Search results

Nice ! Ok maybe it's crazy but @LimLims why not use all those color variations like @NameUser proposed or at least some of them. I can imagine t-shirts with those different logos. The D is recognizable enough.

@NameUser I know that @LimLims already said this on bitcointalk, but I was summarizing for @godzirra my previous arguments, he didn't understand.

My point is that's irrelevant, so why not keep the original design as the guy made/conceived it, moreover, if the argument is to change the colors just to change the perception about the coin it's useless. We are wasting time on something irrelevant : without a definite logo the marketing is on...

If you fail to see the reasoning then read again. ;)

@raze I have nothing against "Prestige, value, timelessness and sophistication" (black) or "Pure, noble clean and soft" (white) (see https://www.blackcard.com). And most of those studies about colors are BS, at the end of the day only a nice packaging (whatever the color) and the quality of the...

You can't change that with a logo. Put flowers, colorful fonts the coin is still named Darkcoin, we have to highlight the value added by the coin and embrace the name there is no stigma. "Darkcoin ? ohhh the coin with a colorful logo and spring flowers, they kind of don't assume the name (You...

There are some famous black and white logos, somebody did post an example on bitcointalk during the first "debate", even if, it's the occasion to be unique and highly recognizable. Moreover, I think that b&w suits better the Darkcoin than (e.g.) the color blue which seems off topic ... :confused:

There is no hurdle. The name is what it is, make the letters more colorful will change nothing. All those things are meaningless. Promoting the privacy, the anonymity etc. is the key of success.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/13368/whats-the-difference-between-bitcoind-and-bitcoin-qt-different-commands

Yeah but that one might be even better as a DarkSend logo.