Search results

The only thing is the setgenerate value--depends on the cores your cpu has. If you set it to 1, it uses 1 core, 2, 2 cores, etc, etc. -1 maxes out all available cores.

Look at the post above yours for the windows version.

He acknowledged it 10 days ago in this thread...

Settings, Options, Display, Check the coin control box When you send, deselect the darksend box at the bottom, then click inputs, select list mode and check the boxes next to the inputs you want to use to send. All the DS coins will have numbers under the DS rounds category (avoid those). Then...

So exchange them for bitcoin and find a local german to take it. More likely to find it that way. I would have suggested localbitcoins but so far they have stopped service in Germany.

There is no such thing as partial privacy if you used some anon coins and non-anon coins--those non-anon coins linked you to the receiver address. If you want to select the coins, do a non dx tx and then select the inputs manually in coin control excluding the anon funds (noted by the ds rounds).

There is no normal transactions any longer. If you don't have DS checked, it will send from wherever. You either have privacy or you don't.

lol

Not yet.

Nice misleading title

Yep, mix them after you receive them. From that point on, you can send them to your primary address if you desire with no direct linkages. I recommend 8 rounds to everyone as it's a 1 in 3^8 pool.

Unnecessary, it's to the buyer's benefit to not link the sender to the receiver. The receiver address is always known (the end result where the inputs end up). If you want a private transfer, obtain the funds to a freshly generated address and anon them. Besides, by "requesting" payment, you...

On average, that should be accurate (node count divided by average blocks found per day), however, with the ever changing node count and the reference node(s) seemingly being restarted at different times (for various reasons), seems consistency in payouts is dwindling for multiple people.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoil-lightweight-darkcoin-wallet-v0-9-17-19.3017/ Should be since it was built from an older branch. Besides, if you have a duplicate wallet file, if it corrupts, it's not the end of the world. Always have backups. I haven't personally used Darkcoil but it...

Did you try Darkcoil (stripped down version without DS)?

That was a new argument in there for the DS process. For your purposes, you shouldn't have to do anything with it.

Or you do so by community funded masternodes that have their income streams donated to whatever charitable cause you want. Naming a version Darkcoin - Cute Puppy edition or the likes just comes off as cheesy in comparison to actually doing something (i.e. donations to various causes).

You're being just as loose with your funds without encryption as you are without a password (you do realize that the encryption is to encrypt your passphrase). Anyone that doesn't have a password to protect their wallet deserves to lose their funds. If you are too lazy to type a number after the...

Addresses are different but in terms of core commands on the daemon, it's the same--easiest way (a starting basis) to see what this means is to load up the bitcoin client, go to the debug console and type "help" and now do the same for Darkcoin. It will be obvious then. Obviously there will be...

Just sounds corny. If I were an outsider and this was suppose to be a revolutionary digital currency, I certainly would pass over it with a name like that.