Search results

Funny how this is all coming out only now. Never during the 7 year long journey of Platform development, has the MNO network been asked or polled on directions by the devs, after explaining the various tradeoffs. If its true that Platform will not waste resources (i really doubt it), it could...

What makes no sense is to increase collateral for aiming at relatively few Platform Nodes, when the criteria should rather be based on Hardware resources, like bandwidth score, ping latency score, available space etc. They want platform to be fast-as-hell, but have obviously totally forgot how...

Nobody who is lacking the technical expertise can do what you propose. And that´s probably everybody except a few Core/Platform developers. You know that something like that could even cause one (or more) Forks of the project, which could seriously damage the projects market-cap. We have the...

An Arizona judge will eventually explain you the fallacy of your assumptions before sentencing you to damages. What you mention would only have merit if you would release software for all the different variants/solutions, only then MNOs would have a real choice. Staying on outdated versions may...

@QuantumExplorer You already made your intent clear by now, DCG feels no longer any need to honor the wishes of the MNO network and to respect whether a Governance Proposal (10% Supermajority) is passing or not passing. I hope you understand what you are causing, because if you don't respect...

Introducing a second type of Masternodes (what comes next, perhaps a third type?) is nothing but amateur fuckery. Given how complicated such a system is by design (regular Core Reward Subsidies to Evo Pool) to make higher-collateral Nodes economically competitive, try to explain this system to...

I guess the problem of such a 0.25K solution would be, that there would be ~ 4000 Platform Nodes (much more than they obviously are aiming at), while at the same time a completely missing group of 0.25K masternodes (at least at the time of introducing this), but that could grow over time easily...

Am i correct in my assumption, that the 4K and 10K solution intends to re-allocate a portion of Core Rewards to an EVO Pool, from which the Platform Rewards would be paid to the Platform Nodes? I understand that in such a scenario the frequency of payments in the Core Network will increase...

Are you talking about allocating a portion of Core Rewards to an Evo Pool? Halving the profitability of thousands of masternodes, in order to boost the earnings of a few hundred Platform nodes, which are mostly owned by few whales? And you feel no shame proposing this as a noble idea? Give me a...

Dream all you want about your 4K and 10K "solutions", Trustless Shares, 0.25K masternodes and whatnot, but you will be unable to obtain a passing Governance Proposal for any of this. And i am sure you won´t realize how lucky you are if none of this passes, because that´s the best outcome you...

Simple answer: it doesn't Its a lie. What it does is the exact opposite, a much higher collateral will favor only the few large stakeholders. Nobody else can participate (unless Trustless Shares are introduced). Now they talk about Trustless Shares being a solution for a problem which is both...

They may not be able to sustain such a Fixed Exchange Rate, if massive amounts of Platform Credits are created, which Platform Node Operators will regularly try to convert to Core Dash coins. They will eventually run out of Core Dash coins to convert all those Platform Credits to. Unless it will...

Herewith i challenge QE and Virgile to prove my math is wrong. Presumed that 1 Duff = 1,000 Credits as Qwizzie mentioned. This translates to 100 billion Platform Credits = 1 Dash Now, if we know that a 4K HPMN would need to earn about 4.20 Dash (3 x MN Block Reward of approximately 1.40 Dash)...

I cannot believe all this. If what you say is true, somebody or a group of people greatly overstepped what they are allowed to do. Perhaps you do not realize what you claim is happening, but if an Exchange Rate with Dash is Fixed/Pegged (or even if they introduce fake volatility to dilute the...

Converted by a Floating Exchange Rate from a publicly traded market where price discovery happens ?? If such Credits are planned to have a Fixed/Pegged Exchange Rate with Dash, they are creating additional Dash outside of our Core Payment Network. Something that would at the very least require...

If its not DASH what is created there, the question will be what is it worth ?? Especially if there is no market trading it, and no price discovery mechanism in place. Fixing an exchange rate with DASH would basically be the same as creating real Dash. If there is an exchange rate pegged to Dash...

Sorry, i am too stupid to understand it. Maybe in one of the buckets is no water, but something else. Regarding the 4K solution: You confirmed a HPMN will earn just the same as a regular 1K node from Core (Payment Network). With 4K HPMN this means, such a HPMN would have to earn in about 7-8...

Just saying, if not all of those HPMN will always get at the very least 90% of the Rewards they had gotten running 4 or 10 regular 1K masternodes, then you would see them flee en masse, word would spread and nobody would convert to HPMN, it wouldn't be economically viable if it pays considerably...

Very few MultiMNO could be willing to convert 4 or 10 regular nodes and turn them into a HPMN, unless you are able to guarantee the same (or higher) compensation, if they decide to run Platform and convert to HPMN. Can you guarantee Platform rewards? Because Core rewards are (almost) guaranteed...

Anybody voting on the 4K or 10K "solutions" will ultimately vote for more centralization and creating an elitist cartel running Platform exclusively. Correct me if i'm wrong, but the way they have planned this, those 4K or 10K nodes could use the lamest bandwidth connections and/or high-latency...