Search results

dark-sailor Someone will be very happy, but it won't be me :wink: This not my address on testnet; I believe it belongs to UdjinM6.

I've sent an additional 200.00000002 tDRK... http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/40f65845af1cbdf9ebc74291a466e0175b19a0f3ad91266ff08774762527911a It neatly selected 2x 100.00000001 tDRK inputs, no change.

Sent 1234.56789 tDRK with DS+ inputs. Transaction ID: ad768063195d28ab5d1a0289551ec2a3ed81ffb7223c44a66bf00184adc73b78

It seems El Presidente has already given up on the task; this is a huge success!

Well it seems that Evan has outdone himself and has been able to keep us in the dark (pun intended)...

You can launch darkcoin-qt with the command line option "darksendrounds", e.g. ./darkcoin-qt -darksendrounds=8

vertoe I believe it is related to the following point:

There will probably still be a lot of collective excitement when 'enforcing' will be switched on on mainnet!

If anyone is up to the task, it would be chaeplin ! I'm too damn lazy to click on all these transactions and addresses :wink:

I believe it is currently maintained by AlexGR and elbereth but it is not editable by everyone.

flare If I understand the concept of spork correctly, at one point we will enforce masternode payments on mainnet without the need to update clients or modify critical mainnet parameters. Should this situation not be reproduced on testnet during RC4 testing? Is it part of the test plan?

eduffield I think it is important to clarify the situation about autodenomination fees by the time RC4 is released to mainnet. Ideally those fees should not exist for autodenomination but if it is unavoidable due to the size of involved transactions they need to be fully transparent and a...

http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/1f4d13f2dbaf738aedf0e4dd3e8fa2cc548503d7a33e18bb5364ed1ef258e2fc I'm selling some random pubic hairs found in my bathroom this morning for a discounted price of 99 tDRK at mtpnNrhhWoX9GNoMoSpV7TmDehstRqESDt

Hopefully your banana was able to rot a little further... I'd like to have a look. 45 tDRK sent to mmBeTmGt3otnw9PXcGGYUhGEitVRnTp4ra with DS+ inputs

New information about the potential CLOAK scam : http://www.reddit.com/user/doghousedetective/ Please be aware this is not a fact, it needs to be confirmed. EDIT: this could be correct but related to CloakSend 1.0, not 2.0

Those posts might have been reported by trolls to an admin...

'help' and 'darksend' indeed crash darkcoin-qt with 'Segmentation fault (core dumped)'

I have just sent you 123.456789 DRK with DS+ inputs. Transaction ID: bfa22b1e000003440ee61a2abc90f447ea19a027178cee360af1f596448c603f Edit: here is the link on the blockchain explorer http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/bfa22b1e000003440ee61a2abc90f447ea19a027178cee360af1f596448c603f

Small question about the masternode voting consensus: it seems that even with the latest updates to RC4, there still are diverging payees on certain blocks as can be seen on the screenshot below. Is this a normal behavior or something that still needs to be fixed in an upcoming update?

I just sent you 69 tDRK with DS+ inputs; feel free to send some back to n4mJmycicjbcRbETpiSdGXCBzjDEMNzsHU