Search results

  1. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    I think the perfect solution would remove the need for mining at all. I'll leave that one for the visionaries to think about :D Loving 70040. I'm not a regular tester but this feels like a nice big step up.
  2. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Just be careful if you're using a VPS provider that charges for bursting CPU usage! I was running at 300% CPU util on an AWS C3.xxlarge when I tried that. Obviously wouldn't get charged extra but I assume you would do on a T2.micro. Personally, I'd rather see mining and masternodes seperate...
  3. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Setgenerate really isn't very efficient...I get about 130KH/s on a my new i7 CPU but I'd to love see a few more people (the majority of QT owners) having it turned on at minimum.
  4. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Just putting 3 Drk through two rounds then going to try 2.5DRK and then go larger.
  5. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Just out of interest, if I pointed 500Mh/s at testnet and I mined every block...what would happen? Would I just ruin it for everybody?
  6. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    getminininginfo
  7. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Thanks for the 5000tdrk whoever that was :D My heart still flutters when I see 5000 DRK pop up...
  8. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    If I am the only person mining I did power down for a while to squeeze an extra 0.5 out of my GPU....
  9. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    If somebody could send 200 to mxomigzggXJYqQfVUnV7mYPZUmmU3AFBHj I'd be appreciative. Am I correct in thinking that all testnet addresses should begin with an m? Because the first address in this fresh QT install is n3q9i5p93U9tuC7AC6CH8UxZ6qjyyARgPV
  10. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Yup, I'm waiting for either of the faucets to pay out...
  11. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    I bet you wouldn't say that to my display's face :)
  12. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Thanks flare. Ill just keep mining and assume everything is ok. Not sure how I can sync blockchain and then be three hours behind within ten minutes though!
  13. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    My QT keeps saying 3 hours behind while I'm solo mining. Not sure whats going on. Any idea how many nodes we have on testnet at the moment?
  14. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    "Pool 0 not providing work fast enough" And I haven't even made any tDrk yet. This is an outrage!
  15. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    If you know what you are doing and never make a mistake then sure, its secure. Then again, if you've got a port open to the world (9999) who knows what exploits might remain undiscovered...
  16. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Sorry mate. I might be on another level but that level is probably below most people. I'm half informed, loaded, safety off and ready to fire off bad advice.
  17. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    i.e from remote terminal darkcoind getaccount address 0 (send 1000 tDrk to that address) etc etc
  18. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    RPC port can be anything. Your firewall needs to be open to 19999 though. Normal masternode except that you can run with a hot wallet without fear.
  19. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    Gasp! What if testnet is actually the real mainnet and mainnet is testnet? ::mind blown::
  20. stonehedge

    v0.10.15.x Testing

    OK. I'm turning into a tDrk mining maniac. Why haven't I mined any tDrk yet? I WANT MOAR TDRK! GRRRAAAAAH!
Back
Top