T
toknormal
Guest
Hi
I've posted before about my views regarding Dash's dependency on Bitcoin. I've also said that I admire the rivalry and the passion in the ideals of Dash and its community to improve on Bitcoin's flaws and to deliver its original ideals in a true practical implementation where bitcoin was not able to.
My view is that this is achievable as long as things are kept in balance and respect is maintained for the mutual dependency as well as the mutual rivarly. Bitcoin and Dash have far more in common than they have in distinction and - in fact - Dash's base source code IS bitcoin so it inherits many of its properties that Dash benefits from. That was Evan's original ideal in which he made a truly great call.
However, the hawks are starting to circle. Ether, Tezos, Token mania..what is at stake here ? In my opinion no less than the following:
• the integrity of true digital monetary stocks that last versus incidental technological stocks that are transient (Bitcoin gives way to Ether, Ether gives way to Tezos, Tezos gives way to...)
• faith in a digital form of store of value rather than a physical one
• the proof of work concept where each token has a cost of production associated with it that echoes the regulated equity model where your shareholdings are backed by the capital you invest (unlike the current token-market mania)
There are only a few monetary assets left in the top 20 marketcaps. That leaves those that remain in a very powerful position, including Dash. Think of it this way, the monetary assets are gold, silver and diamonds. The rest are corporate stocks - IBM, Microsoft, Shell, British Airways. One can make you more money than the other at various times but it's important to know which one you are and to know who your friends are in times of crisis.
With that I leave you my opinion on the current bitcoin war and that it is not in Dash's interest for it conclude any other way than productively.
I've posted before about my views regarding Dash's dependency on Bitcoin. I've also said that I admire the rivalry and the passion in the ideals of Dash and its community to improve on Bitcoin's flaws and to deliver its original ideals in a true practical implementation where bitcoin was not able to.
My view is that this is achievable as long as things are kept in balance and respect is maintained for the mutual dependency as well as the mutual rivarly. Bitcoin and Dash have far more in common than they have in distinction and - in fact - Dash's base source code IS bitcoin so it inherits many of its properties that Dash benefits from. That was Evan's original ideal in which he made a truly great call.
However, the hawks are starting to circle. Ether, Tezos, Token mania..what is at stake here ? In my opinion no less than the following:
• the integrity of true digital monetary stocks that last versus incidental technological stocks that are transient (Bitcoin gives way to Ether, Ether gives way to Tezos, Tezos gives way to...)
• faith in a digital form of store of value rather than a physical one
• the proof of work concept where each token has a cost of production associated with it that echoes the regulated equity model where your shareholdings are backed by the capital you invest (unlike the current token-market mania)
There are only a few monetary assets left in the top 20 marketcaps. That leaves those that remain in a very powerful position, including Dash. Think of it this way, the monetary assets are gold, silver and diamonds. The rest are corporate stocks - IBM, Microsoft, Shell, British Airways. One can make you more money than the other at various times but it's important to know which one you are and to know who your friends are in times of crisis.
With that I leave you my opinion on the current bitcoin war and that it is not in Dash's interest for it conclude any other way than productively.