Search results

love you for being able to look into that. i'm currently into exams and cant even look into testnet---

In addition to Ignition75's visualization, I'd like to add Darkcoin is trustless. Everyone using darkcoin agrees in a consensus that the software algorithms using strong predefined cryptography to create and verify transactions are valid, which includes the denomination of coins (mixing)...

it's so damn hot, it will probably replace Qt one day :D

Do you want a web frontend for darkcoin daemon?

Hi akhavr it's not my pull request, I subscribed your repository and got 1 mail for each of your comments on that pull request, that's why I got nosy and started looking over it too and adding some comments. I suggest you to reject that pull request and start fixing things step by step. If you...

Onyx V4 is semantically wrong, as it's something really new. Iris V1 would be logically correct. That said, I prefer Core :-)

By the way did you notice new generated blocks confirm after 101 blocks?

I vote "Darkcoin Core", or "0.11".

there is technically no interesting difference between 64 and 32 bit, the code base is the same. and no, we didnt test these binaries for ages, we just started 2 days ago. please take some time and read the release notes, this client is a complete different code base and a lot of stuff can go...

Sorry for all the confusion, I never wanted to tell "you" (qwizzie) what to do, but "you" (guys out there testing stuff)... sorry for quoting you all along, initially I must have misclicked your post, because it's obviously not related.

I warned you to run any version of the client only on testnet and with extreme caution.

Go to Settings > Options > Main and set the number of script threads to a negative value and tell me if this fixes the unresponsible wallet behaviour. If it does not, we have to make evan to enforce stricter threading rules on darksend-blockchain-scanning. eduffield maybe have a look at this...

Yes balances display weird numbers. This is pending some investigations :)

yes just noticed after update that the settings were gone, some missing bit was fixed in this release. @everyone check out this nice feature: leads you directly to: http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/342253430186dea0f209dc6bfe772193318778677f6f135b219971958f818da3

flare I was reported that the build of elbereth is using .darkcoin appdata folder where as your builds try to use .bitcoin appdata, I cant see any differences in code, could you double check the references in gitian are all correct? just an idea. (see posts above)

This looks related: Light can you try using the latest 0.11.0.3 build by elbereth and report back if this still occurs? Thanks /Edit, stupid me, its a windows build. just wait for new mac builds :)

it's a bug obviously. just checked my own found block: http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/585f7e577b0ecbcd9c03b9f21cfc4126c41bffd42ae547de509e00c4771ae95e the block reward is 23, 9 drk for miner and 14 for masternode. but the masternode payment is totally missing, this has to be fixed first...

to be honest, v10 and v11 should be compatible. take your time. the issue with the seed is that seednodes seem not to be queried if there is a peers.dat available (but most peers in there are totally outdated.) take your time ;-)

darksent http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/9ffacf55ab68a9eecf432d51fe7e16952cb1fad0f237ac6657f54889a37a673b

Well, the message is pretty straight forward, isnt it? https://github.com/vertoe/darkcoind-ncurses/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/vertoe/darkcoin_subsidy ;-)