[CLOSED] Masternode shares with automated payouts.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lebubar said:
Oooohhh ... You are full...
Can I ask why 45? And you mention that you'll do maybe more 45... why 45? Any reason?
So I'm happy I can increase my sharing? I was thimking of increasing it continusly with my earning of my other MN.
Click to expand...
I only prepared 45 wallets :)
Will prepare some new when I get time, but for now this is it.
 
Just wanted to mention... I signed up with vertoe's service a few days ago and received my first payment within a day. I was unsure about doing this, but I am glad I did. Yes, I don't know when vertoe sleeps. It seems she is online 24hrs. Highly recommend!
 
paperThin said:
Just wanted to mention... I signed up with vertoe's service a few days ago and received my first payment within a day. I was unsure about doing this, but I am glad I did. Yes, I don't know when vertoe sleeps. It seems she is online 24hrs. Highly recommend!
Click to expand...
I have kids, I don't sleep. :)
 
vertoe said:
All shares sold!

Existing investors can still increase their shares, but I'm not going to accept new investors at this point. All people who are engaged in PM with me count as existing investors.
Click to expand...

Why increase shares if masternodes remains 45? It' like you are acting as a bank and not as a service for the exceedings shares.
I propose to set a max of shares. I agree that some exceeding share is useful, because in the case some share holder go out you have to not shutdown any masternode. I dont know, maybe exceeding shares a 5% of total masternode-shares?

Just my 2 cents, I dont like the idea that many not-working shares decrease the payout of the single share.
 
elmad said:
Why increase shares if masternodes remains 45? It' like you are acting as a bank and not as a service for the exceedings shares.
I propose to set a max of shares. I agree that some exceeding share is useful, because in the case some share holder go out you have to not shutdown any masternode. I dont know, maybe exceeding shares a 5% of total masternode-shares?

Just my 2 cents, I dont like the idea that many not-working shares decrease the payout of the single share.
Click to expand...
And why not making more MN?
:grin:
Just my 2 duffs...
 
elmad said:
Just my 2 cents, I dont like the idea that many not-working shares decrease the payout of the single share.
Click to expand...
On the other hand, it is nice to know with Darkcoin, just by holding 1 DRK in a MN pool, it pays out. Darkcoin works for you.
Bitcoin is missing this point completely.
 
elmad said:
Why increase shares if masternodes remains 45? It' like you are acting as a bank and not as a service for the exceedings shares.
I propose to set a max of shares. I agree that some exceeding share is useful, because in the case some share holder go out you have to not shutdown any masternode. I dont know, maybe exceeding shares a 5% of total masternode-shares?

Just my 2 cents, I dont like the idea that many not-working shares decrease the payout of the single share.
Click to expand...
Hi elmad,
I stopped accepting new investors as I'm currently unable to set up more than 45 masternodes.
However, I allowed existing investors, to buy shares. This is because I will soon (tm; probably this week (tm)) migrate the masternodes to another hoster where I will be able to set up at least 100 nodes for the same price.
Please bear with me, I got plenty of stuff to do and I just need to get things sorted. :)

In the deep hope you will understand,
--vertoe
 
canibalbranco said:
This might seem to the event GHash.IO !? :what:
Click to expand...
There are currently 850 masternodes and I'm running 45. Thats hardly 5%. Hard to compare to GHash.io...
I will consider to increase the number of nodes but will never even scratch the 10%.

What are the numbers for GHash? 30%? 40%? 50%?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top