Tesquenure
Member
1st dark message mail in privacy
Last edited by a moderator:
Development Update - August 19, 2014
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
Yeah, when he's saying speed he's saying bandwidth. With Tor you experience variable speed, but it is almost always quite slow. The owners of the relays don't get paid, so there is no incentive to pay for good servers.
As for competition and other coins copying us, that is easier said than done. Our masternode network is a competitive advantage quite difficult to replicate. Also, nobody is saying this is gonna be a huge success that everyone will be eager to copy. The market is crowded with VPN providers and competing with them is not gonna be easy at all. We may be able to implement this feature technically and then not be able to sell it to the market. I think this can be a big success, but only with a lot of work that not everyone will be able/eager to do.
In my opinion, the important thing in the announcement is that it shows that the masternode network is valuable and that it can be used for other things.
QuantumExplorer
Administrator
Staff member
Core Developer
Dash Core Group
Founder
Foundation Member
Masternode Owner/Operator
Dash Support Group
Chief Sock Advisor
I wrote an idea I had about how to include a bandwidth cap so it doesn't ruin people running an EC2.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/ho...-profitable-for-people-using-amazon-ec2.2089/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/ho...-profitable-for-people-using-amazon-ec2.2089/
I use vultr and I have a 1000Gb transfer allowance, for this I get a VPS for $5 a month. My MN is using between 500Mb and 1Gb per day at the moment so plenty of headroom there my friends! :tongue:
And if you look at the long term prices are constantly falling and specs increasing for VPS deployments so I don't think we'd ever be in a situation where running a MN would become unprofitable... Famous last words I know...
Competition is inevitable if something is successful and DarkTor would be no different but first mover advantage is very important and a secure 'DRKnet' isn't something that's easy to replicate if you think about it...
First problem is scale. What makes DRKnet secure and private is the whole darkcoin infrastructure, and then the ever growing number of MNs that sit on top of it. I'm not saying that it can't be done but you would need a large group of organized people with deep pockets to get a clone underway, and even then how do you persuade lots of happy users to switch from a solution that works very well for them to take a risk on another solution that's identical but doesn't have the size, scale and reputation of DRK?
The power of the network effect cannot be underestimated and once we are seen as the go to network for anonymous services such as web, email, money transfer, (add services heres...) then it will be very difficult to compete with us without innovating in some other way. Just copying us is very flattering but there's only one facebook, there's only one Ebay, there's only one twitter etc. Yes, they have competition, but the network effect ensures they have complete dominance of their respective markets. DRK would be no different in this instance...
Walter
First problem is scale. What makes DRKnet secure and private is the whole darkcoin infrastructure, and then the ever growing number of MNs that sit on top of it. I'm not saying that it can't be done but you would need a large group of organized people with deep pockets to get a clone underway, and even then how do you persuade lots of happy users to switch from a solution that works very well for them to take a risk on another solution that's identical but doesn't have the size, scale and reputation of DRK?
The power of the network effect cannot be underestimated and once we are seen as the go to network for anonymous services such as web, email, money transfer, (add services heres...) then it will be very difficult to compete with us without innovating in some other way. Just copying us is very flattering but there's only one facebook, there's only one Ebay, there's only one twitter etc. Yes, they have competition, but the network effect ensures they have complete dominance of their respective markets. DRK would be no different in this instance...
Walter
Don't focus only on a closed apple like ecosystem. A paid tor network on the masternodes is imo a good idea, but don't close the door to other developments with "dark apps". There is bitxbay, a decentralized market already working with bitcoins, there is openbazaar coming. These markets are also important.
darkstrike420
Active member
All those who have problems with Bandwidth. I can recommend you http://ecatel.info They offer dedicated servers(yes dedicated, not VPS) starting at 30 EUR per month with standard package of 10 TB bandwidth per month. Their servers are located in the Netherlands and are Tor exit node friendly.
This DarkTor idea is pretty good, but a better idea is a decentralized marketplace.
This DarkTor idea is pretty good, but a better idea is a decentralized marketplace.
JGCMiner
Active member
I thought that was the point of integrating with OpenBaazar.
vertoe
Three of Nine
Please release darksend under GPLv3 license! What would be the point if you release Darksend under a non-copyleft license like MIT, Apache, etc, and allow any big bank or corporation to work your code into their proprietary products, and have more power? Defend software freedom! Free/Libre software defends freedom in society!
Last edited by a moderator:
crowning
Well-known member
I don't know if someone else mentioned this already, but the Tor people explicitly state here: https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en#combining
that they don't want "Tor" as part of a product-name.
vertoe
Three of Nine
I second that but it will be quite difficult, the original bit-, peer- and litecoin stuff is all licensed under MIT and you need to add a 2nd license to the project. might get messy.
http://stackoverflow.com/q/4035702/1260906
darklord1981
Member
The we can call it "DarkShield"
Discussion on bitcointalk about calling DarkTor " Web 3.0 "
Gets a +1 from me
I can't help but think on this constantly. And an idea kind of came to me. First I have to say my #1 concern is if Ethereum makes good on their plans. They have basically taken all the ideas we've put out there since March, and are building their platform to use those ideas. So how do we fortify our plans? I was wondering if maybe we could allow other nodes from other coins to plug into the system. Perhaps they could be relays and they could earn a small % of the income from the service, a split like we do with miners. That would make it so other people 1. can earn funds and 2. earn DRK funds. which would spread the use of DRK over any other coin and incentivize people to run a (regular) node.
I'm also thinking maybe our wallet could automatically hook into the p2pool network, so that a person could run their own miner, while being pooled with others, without the hassle of learning how to set p2pool up. That way, we'd have the strongest network ever, with the strongest p2pool network. I'd just want my home ip obfuscated. I would think that would be possible, no?
Etherium is already calling their's that
I don't see a problem with duel licensing. It seems that Darksend has been kept separate all this time anyway, why not?
hard_forker
Member
Is there any press release & contacting wired, coinbase etc. in plan before the news about DarkTor gets too old?
crowning
Well-known member
We use Darksend to send Darkcoins over the Darknet.
The name alone will drive the NSA crazy :tongue:
Isn't Ethereum created by the same guys who were previously involved in Mastercoin and MadeSafe scams? I have a feeling that, Ethereum folks have a habit of taking the money and not finishing the job or making your investment worthless.