Dashmaximalist
Well-known member
i have written a article on it and we should advertise it by making a youtube video of it or something
check it out
why Bitcoin is broken ?
The reasons for its civil war and ways to fix this
If you are fan of bitcoin and keep following it you must have noticed that lately things have been not so great , yes we got 100% rise in the price in this year but thats the only good news , the community has been raging over how to tackle the scaling issue and looks like there is no real consensus on this.
Here are the reasons for this civil war
Bitcoin network is run by miners as you know and these are the people that get rewarded right now when process transactions ( and its a billion dollar industry right now), however there are also full nodes that are needed that keep track of every transaction that has ever happened on the network , so transactions are processed by miners but are recorded by full nodes , if we don't have enough full nodes , the transactions or truth about who owns what can be changed or hacked endangering the complete network as there is this fear of getting shutdown by governments or other actors if the count of nodes is too less.
Here’s where the problem arises , as you might have noticed the bitcoin transactions are currently slow and expensive lately the reason being the transaction limits are breached and 1 MB block size is getting full constantly. There were two proposed solutions increase the block size or introduce segwit which enables off-chain scaling, there are issues with both these problems.
The bitcoin core which is pro-segwit says that this block size should not be increased ase too much amount of data that will be stored will be too high and will economically difficult to maintain enabling even fewer nodes. The node count dropped from 100,000 to 6000 already, any further reduction places the entire network at risk.
The bitcoin unlimited proponents argue segwit doesn't resolve the problem right now ( as segwit will take 1–2 years for everyone to start using it) and also allege that many future use-cases like blockchain based notaries etc will be hampered if we just limit the blocksize limit at 1 MB and just focus on off-chain scaling ie segwit route.
As you can understand this is real issue and this debate has been raging for some time now.
Unfortunately there is no clean solution to this problem as bitcoin system does not incentivise the nodes. There needs to be a way to incentive nodes to keep more and more data and keep up with the speed requirements of the system.
Dash is a cryptocurrency that’s built on this core bitcoin platform but addresses these problems in a really interesting way.
In dash, these nodes are called masternodes and are paid equal amount to that of miners, however there is requirement to post collateral of 1000 dash.
This radical new way of incentivizing masternodes creates a whole new economic system which not only caters to long term growth of the system by incentivizing bigger and bigger blocks to carry more transactions it also means people effectively earn interest for holding 1000 dash on their master node.
Dash along with this comes up couple of genius features, about 10% of new coins created go to something called treasury that provides support for activities like development and marketing which is controlled by masternodes again through a voting mechanism, making dash - the first Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) in history.
The biggest drawback of bitcoin is, it gives enormous incentives to the miners ( the soldiers ) of the networks without giving anything to the nodes ( the investors / senators) of the network, this arguably is a fatal flaw in its design.
if you don't provide incentives ( in terms of interest and voting power) to the most important people in the network- the investors, the network will simply fail to grow.
The choice for bitcoin is simple , either adopt features like dash or be taken over by a better network.
https://medium.com/@krishnayogi/why-bitcoin-is-broken-1a6ac2f837cb
check it out
why Bitcoin is broken ?
The reasons for its civil war and ways to fix this
If you are fan of bitcoin and keep following it you must have noticed that lately things have been not so great , yes we got 100% rise in the price in this year but thats the only good news , the community has been raging over how to tackle the scaling issue and looks like there is no real consensus on this.
Here are the reasons for this civil war
Bitcoin network is run by miners as you know and these are the people that get rewarded right now when process transactions ( and its a billion dollar industry right now), however there are also full nodes that are needed that keep track of every transaction that has ever happened on the network , so transactions are processed by miners but are recorded by full nodes , if we don't have enough full nodes , the transactions or truth about who owns what can be changed or hacked endangering the complete network as there is this fear of getting shutdown by governments or other actors if the count of nodes is too less.
Here’s where the problem arises , as you might have noticed the bitcoin transactions are currently slow and expensive lately the reason being the transaction limits are breached and 1 MB block size is getting full constantly. There were two proposed solutions increase the block size or introduce segwit which enables off-chain scaling, there are issues with both these problems.
The bitcoin core which is pro-segwit says that this block size should not be increased ase too much amount of data that will be stored will be too high and will economically difficult to maintain enabling even fewer nodes. The node count dropped from 100,000 to 6000 already, any further reduction places the entire network at risk.
The bitcoin unlimited proponents argue segwit doesn't resolve the problem right now ( as segwit will take 1–2 years for everyone to start using it) and also allege that many future use-cases like blockchain based notaries etc will be hampered if we just limit the blocksize limit at 1 MB and just focus on off-chain scaling ie segwit route.
As you can understand this is real issue and this debate has been raging for some time now.
Unfortunately there is no clean solution to this problem as bitcoin system does not incentivise the nodes. There needs to be a way to incentive nodes to keep more and more data and keep up with the speed requirements of the system.
Dash is a cryptocurrency that’s built on this core bitcoin platform but addresses these problems in a really interesting way.
In dash, these nodes are called masternodes and are paid equal amount to that of miners, however there is requirement to post collateral of 1000 dash.
This radical new way of incentivizing masternodes creates a whole new economic system which not only caters to long term growth of the system by incentivizing bigger and bigger blocks to carry more transactions it also means people effectively earn interest for holding 1000 dash on their master node.
Dash along with this comes up couple of genius features, about 10% of new coins created go to something called treasury that provides support for activities like development and marketing which is controlled by masternodes again through a voting mechanism, making dash - the first Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) in history.
The biggest drawback of bitcoin is, it gives enormous incentives to the miners ( the soldiers ) of the networks without giving anything to the nodes ( the investors / senators) of the network, this arguably is a fatal flaw in its design.
if you don't provide incentives ( in terms of interest and voting power) to the most important people in the network- the investors, the network will simply fail to grow.
The choice for bitcoin is simple , either adopt features like dash or be taken over by a better network.
https://medium.com/@krishnayogi/why-bitcoin-is-broken-1a6ac2f837cb