Search results

I agree with your point. The technology behind the project is unique and revolutionary. Imagine now if this technology links with ordinary and confusing brand like DASH ? How many years will take to the marketing team to explain to the dumb people the meaning of this widely used "brand" ? Take...

I have the same issue. Started my wallets before more that 2 hours and they didn't progress until then (stuck at 0% after the first denom).

In this case it may be normal if not deleted the whole dir that contains the blocks :smile:. I only deleted the old wallets and peers and fully reindexed both clients.

I'm seeing a lot orphan block msg in the debug.log. Is it normal or testnet forking ?

Awesome work, devs! Fired up two clients to mix some nuts :smile: ..

I already saw the moon and despair and this didn't reflect on my decisions about the project cos I had the opportunity to recognize Evan's work in very early stage and had all the time to understand the fundamentals clearly. So your concerns about my vision for the project are completely wrong...

Did you try to synchronize from the scratch with --reindex ?

Do you prefer our competitors and their puppets to have ammo ? If you visit BCT now you will see some retarded bagholders of other coins who staying in our thread to pay attention on them and eventually someone to recognize their dying projects. Imagine the times when DRK had forks and the...

I did a reindex+zapwallettxes, del peers.dat and after six confirmations I felt like didn't do the things right till now(IX+DS, 1000 tDRKs IX only looked fine), but when I tried to send from the receiving address got "Insufficient funds" msg. Transactions were already confirmed 7 times. I...

Regardless of this, coins appeared almost instantly on the balance. The problem is on the verification side.

Sent some DS+IX, but got the error mentioned above. Sender: Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 15 node(s) Date: 10.2.2015 г. 00:06 To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx Debit: -10.00 tDRK Transaction fee: -0.100101 tDRK Net amount: -10.100101 tDRK...

Sender: Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 11 node(s) Date: 9.2.2015 г. 23:54 To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx Debit: -1000.00 tDRK Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK Net amount: -1000.01 tDRK Transaction ID...

IX working fine for me with small sums. Tried to send 1000 tDRKs, but IX verification failed and I got them in the normal way. Also put some for mixing (50/4R) and got 52.14 as final DS balance At the end tried to send some darksend coins through IX, but failed and got them as normal tx.

Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 24 node(s) Date: 8.2.2015 г. 21:47 To: test1 y8TfKjwyk9F4XfHFR8DuHSQn8PQnjvqfUm Debit: -1.00 tDRK Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK Net amount: -1.01 tDRK Transaction ID: 0f308bee05f641aa568505b5ce97beca7048840f61d270f791cd2e501fbffabb-000

Send some here :) . y8TfKjwyk9F4XfHFR8DuHSQn8PQnjvqfUm yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx Thanks!

I tried to make an IX tx with the latest wallet, but without success. It confirms as normal tx at the end.

Both wallets failed to receive an IX txs /11.1.13/

Very likely. Maybe I'm not so familiar about the current limitations that Evan decided to put. Sorry if I made some guesses that are not in place.

Looks like that's the case :smile:.

Received both transactions of 1000 tDRKs after few minutes, but they didn't processed via IX.