Search results

No, "platform=1" MNs still run Core. So they are in the same pool. "platform=1" MNs will get additional payments.

This is just normal optimisation, that will always happen. The rule is: keep the hardware costs as low as possible, but high enough to avoid being banned. Let's imagine an additional income of 5% for the Platform part: So 50 Dash per year. With actual Dash price it's more than 2000€/year. For...

I don't think so, because almost any MNO would choose "platform=1", since hardware is so cheap and gets cheaper every day.

I would vote for: HPMNs, because of the mitigation of the risk, that a problem with Platform brings down all MNs. Keeping 1k as collateral for a simple MN, because it makes the transition smooth. 2k as collateral for a HPMN, because: The barrier of entry to Platform shouldn't be too high...

From Sam's (IMHO good) explanations, I understand the following (that could be completely wrong): 1.) Core and Platform are 2 different software packages, and run independently. 2.) Core is responsible for IS/CL and so on. 3.) Platform is responsible for contact information, running DAPPs and so...

Ok, then I did not understand very well Sam Westrich at 49:00. I'll need to improve my English...

Hi, If I understand it right, you'll implement "pre-proposal: let MNOs determine proposal fee". Thank you very much!

Hi, I guess, that the left one is a joke. For the right one, I would say: rather "dash.org" than "Digital Cash". The curious people would then probably go to the web-site and educate themself. IMO, it would be nice to produce such t-shirts and sell them here to Dash-enthusiasts. I would buy 1 or...

2020 May, Intel price was 63 2022 June, Intel price is 41 Intel is dead. Please do not waste investors time and money... ;)

Same experience here. Did you check debug.log? I got something like "IO error ... Too many open files". "ulimit -n" was 1024 Then, after doing "ulimit -n 4096", the problem was solved. Cheers, Peter

Yes, but it's not the same idea. Refunding is not equal to locking the stake.

IMO a good idea. It's probably not too hard to implement. I would vote for it. Could you please make a proposal? Peter

Dear Robert, Wouldn't it be possible for you to wait for such a decision after the election of the new DTPs? Peter

If you knew a group, that would do a better job than DCG does, I would be glad to vote for it.

It's sad to see such a delay in the development. But it seems, that Platform is a really huge and complex software project. From my personal experience I know, that such delays are very common and hard to avoid. So I'm voting Yes. I would like the developers to continue, so that they can ship...

Hi, I guess, that this is for usage in the US. What about availability in Europe? TIA for any updates, Peter

I don't see any problem. Say you have 200€. A) 200€ savings with 5% interest. After one year: 210€ (5%) B) Buying goods for 200€ once per month with 5% discount (and reselling immediately to get back the 200€). After one year: 320€ (60%) So I agree: X% instantly will always out perform X%...

Hi, Could you please send me the link to the roadmap? TIA, Peter (I've already asked [email protected] but without success...)

I don't think so, it is not related. There is no activity at all for crypto/crypto markets. No activity with LTC/BTC, but a lot with LTC/EUR.

Hi, Are there already some ongoing efforts to add that trading pair to the bitcoin.de exchange? How could we make that happen please? (Dogecoin has just been added...) TIA for any hints, Peter