Search results

That's why I always disable UPnP that kind of crap.

It depends on how much US$100 is worth by the time Dash hits it.

This observation tells us the exact workaround for the delisting problem.

As I mentioned, I am not complaining about the payment. After more than one month observing the the nodes with large variances, it seems exploitable because payments seem to be skipped rather than delayed. The variance should make the payment time sometimes shorter and longer, not doubling the...

Regarding the variance, I still need to observe it a little bit. It looks like the payment for MN with large variance was skipped instead of having a normal distribution.

1. I mentioned variance in payment timing. I said blocks between successive payments. 2. I am not the only one experiencing the crashes. The nodes have plenty of RAM and disk space and the setup has no problem for 0.11.2.x. If you consider mentioning these two issues as trolling, the only thing...

I have cron script to take care of the crash. Please do not consider this as some complain because my MNs did not get paid. My MNs got paid but I am aware of these two issues. When we see both large variance and crash, this should ring a bell.

With 0.12.0.x, we are back to have two previous problems before having centralized control of MN network: 1. Large variance for blocks between successive payments. 2. MN crash. After 55 minor versions, we still have no words on what is causing the crashes. Do we even know what the source of...

What is the variance for getting payment with average number of blocks per payment? It seems a deviation of 2260 blocks from the average number of blocks (i.e. the total number of MNs) is too large. Take this as an example...

The bug is definitely still there. I can confirm that.

Does that number have anything to do with your MN position on the payment queue? Some of my MNs got paid in roughly 6 days while some did not get paid for more than a week. How can I check the positions of MNs on the queue?

How do you ask for a better rate on shapeshift?

Can the MN network act as P2Pool at the same time? Then, force everyone to mine with the MN network regardless how much hash power one may have.

What will happen if many MNs report that a MN is off the list when this is not true? Can a MN operator who controls a large amount of MNs kick other MNs off the list?

I noticed my MNs getting >100% cpu time with "top" from time to time.

Thank you!

Do we know the owner of dashnodes.com? I am not sure if it is off or it is due to some other problems. Only some MNs are incorrectly reported expired.

Will we still need MN network?

How about calling it "DASH changes"?

Something is wrong with dashnodes.com: http://explorer.dashninja.pl/address/Xqp8HaGaQS9MzJ78RBW8d9NkZAiP1FnqFf http://www.dashnodes.com/index/address/Xqp8HaGaQS9MzJ78RBW8d9NkZAiP1FnqFf https://dashninja.pl/mndetails.html?mnpubkey=Xqp8HaGaQS9MzJ78RBW8d9NkZAiP1FnqFf dashnodes.com is reporting...