yocko
Active member
We seem to be hitting a sticking point with legacy banking integrations due to our optional privacy feature.
People are talking about removing privacy and all sorts of drastic crazy measures to gain acceptance from exchanges and payment gateways.
Maybe we can approach this differently without losing our privacy option or the integrations. This is just thoughts, and I'm not looking for arguments or criticism, let's try and build a solution.
I propose we have core develop or we fund a proposal to establish an optional KYC/AML address section for the DASH Core wallet or a separate wallet. This would be a gateway wallet for users wanting to send money through the legacy banking system.
The legacy banking system will then know who the funds came from and can report as they are needed too.
Users who don't want to be linked don't use these wallets and the services that require them.
Ideas?
People are talking about removing privacy and all sorts of drastic crazy measures to gain acceptance from exchanges and payment gateways.
Maybe we can approach this differently without losing our privacy option or the integrations. This is just thoughts, and I'm not looking for arguments or criticism, let's try and build a solution.
I propose we have core develop or we fund a proposal to establish an optional KYC/AML address section for the DASH Core wallet or a separate wallet. This would be a gateway wallet for users wanting to send money through the legacy banking system.
The legacy banking system will then know who the funds came from and can report as they are needed too.
Users who don't want to be linked don't use these wallets and the services that require them.
Ideas?