Sending of IS transactions is possible to implement without the new DIPs; however, there's not a way to actually fully validate incoming IS (since you cannot SPV verify the masternodes).Any update on this? Can IS be implemented using the current Electrum / ElectrumX codebase or is it necessary to wait for deterministic masternode lists before we can have IS on SPV wallets? How do the Android/iOS wallets implement this?
can't it be send to a private MN and get a response? I know its something stupid to ask. Just trying to think out loud.Sending of IS transactions is possible to implement without the new DIPs; however, there's not a way to actually fully validate incoming IS (since you cannot SPV verify the masternodes).
I suppose if you had a private node that you trusted, you may be able to set something up to check for you. Fortunately DIP-4 will make it possible to do directly.can't it be send to a private MN and get a response? I know its something stupid to ask. Just trying to think out loud.
Why would Dash fund something that was impossible to implement?
Fortunately DIP-4 will make it possible to do directly.
I believe, not "all" transactions are IS, but only those which were made with 4 or less inputs with 6+ blockchain confirmations each. So what is the ETA on full InstantSend implementation?Right now all transactions are IS, though they aren't shown as such in the Dash Electrum UI
I believe, not "all" transactions are IS, but only those which were made with 4 or less inputs with 6+ blockchain confirmations each. So what is the ETA on full InstantSend implementation?