Search results

Yeah, this is the fundamental reasoning behind this.

Again, in this model there would be no managers. The community would manage it. The funds would be help in multi-sig address for safety. If the community votes 'yes', that projects would get funded. The projects would propose something with a deadline or achievement stage. Then it's up to the...

Not throwing coins around at all, only funding project with merits. Not hacked no :) Just and idea that sparked due to some discussion, and apparently Evan himself proposed this a while back

I perfectly understand the argument Pablo. But the non issuance of these funds is far far below, for example, than reward halving in terms of market liquidity. I argue that the effect of these non-issued coins diluted in time would be by far less beneficial at this stage, than to put them to...

Some people talk, other people do. It came to my attention Evan proposed this himself a while back, but nobody stepped up. Totally missed it or I would have proposed this before. It shouldn't be too difficult. What could be difficult is to keep this civil and professional so we can attract...

Precisely. Use Fiver.com to create material, buy a domain and wordpress theme for a project, organize or sponsor a small event or initiative, fund a dev for some sort of development one might imagine but has no skills... Imagination is the only limit.

i don't quite follow, mind expanding? The idea really is a 'micro DGbB' though. .

Absolutely agree. That is the whole point of this thread. Either make something rock-solid to propose, or drop the idea entirely. I'll be updating the OP accordingly.

I guess. That really depends on the voting mechanism. I have a few ideas about it, but still need to think harder on this. The whole idea behind this is to get people involved with Dash a little more, spark the creative juice, maybe even a little VC funding to later propose something to the DGbB...

2 of 3, or 3 of 5 multisig address by veteran team members&community members Or do you mean a project?

This is cross posting from your other thread. You've still not understood how GGbB works, so I kindly ask you to let those who do understand how Dash's governance models work to debate. There are no leftover funds to point to. There are monthly un-allocated funds however. This would not be at...

Dash Governance by Community - DGbC The idea sparked into my mind the other day, following some forum discussions and some official Slack discussions. I personally hate seeing funds go to waste each month, in a sense that they’re there, ready and available, yet don’t get used because all the...

Like I previously mentioned, I doubt you ever will. I answered directly at your every remark. How is that avoidance? On the blockchain. That's why it exits. To prevent fraud. Here is an example of the proposal fee I submitted. (but was not approved unfortunately)...

I doubt you ever will. Yes, you are wrong. One thing is budget allocation, the other is proposal payout. Yes, it's something you don't understand. Therefore the second question does not make sense The proposal fee is something the proposer pays from his own pocket. It's a small fee that...

Me?? Dilingently refuse to answer? See, you're being a troll as this has never been addressed to me. First time I read about it. From the total DGbB budget, any left over budget that is not allocated simply does not get mined. Period. Coins are not created. Happy now? Please stop it. .

They've all been addressed. There is only you bumping this thread ad nauseum simply not accepting the answers given to you. Please stop it.

The fact that people still respond to this thread is nothing short of mind boggling.

That is normal behaviour. I had the same doubt myself and @flare explained it to me. When the QT says "successful" it means it successfully sent the signed message to the nodes. It does not necessarily mean that the node successfully activated. Could be for several reasons (bad config, ban, on...

Oh bummer... Don't loose heart @ashmoran - you never know if some GO nut joins your efforts! Are you sure they're rewritting the code and it's not an addon feature or something? Seems weird after so much dev time they'd throw the towel in on python. It's not like it's a dummy language. .

@UdjinM6 I suppose we should be preferably testing without multisession?