Search results

This discussion is becoming pointless exchange of posts produced by ego-maniacs. Let's be productive.

You are mixing many things and understand it as a roadmap. Roadmap is not a technical design document like (from your example) dimension of the screws. Roadmap is not a vulnerability report, with a description of vulnerabilities or problems. Roadmap is a visual representation of the strategy...

@virgile Why in a world would anyone need NDA to disclose any roadmap? Roadmap is not a legally binding document in any way, and disclosing it could not do any harm to anyone. This isn’t a contract, there is no financial, personal nor any other type of confidential data involved In technical...

@QuantumExplorer Many thanks for explaining the new concept during the interview with Joel. That was good and informative conversation. Good luck!

Yes, that + stop being obsessed about developing another technical feature that no one cares about. FIrst of all you need to understand why Dash is being removed/delisted. From my experience there are two major factors driving this: 1. Regulations - and tbh we can do sh** about it - regulators...

The situation you are in is not a coincidence and did not happen over the weekend. We were having conversations like this when I was still in the company. You have chosen to listen only to yourself and to not accept any feedback other than enthusiastic. Here you have multiple voices expressing...

@QuantumExplorer I wouldn’t be so sure about the fame and glory - not in this situation. I hope you don’t work for fame and glory anyway (because most likely you won’t experience any in this industry). I don’t suggest you have any incentive to delay the release. I rather think you fear...

Sam, this is ridiculous way of thinking in the software industry. You can imagine probably 10 more scenarios when something could go wrong. This is normal and shouldn’t stop any company from building and releasing products. Risks are always in place and they should be simply assessed and...

Why this discussion even takes place? There is no reason to discuss this HIGHLY theoretical matter. There is no platform in place. There is no dapps in place. There is no confirmed problems with the platform performance. There is no data in place, confirming necessity to implement different...

My perspective after 90+ days. I might be wrong or don't be aware of some outcomes. 1. Is the delivery schedule for Platform clarified? -> No a. Are all complexities, dependencies, gaps, etc. well documented? -> No b. Is an updated delivery schedule, taking into account 1.a above...

I completely agree. This discussion and presentations are only waste of time and resources. Stop looking for another geeky thing to do. Just release the platform!

Oh... we have two more "honest investigators", as I can see. Did you notice how "significant" run rate reductions DCG experienced after Ryan's departure or after my resignation? To be honest, I couldn't care less about your insinuations and "conclusions". This type of primitive manipulation...

@AgnewPickenag Please remove all the mess about salary disclosure from this thread. Thanks

Are you a child without ability to read and understand? Let me help you: Salary range disclosure in job posting example: Senior Java Developer role earns between $50k and $100k annually. Salary disclosure example: John Smith earns $75k annually. ‍♂️

No, it is not. Just ask Google about the difference. I am not going to fight with your ignorance and mental troubles. If you still want to demand salaries being disclosed, ask DCG individual contributors to disclose them. This time it is definitely eot.

This is becoming embarrassing. Did you even read the article you have linked? This is not about salary disclosure - this is about pay scale disclosure in job posting. Salary of specific individuals remains confidential under California law and any other western law system. Educate yourself...

No, I don't think the project is doomed. I think there is a clear vision but poorly executed. As I wrote previously - DCG should do whatever necessary to finish the platform MVP development, release it and make sure it works on the mainnet. After that part of the funds should be redirected...

I think this question and change should be parked in backlog for later consideration. In my opinion this is absolutely unnecessary and it would only delay the release due to additional complexity of the network architecture and additional code needed to be developed, tested and maintained. Let's...

There was a discussion about this basically on monthly basis, during the board meetings. And it was always the same story shared with the board - we are doing better and need 3-6 months. When we have realized that was a mistake, things went too far, price felt down, we went into survival mode...

Well... I would not say we abandoned the ship - I was on the ship during much worse times and tried hard to work things out. Things went sideways due to a few very unacceptable incidents triggered by some particular individuals and it did not seem to me that Trust Protectors were interested in...