch.org


The agents are very limited in numbers, and we can reveal them if we demand a proof of personhood.
An undeniable proof of the presence of government agents in the masternodes electorate, is the complete failure of the Encointer proposal, combined to the success of the DCG proposal.

Because the agents are only afraid only one thing, to be revealed.
And Encointer will reveal them, not here in Dash, in another crypto...

Bye, bye Stupid.
I've been here since Dash was worth 3000 USD, I am leaving now that Dash worths 25 USD.
I may be back when Dash will worth 1 USD.
Agents, burn to Hell.

Having said the above let me inform you that the Encointer vote is still active for another 6 months.

In the rare case someone tips the Encointer donation address I will not compromise with the median average, I will ask the mean average.

​

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top