Search results

  1. D

    Decentralized mixing

    Here is how I would use DarkSend+ under the following circumstances: - When anonymizing your coins, you have ability to select which masternodes to use(or select one + random) - Masternodes are built inside wallet and free of charge. I would setup another wallet on Virtual Machine. Before...
  2. D

    Decentralized mixing

    You don't understand sir. The current setup for Darksend is perfect, it works fine, you can't actually tell where the payment comess from and to who. BUT, when masternodes are logged then its possible for the masternode operators to tell where the payment is coming from and to whom. From what I...
  3. D

    Decentralized mixing

    You don't even read, do you? I have been with Darkcoin for 3 months. I bought my 100 coins and never let them go even after the $12 drop. I am trying to help Darkcoin. I am not some monero or other wankcoin user. I always say BTC and DRK are the only useful cryptocoins. If you have absolutely...
  4. D

    Decentralized mixing

    They already spend millions of tax dollars for Tor relays to deanonymize TOR users. Google "Edward Snowden" read about NSA. They have more money than any darkcoin user in the world has. They will spend it for surveillance. I offered a solution to this. You can ignore this, but if you do, please...
  5. D

    Decentralized mixing

    Did you not read last two posts? :) 1000 DRK is much only for normal citizen, not for government. I am not asking for drastic changes just additional features. Government doesn't buy Bitcoin because why would they? The transaction list is open for them. They will buy DRK to buy Masternodes so...
  6. D

    Decentralized mixing

    What is better? Hope or your own choice? Random masternodes vs your selected or your selected+random? Lets say you know a couple friends who own masternodes. You ask system to use theirs explicitly. Your coins are 100% anonymized to everyone but your friends. Darksend is working on paper...
  7. D

    Decentralized mixing

    Ok lets move out of "unrealistic" as you say. Lets say they buy a hundred. Thats pretty realistic right? Now that still gives them % chance of deanonymizing your coins. That is still percent. Its like using Tor without ur own Exit node thinking "ehh no one cares about me". Sure no one will...
  8. D

    Decentralized mixing

    Why? You think government is poor and don't have massive amounts of money to spend on shit no one but they care about? I am just saying that no one will move from BTC to DRK as their primary coin if you just offer 1-10% chance of having anonymous coins. No one gives a fuck about 10%. The...
  9. D

    Decentralized mixing

    What if they own 99.99%? Setting the rounds to 512 will still leave you with that chance of not having anonymous coins.
  10. D

    Decentralized mixing

    If this is Darkcoin gameplan then announce it on BTCTalk so no one even downloads the wallet. If you will stay with current system, how is it any different from Bitcoin when Darkcoin becomes big and Government begins to buy massive amounts of Masternodes to defeat Darksend? Having 1 out of...
  11. D

    Decentralized mixing

    I thought about this more and I think I have come to the solution. Lets compare the Darkcoin masternode network to Tor. To successfully deanonymize TOR you need to own the Entry node and Exit node then you know the source of traffic(you get this information from Entry node) and the destination...
  12. D

    Decentralized mixing

    Sure. Who can buy more masternode? Normal people or government agencys who have billions just waiting to be spent? :) I am just saying that with current approach Darkcoin is just another altcoin. You could optimize it for each round to be at a different country. Its more likely that there will...
  13. D

    Decentralized mixing

    I think the current approach of mixing is not as secure as you would want it to be. Currently its centralized, correct? The masternode approach is really bad. A masternode costs 1000 DRK. Currently, a DRK costs 2.2 USD. Now imagine if a government agency invested a million. That is 454545 DRK...
  14. D

    RC4 issues, bugs & feature requests

    I am. moli Closed-source RC is the Darkcoin wallet version with Darksend. I don't have "hidden" processes. The CPU usage was strictly from darkcoin-qt.
  15. D

    RC4 issues, bugs & feature requests

    Yes i am speaking about latest stable version. I don't use closed-source RC at all.
  16. D

    RC4 issues, bugs & feature requests

    I was using a new wallet.
  17. D

    RC4 issues, bugs & feature requests

    I have high CPU usage while sync on Windows 7 with latest stable build. Peaks at 57% on my Quadcore. I can't imagine what it would do to a computer with a single-core CPU. Edit: After sync everything is normal. Peaking at 0%.
  18. D

    Development Update - August 19, 2014

    All those who have problems with Bandwidth. I can recommend you http://ecatel.info They offer dedicated servers(yes dedicated, not VPS) starting at 30 EUR per month with standard package of 10 TB bandwidth per month. Their servers are located in the Netherlands and are Tor exit node friendly...
  19. D

    RC4 Launch

    I think the price will sky rocket only when Darksend is stable and open-source. I can see all the black markets implementing Darkcoin.
  20. D

    RC4 Launch

    Damn. Bought at 12 USD, now price: 1.44 USD :( My thousand turned in to a hundred :( Why did the price drop so hard? Darkcoin is what Bitcoin should have been. It should be rising not falling. Edit: Sync is stuck at Block 2500. Using stable build. Edit2: After restart it continues to sync.
Back
Top