Search results

No response from anyone here in the forums, but for completeness: It all eventually cleared out. But it had been doing this for quite some time. For how long? I don't know. But what I did was delete all the .dat files shut down for a bit, and then cranked everything back up. The FAILED messages...

I did the same thing with the 0.15 MN and the issue did not go away with it. I continue to troubleshoot. . . . 2020-02-21 04:08:49 ProcessMessages(version, 138 bytes) FAILED peer=7046 2020-02-21 04:08:49 ThreadSocketHandler -- removing node: peer=7046 nRefCount=2 fInbound=0 fMasternode=1...

Okay. After 2900+ repetitions (the 0.14 MN still), it stopped logging the failure. I don't understand what just happened. First failure was: 2020-02-20 22:49:19 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000005be39b2e4fe54b9a8f895c321916f69b51aba1acc6c308de6 height=1224859 version=0x20000000...

I'm in the process of upgrading production masternodes to 0.15. I see this in a 0.14 MN. (Note that the IP address here is not the IP address of my MN). I upgraded one MN to 0.15 and it is seeing similar messages but without the explicit addr=<IP>. I thought it would clear out eventually, but...

Well, the packaging is in tarball form. ;) Reminds me of Slackware from back in the day. If you want to use the exact tarball requested by the system, it is this: https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/libbacktrace/archive/rust-snapshot-2018-05-22/libbacktrace-rust-snapshot-2018-05-22.tar.gz with...

@netkeeper I had the same issue. Now, I can't recall the precise set of circumstances that led to it, but ... it is probably associated to either (a) you aren't allowing the depends build system to download and build the libbacktrace tarball, or (b) that does happen, but your build is forgetting...

RPMs for Fedora (and RHEL/CentOS in the test repo) built, tested, and now in deployment. https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm

RPMs built for Fedora 29 and 30 and running on my MNs... So... Available for update if you have been using these in the past... https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm UPDATE: I appreciate the thumbsup and such from a few folks. But I posted an incorrect link that lead to a entire different...

The format for the `masternode list full` and `info` commands has changed. Was this intentional? And looking at the help text there seems to be a bunch of changes to the list command. Is there documentation somewhere related to this? Or should I file a bug? Options and formats for 0.14... $...

RPMs built in the test repo as of a few hours ago... For more information, see: https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm

For folks that platform on Red Hat/Fedora based distributions... 0.13.0 has been long in testing and was rolled into the stable repositories quite promptly after the release (though delayed for a few hours due to a packaging hiccup). Unfortunately my documentation lagged by a day. But they have...

Thank you for this. Honesty in the crypto-space is a refreshing change versus the more defensive posture other projects seem to embrace. This is definitely a concern in principle, but certainly not a panic issue for all the reasons you mentioned (a more default instantsend and, in the near...

Access to Fedora packages can be found here: https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm man dashd gives me... DASHD(1) User Commands DASHD(1) NAME dashd - manual page for...

Note: If you are running a masternode using my RPM builds - https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm - you just have to log into your masternode server, `sudo dnf upgrade dashcore-sentinel -y` and ... you're done. Tested with dash core 0.12.3 (current mainnet) and 0.13.0 (testnet). No reboots or...

What will the next version of Sentinel be? 1.3.0? I need to know for my test builds.

Philosophical comments and why I built the Fedora/RHEL/CentOS packages the way I did (from which @xkcd developed some of this configuration)... If you are running a masternode, robustness and repeatability matters -- you need to run it like a sysadmin even if you are not a sysadmin...

Sorry. Fixed in the original posting. https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm/tree/master/documentation And yes... Dash Masternode Tool works with it (and I build an RPM version of that as well, but you can use any build you want). I use a Trezor and the dash-masternode-tool myself.

Are you running DashCore on Fedora, CentOS or RHEL using my RPMs? If so, everything has been updated for the new release at https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm Please note the upgrade instructions found here: https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm/tree/master/documentation Read: "Upgrading...

Please. Pretty please. Tag dashpay/sentinel 1.2.0 in concert? Not having that official tag adds ambiguity to my Fedora builds. Thanks. :) Flare? Nathan?

For Fedora/CentOS/RHEL folks that are comfortable with systemd (managing a node like a sys-admin)... my builds of 12.3 are updated and available in the test repos. Starting point: https://github.com/taw00/dashcore-rpm and then read the README.binaries.md document, which will then lead you to the...