Dear
@i-am-sigmund,
thank you for your answers
It's a group account (Google Group / email distribution list), so all the DTPs manage it together, and coordinate who will respond, what we will say, etc.
If you understand what this means legally, this is a friendly remark. I hope that no one flips out like with the previous DTPs and that it doesn't fall on all the new DTPs.
Have you already considered closing DCG if the network decides to do so?
As you know, Dash's voting system allows a very small minority to block a project. And that if they are not satisfied with what the DTPs are bringing about change to DCG, they can simply express their disagreement by blocking funding for DCG. As the community is divided there is more chance for this to happen than when the community was united, from my point of view. We'll see when you propose changes, will they go in the direction of the small destructive minority that is very vocal, or in the direction of the silent majority.
The DCG has been set up to interact with the real world, the institutions, the companies and the talents that evolve in the normal world as employees with known rights and duties. Be careful not to turn it into a unicorn. As a reminder, the DCG has done 90% of the integrations, 99% of the Dash code, for only 60% of the budget. Despite a picture painted publicly by a destructive minority, skewing reality, it is the most successful to date funded by the budget (not to say that it can not be improved).
Be careful not to copy less successful utopian models currently funded by the budget.
Ryan + DCG + DIF = Dashdirect, Who says better ?
Have a nice day.