Search results

Problems with this solution: - If 50%+1 of the network disagrees on a project it won't ever happen. If 50%+1 of the network cooperates, fund will never be released. --> If a group takes control of 50%+1 it can block any such payouts, or make voting obsolete - If there's a small project that...

Or preferably think a bit about the possible alternatives, and implement a good system in the first place. Speaking for myself I really hope a modified version of the idea will get implemented. While I agree with most of it, there are some details that could be tweaked, resulting in a system...

Hi, What to do when a masternode gets stuck on an earlier version on dashninja, and gets unlisted sooner or later - while the reality is that it's running the most recent dash version: 2.22? This is after various reboots/restarts. Let me know please how to deal with this issue. getinfo shows...

Thanks for the clarification. While at first glance I'd oppose such a solution, I know (or hope) nothing is decided for good yet, so I'd gladly participate in the debate about this later.

One thing was not clear to me. Let's say there are 5 projects that can be funded. Funding is done by masternodes voting every cycle. I am interested in funding project A, but only 20 more masternodes are interested in funding project A. The vast majority is interested in funding project B...

And what about the end result being a completely centralized corporation? Yeah, would be awesome.

As far as I know it was postponed as work on mobile wallets capable of ds and ix are treated with priority.

Hoping for a fix, couldn't get my mns working with the new release. They were rock stable with the previous version (1.25)

+1 If the color is not fixed yet, make sure to choose wisely now. And do this soon, as more and more places are going to use the new logo.

So the basic color has changed from darkcoin's blue? In that case dashtalk.org's logo should be updated as well. I though the original blue stays.

The thing is, we mustn't force MN owners to pay a tax. Imagine the rage in the community (especially from competing currencies' fans). Having an optional donation is however an awesome idea.

Guys, please don't use non-approved logos on events about darkcoin. The logo will be decided soon, and we will be able to use that everywhere. No reason to cause further confusion

You're correct, updating the page is not urgent. What is way more important is knowing who is still behind the project. That should be clarified. And I really really hope that we only lost vertoe, and you moli along with the other devs are still dedicated to drk/dash.

Just told my gf about the rebranding, and asked her about the new name. She said that the first time I'd told her I was buying Darkcoin she'd had questions in her mind about the legality of that investment. She expected it to be something shady. She's neutral towards dash though - but that's...

What about the legal stuff? Could we obtain the trademark for dash? I hope so - without that this statement would be a bit premature.

If we ever gonna change the name, do it now. And stick with the name for good. The smaller Darkcoin's brand recognition is, the easier we can change name. There is no point building up a brand just to drop it in a year.

Quoted for truth! Development needs to continue. Also, in case vertoe is gone, we need to know who is going to take over the internalization project. (or any other projects vertoe was heavily involved in)

Don't worry, it was communicated explicitly that "coin" won't be included in the new name, no matter what it will be.

I'm for either Dash, or sticking with Darkcoin. Oh, and a decision soon :D

Tao was acting unprofessionally imho as well. But with good intentions. Someone in this thread highlighted the mistakes, and I hope he will take this information into consideration. To hype something is one thing. To lie, or spread half-truths is something completely different. Drk on btc-e and...