Search results

is @bittawm in bitcointalk are good to trust?

Where is the pool hashrate readings? I told you to show 1 worker & 10800MHs on pool site like coinmine.pl:(

@bittawm in bitcointalk seem a renowned group buy handler.

oops, someone on bitcointalk.org are found out about this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1888522.0 They are scrambling like hell. Hopes more useful intel to see.

It's good to know ibelink still in the game. But thats sounds like a kick starting project with no guarantee on a final product . I don' t like it IMO.

With this kind of UI display should do no more tricks & take my money already.

Can't just point this prototype to coinmine.pl already? Or they are avioing to do so?

Thanks. I'm looking forward to see the result.. :FingerCorss

That's kinda weird, pepole on bitcointalk.org are not notice this new asic, just like never happened.

That's scary 30000GHs+ Just finger cross & prepare for the worse.

If ibelink made good presentation video for the world first X11 asic "DM384" ,why not they don't make this right for "DM11G" too? If I were ibelink,i will upload a better video& img once we notice this video are bad . Its don't make sense they made bad video for such this huge product...

Some funny findings ,ibelink did make his own demo video for his previous product "DM384" and they did show their product in proper way (1 worker 1 hashrate reading demo in video part 3) That's much odd they don't make video in the same way instead letting Cyptonyka to made such this shady/bad...

As i remember, currently max hashrate for singe worker entry are 4 Linked giants (4x900MH/s) They have to beark this hashrate into the same way (1 worker) to gain most of my trust . agreed?

I dont think such this function are necessary at all , whats the point/profit to break up 4 ASIC Blades into 4 wokers for different pools & worker names? This is the best way to cover the tricks i mention before .(12 baikal A900 giants in 3-4 workers) They don't need to show this function at...

But i notice DM11G uses 28nm chip as well , and heard someone on slack "10.8GH/s cant be possible in that size unless they are at like 14 NM ASICS" So i'm wondering .:confused: btw did you on slack already?(dashnation)

I'm looking at the baikal mini 150M some info state mini use 28nm chips as well http://www.ebay.com/itm/X11-X13-X14-X15-Quark-Qubit-Miner-Baikal-150M-40W-DASH-miner-/112055019860 Anyone can tell what size of chip we are currently using?

Thank you, i just cant do the math haha

10.8GH/s powered by 28nm chips X 64 chip Efficiency are 0.07 W/MH 64 X 0.07 X 730W= 3270MH/s=3.27GH/s? I'm no engineer:oops: ,am i wrong?

Bitbaza just updated his shop more Asic Info to dig out http://bitbaza.com/shop/25/desc/ibelinkdm11g Heshreyt: 10.8 GH / s ± 5% Energy consumption: 730 W (at an ambient temperature of 25 degrees Celsius) Efficiency: 0.07 W / MH (at ambient temperature of 25 degrees Celsius) number of chips...

Again, i uploaded my giants runs for 54 mins+ pool site data for comparing , i suppose the new asic should do almost same number with my giants and hope to see they'll show his pool data like coinmine.pl . Please point me out if i got anything wrong.