Search results

Yeah, I saw your previous post asking about the syntax. I'm hoping we get an example soon. I usually spin up between 50 and 100 testnet nodes when we have a testing cycle. I shut them down after we release, so these will be online for the duration.

I hope you mean 69, hehe. Yes, I've seen the mnfinalbudget suggest help. It's not much help. I tried: ubuntu@node-01:~/testnet$ ./dash-cli -datadir=. mnfinalbudget suggest proposal-moo-2 https://www.masternode.me/proposals/moo-2.json 100 70000 y4uESG43teypVWPx2dwREundfMy8S62MEW 1000 and a few...

Have gotten a test proposal successfully broadcast and voted on. Ran this on hot-node number one. ./dash-cli -datadir=. mnbudget vote proposal-moo-2 https://www.masternode.me/proposals/moo-2.json 100 70000 y4uESG43teypVWPx2dwREundfMy8S62MEW 1000 yes Then waited a minute and ran the same...

Personally, I'd like to see us adopt something both human readable and machine parsable. YAML for instance. a non-related example of some yaml: --- !clarkevans.com/^invoice invoice: 34843 date : 2001-01-23 bill-to: &id001 given : Chris family : Dumars address: lines: |...

When soloing on testnet I would underclock to just a few hundred kh/s. Just to let the cpu miners keep some of the coin. Unfortunately, v12 doesn't play well with my sgminer. I can't solo-mine like I could on previous versions for some reason. (I verified the new rpcallow syntax was correct...

Just a reminder. Keep the hashes low! -- On a different note, my win-qt got stuck on some block overnight. Attempting repair wallet -> rebuild index caused a crash. Restarting the client got it synced again. -- Am starting up 70 tmns now. Hopefully they'll get synced similarly. (they...

Now that v12 testing started (it's paused for the moment, btw), I rebuilt the DIY masternode profit calc spreadsheet against the v12 code. Minimum rewards are as good as they ever will be. That first 2.5% block decrease will occur as soon as the v12 spork is enabled. Enjoy...

You're welcome, CyberNerd! Welcome to the forum, and thanks for choosing masternode.me! :)

you have to unlock your wallet first walletpassphrase <yourpasswordhere> 120 importprivkey <yourwif> <a_label> where a_label is a label you want to attach to the address. e.g. "paper_wallet_Xblahbla" your wif will start with a X -- here's a random one as an example...

how to build a secure paper wallet: goto https://walletgenerator.net/ save page as -> to a usb key on a secure laptop with networking turned off (or even better, a linux live cd) generate and print your wallets. to protect from flood/monsoon/zombies, print two copies (ignore the webpage...

first, you need a 'start-many' config that uses the 'masternode.conf' file then, to the end of your masternode.conf line (right after the output index integer) add: destinationaddress:percentage e.g. <alias> <mnaddr> <mnprivkey> <txid> <vout> Xblahblahblahblah:10 to send, on average, one out...

darkred You're very welcome! Thank you for choosing my service! :)

Am so glad to hear you can reproduce. I checked his hdd and ram, all fine. network was a bit bursty, but everything seems fine with his os. dashd would just freeze up like .16 was doing. (verified he's running .17) It hung up with a complete blockchain too. I rsync'd in a good offline copy...

d'aww, thanks tungfa, splawik21 I appreciate it! :) Version 2 of the site is in the works between diaper changes, hehe. Expect good things in a bit here.

read my edit. :)

just keep in mind it may be more like: From: yGicnVeYWqR77eJUiGwYYMfdcDrj3Qs1Ew (and 79 other addresses) expect many many-to-one transactions -- customer identity should be determined by the receiving address, not the sending. -- Your system needs to reserve and store each generated address...

all the info I suggest is in that code snippet. literally "(and 9 other addresses)" And it is useful to have an address you *know* they have control of to send, say, a refund back to.

999 tdrk went swimmingly: Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 29 node(s) Date: 4/8/2015 01:08 To: xwPji1MQbirZNFevfnZtX1wCeSETWb2c57 Debit: -999.00 tDASH Transaction fee: -0.01 tDASH Net amount: -999.01 tDASH Transaction ID...

exact same here, good catch! Yes. something is overlapping.

Another thing, can we show one of the sending addresses instead of 'unknown' Perhaps: From: yGicnVeYWqR77eJUiGwYYMfdcDrj3Qs1Ew (and 9 other addresses) edit: lol bigrcanada -- we thought the same thing at the same time. -- I usually wait for a block and check http://test.explorer.dashninja.pl/