Search results

This code inherited from BTC might need looked at in net.cpp: addrConnect = CService("74.208.43.192", 80); // www.showmyip.com See here and here for details. TL;DR - apparently joining clients are trying to swap info about their IPs with some random estate agents. [Edit: Separate post for...

For posts with many pages, it would be better if the page numbers at the bottom were more distinct (current page vs the rest).

:eek: That's what I'm afraid of. But no-one else wants to talk about it here so I won't press it further. Hopefully their confidence is justified in this case and Murphy’s Law, Cromwell's Law, Hofstadter's Law, and Santayana's Law of Repetitive Consequences are not. :oops:

This is an awesome team. Kudos to all testers and devs for the great progress. This is true innovation and it's amazing to watch the future being built before my eyes. Having said that, given the history, please indulge me in a thought experiment: You wake up after RC4's release to a frantic...

I agree wholeheartedly with the general sentiment, but for trailblazing software of this complexity, waiting till at least 30 days have passed on testnet without even a minor bug isn't realistic if we want RC4 released this year. There is ALWAYS one more bug.

https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/487311897864450048 Andreas only has one true love. He's unlikely come to the DRK side till the technology has proved itself.

#1 looks great. I would have said #3, but I think the text might be a little harder to read.

Will another attempt to mix them be made automatically, or must the user do it manually? Must every client wait for every other client whose coins their coins are being mixed with? How many clients is that on a typical 8-masternode transaction? Thanks.

Personally I love it, but if it's intended for a broad audience, the key screens that an entry-level user will need to use should be as simple as possible. We also need to get the opinions of the less technical, not-particularly-darkcoiny end of the intended audience. We might be surprised...

Even if you're only rejecting 25%, that's still blocks that one part of the network will consider valid, and another part won't. We'd have forks sprouting again.

Terzo is not a reliable source.

Wow. Well done, that's awesome. :cool:

Please report back when you have an idea what might be happening. Posts like "Basically due to this new update I got fucked out of 9700 dollars." seem to have caused a great deal of alarm, and if it turns out that what happened isn't the fault of the update at all it would be nice to undo as...

What? I was just showing that he didn't just appear out of nowhere and has in fact supported DRK in the past. I'm trying to stop the witchhunt so we can concentrate on figuring out if this might be a real problem or just his system playing up.

http://www.reddit.com/user/blackempress

All.

What happened on testnet at 4pm GMT? Did it have the same problems? If so, then we know what has to be done before the next fork attempt.

4pm GMT (1hr 40mins from now)

Evan has also pushed out an alert to all older versions telling them to update.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ProcessMessage+FAILED&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=FQWhU_W7EeXR8gfzyIDABQ#channel=sb&filter=0&q=%22ProcessMessage%28dsee%2C%22+%22bytes%29+FAILED%22&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&safe=off Hope...