Search results

Yep, it's time for 0.1 DRK denominations. Sounds like this will get fixed next release.

Agreed. According to drk.mn, there are 946 active masternodes + wannabe masternodes. In other words, approximately 946,000 coins are tied up. There are 4,700,000 DRK coins outstanding. The ratio of tied up collateral to coins outstanding is 946/4700=0.201. So we've tied up 20% of the coin with...

So the minimum denomination amount needs to change to 0.1 DRK. Is this a problem to add?

You have a point, but that's not how it usually works. The masternode operators simply buy more static IPs and run multiple darkcoind daemons on the same servers. The extra IPs come at an incremental cost. Perhaps reducing the MN requirement from 1000 to 500 DRK should coincide with a static...

I know, but we are simply not being patient enough. This coin is only 8 months old, and we are on day 3 of open sourcing. We have come a long way over a short period of time. We must learn from the history of Bitcoin. There were many points in time when it seemed all hope was lost. We may be...

Exactly. I suggested that above. A 500 DRK minimum to run a MN would most likely result in a doubling of masternodes within a few weeks.

How about a simple 2:1 masternode split? Require just 500 DRKs to run a masternode. Existing MN holders (which I would characterize as the loyal die hards) will most definitely re-do their setups, effectively doubling the number of masternodes from 900 to 1800. This would be painful for MN...

Hell yes. Buh-bye ghashio, buh-bye darkcoinboxru.

Thanks for the explanation. I wonder if a block height based AND protocol based boot would be possible. Soft intro RC5 in parallel with RC4, and once a certain number of blocks go by after the soft launch, give RC4 the real boot.

Details, please.

Definitely. We don't want a surprise enforcement, but we should take advantage of the current 90% voluntary paying super-majority we have now. The altruism isn't guaranteed at any point in the future. When we kick off the non-payers, we want them to be a tiny minority. Darkcoin is becoming more...

Agreed. The pool operators have taken the masternode operators to the woodshed for long enough. If they want to keep 100% of their mined coins, go mine something else. We are Darkcoin. It's time for the pimp hand.

ubuntu2@108:~$ darkcoind getinfo { "version" : 101304, "protocolversion" : 70037, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 14124.44090011, "anonymized_balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 28337, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 15, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.95208694...

JIRA is an excellent choice! DRK beer tip sent.

Thanks for acknowledging everyone's efforts and keeping up the morale! In light of improvements to software, I was wondering if the dev team is using any bug tracking software e.g. Bugzilla? There seems to be enough chatter here that it's possible some reported bugs could get overlooked. Also...

Another approach to lowering the average transaction size would be to re-consider the denomination sizes. I recall there was a binary tree being tested a few weeks back (0.001, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, 0.016,..., 0.001 * 2^20). If the denominations were 'snapped to grid' on a decade scale you could...

Have you enabled coin control to see the breakdown of what's available in your wallet? You may need to wait for more activity on the blockchain to mix in with others.

That's my read of this scenario. If it's a legit problem, I think there are solutions that are straightforward to implement. I have to remind myself that this is testnet, and NOW is the time and place to break stuff. :) The balance for a given address is available at each block, as you can see...

I believe I've located a flaw in the anonymization process that allows one to re-acquire the new address location after denomination and mixing. At block 6454, I sent 4471.923 tDRK from my masternode (n3477ZfbKrovCAZ8WgBHHk1f9YwzWgjJ3o) to a fresh wallet (moiqjRS3APogkKBFvTHbKiaSu6kdYXK5WX)...

Feel free to direct to my MN with -usemasternode=54.92.17.170:19999. It's updated to the very latest.