Search results

The only thing that the AI actually did get right is the potential for DoS attacks against Tenderdash which are also a problem in Tendermint and most cryptocurrencies and something that is actively trying to be mitigated.

Sometimes the problem with AI is that when you ask it to find something wrong it will hallucinate an answer that really sounds like it is correct, but just is meaningless. For example you wrote that the AI said: A possible double-spending attack on the Dash Platform, by exploiting the...

Once again, DCG doesn't have the power to enact a change on the network. We can only supply software. It's up to masternode owners to run or not run that software.

It's not about compromise, I am giving the numbers, are you okay with a 4.2% return? If so then make a proposal for that solution and vote on it. Maybe DCG itself will make the proposal because it does technically work. I will have to think about that and confer with other board members.

I am more advocating for any solution that works. As for the threshold, I am also just explaining what we currently have for consensus. In the end DCG will have to chose a solution to code based on the most voted solution, and the network will either chose to activate it or not. And right now...

The 2MB block size increase was not contentious. And there was also a binary choice. We sadly have a multiple choice question that is highly contentious. As soon as platform goes live we can have contracts for voting, and we can perform these types of votes with ease, until then we can either...

Okay, let's talk about the 1k Opt in Solution, what % will the top whale control of the network? In the 10k opt in solution what % will the top whale control of the network? It's exactly the same. So why so I say the system is more secure with 10k? With higher collateral there are less HPMNs...

@vazaki3 To be clear what 1k solution are you referring to?

My definition around decentralization is on how many individual bad actors does it take to take the system down. This is the point of decentralization: to have a robust system that can not be easily taken down. You are talking about ease of access to being able to run Platform. I do get why you...

In the part about stakeholders. Top whale has 270k Dash, next whale has 220 Dash, etc. This is taken into account.

@qwizzie This is factually wrong. We are not actually changing anything. Look at the code, see how it is written. We are going by how the code is written. If you want to change it you need to propose a proposal that can gather enough support. I believe right now we have one of the most...

You are jumping to conclusions. 100 yes votes would not be enough. That is not our consensus mechanism. You need more than 60% of EVERY masternode, not just 100 nodes. This means of the 3900 or so nodes you would need about 2340. For protocol decisions the network votes, just not through the...

It will be impossible to find a solution that will please everyone. The goal is network consensus. Saying "the same conditions apply" is disregarding the original statement I made. It doesn't matter that there was once a proposal that DCG made like that. That's not our consensus mechanism for...

@qwizzie Now I get the confusion. This was not a protocol consensus decision. DCG leadership at the time had decided to use that threshold the following way: "Regardless of degree, the option with the most net (yes minus no) votes will proceed to the next phase (next month). DCG will implement...

I am sorry that many here do not understand the difference between network consensus and funding consensus. Network consensus is anything 2/3rd (or so) believe it to be. That's that. At the beginning of Dash we used the BIP9 consensus mechanisms, now we use the...

@qwizzie You said on Dashcentral that you would stop voting on DCG proposals. But what exactly would you have DCG do in the following situation. The network has made it abundantly clear that they want Platform to activate by funding DCG for the last few years. But what happens if no +10%...

If we were to put all solutions at the same level at 100$/HPMN/Month we would get this instead: All nodes Masternode Hosting cost $ 100 Dollars Masternode Hosting cost Dash 2.5 Dash Cost to network 115800 Dash Yield 4.25% /year 1K Split Masternode count 2,060 MNs...

I ran the numbers for you. Yes the system does indeed work. For my numbers I chose 250 Dash for a MN and 1000 Dash for a HPMN. In terms of calculated safety the numbers are very close to the HPMN 4K solution. The problem really becomes the effective return rate: All nodes Masternode Hosting...

When you allow people choice you can never know things for sure, which is why I have given estimates based on market theory. This theory is the basis of capitalism. So what is the way to be sure of the values? Take people's choice away from them? No, I can't be sure. But I would gladly always...

We have provided the math and the spreadsheets. Calling it a lie without disproving the math or explaining why it is a lie makes me think that you are just imagining it to be a lie because you don't like the solution.