thesavoyard
Active member
Outdated, this issue has been settled
Last edited:
Lets be honest General Bytes is busy with the crypto surge everyone has been having. But this might be a good time for @generalbytes to give us an update on the DASH as first class citizen project. The mix up in shipping is an unexpected human error and delay I know but at least GB is offering a refund. I hope they can straighten things out for you.
Obviously I don't know enough about this and it's not for me to tell you what to do.. but just my two cents worth, I would avoid the legal path and all the fighting, it's too expensive with personal unnecessary stress. You need to decide whether or not you want to stay with GB or not. If you want to stick with them, make your peace and accept their refunds etc. Otherwise, accept their refund and switch to someone else. Really, all those legal fees and stuff, way too unproductive. I realize you feel the need for class action etc, but keeping your principles can have a very high cost!
It appears the problem might be widespread. I'm reaching out to operators to find out how badly. It wasn't a simple mix up of shipping, these machines were never quality tested. I think you can go through my past posts when we discussed getting GB to add 2 way Dash function. I talked about our meeting in Amsterdam where Martijn called Dash a "shitcoin."
Please do expand on this, shouldn't we be about half way into the project for general bytes integrating DASH? are there some milestones setup? Who is Martijn and does he think all of the alt-bitcoins are shitcoins?
If dash is clearly in the right here, this would be great PR to sue and burn dash with the proceeds.
(If not,its terrible PR.)
General bytes is about to receive treasury funding to contract two devs to add dash functionality into their terminals, even though they have been demonstratively unreliable?
Why go with general bytes? Are they really the only counterparty possible?
This is pretty embarrassing if this proposal passes as-is.