Many New Proposals are up - PLEASE VOTE !

[demo]

I don't agree. Let's vote.

Have you vote for all the previous initial decisions made into dash project? Like the 45-45-10 for example? If yes, then you are right when asking to vote also for this one.

But if all previous decisions are not voted, then why do you ask especially for this particular decision to be voted? Isnt it strange, isnt it hypocrisy, that you forgot all the previous decisions, and you insist on this one?

The polls (and the decisions extracted from that polls) are not lonely stars, they depend eachother. Lets vote, not only for this decision you personally dont agree with, but also lets vote for all the previous initial and interdependent decisions. Lets built the voting tree, the tree of knowledge. Voting is the duty of masternode owners. If they dont vote, then they do not deserve to gain benefits from dash. Voting is a job. A serious job, and it should be paid a lot.

 

[demo]

Forcing people to vote does not cause the results that you are expecting to achieve. If voting was mandatory and carried some penalty for failure to vote, I would script up an auto-no or auto abstain so that I didn't loose anything.

This can be solved. This is already solved. This is the captcha technology. You know that, whenever you subscribe to whatever site.
So stop saying about auto-no and auto-abstain scritps. Captcha is already here, for smart guys like you.

 

[halso]

M

Because you should vote whith numbers. This is your destiny. You cannot avoid that. If you are trying to avoid it, this will be your end.

Maybe you should give crypto a rest for a while.

Have u heard of tinder?

 

[demo]

M

Maybe you should give crypto a rest for a while.

Have u heard of tinder?

Voting is the duty of all masternode owners.

If they dont vote, then they do not deserve to gain any benefit from dash. Profit should go only to MNs that vote frequently, and the rest of them should gain nothing.

Voting is a job, a very serious job for dash, and it should be paid a lot. Voting is a personal job, a serious mental job, you should not be allowed to vote using scripts, and this should be checked using captcha technology. And of course voting history should be preserved, so that we can see who votes smart and who votes stupidly.

MNs that avoid to vote, they should give up crypto and dash, they have better go to tinder (or to DAO-ethereum )

 

[UdjinM6]

Voting is the duty of masternode owners. If they dont vote, then they do not deserve to gain benefits from dash.
45% should go only to MNs that vote, and the rest should gain nothing.

Voting is a job. A serious job, and it should be paid a lot.

If MNs dont want to vote, then they should give up crypto and go to tinder.

No, voting is a right, not a job. MNs job is providing network services like PrivateSend and InstantSend and also for being online 24/7 which gives our network very fast sync time for new clients that come online. That's what they are paid for.

You can also think of voting this way: if shareholder doesn't vote, he gets his dividends anyway but he is probably missing the opportunity to change some decisions and therefore he is probably missing the opportunity to gain more (or to save his investments in case things get really bad) if he would participate and vote for the "right" things and/or vote against the "wrong" things instead of abstaining.

 

[demo]

No, voting is a right, not a job. MNs job is providing network services like PrivateSend and InstantSend and also for being online 24/7 which gives our network very fast sync time for new clients that come online. That's what they are paid for.
.

Being online 24/7 means NOTHING! Bandwidth provided to the network is the real important thing. Offering bandwidth is the real service. Being online 24/7 when at the same time your bandwidth is almost zero, this is not a service at all, and those kind of MNs should gain nothing.

Do you measure somehow the bandwidth a MN offers to the network? If you could, this could be a good reason to pay a MN.

Or you could measure how many clients connect to the network and pay MNs on that number. But on the other hand, how do you know that the dash clients are real persons or fake accounts? This is why a web of trust is needed. Or this is why a CAPTCHA is needed, to distinguish between fake dash clients and real persons dash clients.

 

[UdjinM6]

being online 24/7 means NOTHING! Bandwidth provided to the network is important.

Offering bandwidth is the real service. On the other habd being online 24/7 when at the same time your bandwidth is almost zero, this is not a service at all.

Do you measure somehow the bandwidth a MNs offer to the network? Or you could measure how many clients connect to the network and pay MNs on that number.

But on the other hand, how do you know the clients are real or fake? This is why a web of trust is needed. And this is why a CAPTCHA is needed, to distinguish between fake and real dash clients.

IMO there is no need to fix things that are already working. From my experience when a new node goes online most of (almost immediately) connected nodes are masternodes and network bandwidth is never the limiting factor - it's rather CPU or disk of a new node that suffer from incoming data.

 

[demo]

IMO there is no need to fix things that are already working. From my experience when a new node goes online most of (almost immediately) connected nodes are masternodes and network bandwidth is never the limiting factor - it's rather CPU or disk of a new node that suffer from incoming data.

CPU or disk is cheap, bandwidth is expensive.

You should paid MNs per bandwidth. Or per dash clients connected, provided that those clients are real persons (using captcha whenever a dash wallet connects)

 

[UdjinM6]

CPU or disk is cheap, bandwidth is expensive.

You should paid MNs per bandwidth. Or per dash clients connected, provided that those clients are real persons (using captcha whenever a dash wallet opens)

Again, there is no need to complicate and regulate things which are fine already. Network is not paying for MNs expenses, that's not network's business tbh. Network is paying them for services they provide. If MNs like payments and they can pay their expenses - there are more of them, just like if miners like theirs and can pay their expenses - there are more miners.

 

[demo]

Again, there is no need to complicate and regulate things which are fine already. Network is not paying for MNs expenses, that's not network's business tbh. Network is paying them for services they provide. If MNs like payments and they can pay their expenses - there are more of them, just like if miners like theirs and can pay their expenses - there are more miners.

It is not fine. You will create a bubble of MNs , and this will be the cause of dash collapse.

Be smart, dont be like Ethereum and DAO.

You should pay MNs for real services, for rare and valuable services, like the bandwidth is.

My Masternode is not equal to yours, if my Masternode serves 1000 dash wallets and yours serves only 5.

 

[demo]

You should create a blockchain of dashwallet connections.

Each connected dash wallet to a specific masternode shoud be broadcasted to all the rest MNs.
All MNs will sign this connection as being a real one, and this will create a "bandwidh" blockchain.

So that the more dash wallets a Mastenode serves, the more are the masternode's earnings.

The important thing is who verifies the captcha whenever the wallet connects. So the captcha verification should take place to an independant and randomly (using cryptographic randomness) selected masternode , and of course not to the one that the dashwallet initialy connects due to the high bandwidth. And of course captcha service , should also be paid along with the bandwidth service provided to the wallet. How much paid? i Dont know, you should vote using numbers.

 

[tungfa]

You should create a blockchain of dashwallet connections.

Each connected dash wallet to a specific masternode shoud be broadcasted to all the rest MNs, all MNs will sign the connection as being a real one, and this will create a "bandwidh" blockchain.

So that the more dash wallets a Mastenode serves, the more are the masternode's earnings.

i can "smell" some security issues there
+
i am not sure what the issue is - the votes are working fine - Masternodes are doing what they are supposed to
Any general election runs around 45% - just as we are here

 

[demo]

i can "smell" some security issues there
+
i am not sure what the issue is -

The important thing is who verifies the captcha whenever the wallet connects. So the captcha verification should take place to an independant and randomly (using cryptographic randomness) selected masternode , and of course not to the one that the dashwallet initialy connects due to the high bandwidth. And of course captcha service , should also be paid along with the bandwidth service provided to the wallet. How much paid? i Dont know, you should vote using numbers.

Of course you are not sure. It is a complicated thing.

 

[tungfa]

The important thing is to verify the captcha. So the captcha verification should take place to an independant and randomly selected masternode, and of course not to the one that the dashwallet initialy connects. And of course captcha service , should also be paid.

Of course you are not sure. You are a manager, not an IT specialist.

lucky we have u then

 

[demo]

lucky we have u then

Anyway, it is easy to understand the below.

My Masternode is not equal to yours, if my Masternode serves 1000 dash wallets and yours serves only 5.

Just stay on this, then wait for the IT to solve this obvious injustice that will be the cause of dash collapse oneday. Complicated details on how this is solved, is not your job.

 

[halso]

Anyway, it is easy to understand the below.

My Masternode is not equal to yours, if my Masternode serves 1000 dash wallets and yours serves only 5.

Just stay on this, then wait for the IT to solve this obvious injustice that will be the cause of dash collapse oneday. Complicated details on how this is solved, is not your job.

So when are you buying your first dash again?

 

[Pal]

So when are you buying your first dash again?

You do understand this guy is obviously an alt account of someone with an opinion he or she cannot share from the main account for fear of constantly being attacked or discredited & targeted right? He wouldn't be here preaching the same stuff over and over without a reason to be doing so....

But by all means, keep fighting with him, it's rather entertaining tbh.

 

[demo]

So when are you buying your first dash again?

I will buy my first dash whenever dash becomes a fair coin. Until then I do not invest on it.

I have to admit though that dash is one of the fairest cryptocoins among those that use mining technology, by far better than bitcoin or ethereum for example. Thats why I am here, I would like to convince you transform dash into a fair coin, because I believe some people over here (not the majority of course) have good will. And of course because although I know how a fair coin looks like, I have not the skill to create it alone.

So I remain here talking with you for those few persons that have a good will, hoping they will convince dash majority on what the correct road is.

 

[demo]

You do understand this guy is obviously an alt account of someone with an opinion he or she cannot share from the main account for fear of constantly being attacked or discredited & targeted right? He wouldn't be here preaching the same stuff over and over without a reason to be doing so....

But by all means, keep fighting with him, it's rather entertaining tbh.

I have no alternative account. I am dash-less.
The reason I preach is because I want for a coin first to become a fair one, and then to participate on it. Maybe this is due to my character, but I abstain whenever I discover a tiny detail that may lead to unfairness. I am a perfectionist, so I abstain from whatever is not perfect.